Pete in the Colorado Mtns
10-02-2003, 06:04 PM
See the thread "CO2 and Surface Agitation Debate", from 2/6/2003. Lots
of info/opinions there.
pete
HDH wrote:
> Hi All,
> Just set up a new 55 gallon and planning to make it a light- to
> moderately-planted tank, without CO2. I currently have an Emperor 400 on it
> that is making more noise than it should, and I am going to return it,
> either for another one or for a cannister (Eheim 2235). I would prefer not
> to spend the money on a cannister, especially since opinions of the Emperor
> are almost unanimously good.
>
> My question relates to turbulence. There is *a lot* of it on the surface of
> the water with the Emperor, and in my research I've come across some info
> regarding turbulence being detrimental to plants (robs them of oxygen?).
>
> How much of a concern should this be for me?
>
> Thanks for any input,
> Howard
>
>
--
--
pete
"It is unwise to insult a doughnut be refusing to eat it."
of info/opinions there.
pete
HDH wrote:
> Hi All,
> Just set up a new 55 gallon and planning to make it a light- to
> moderately-planted tank, without CO2. I currently have an Emperor 400 on it
> that is making more noise than it should, and I am going to return it,
> either for another one or for a cannister (Eheim 2235). I would prefer not
> to spend the money on a cannister, especially since opinions of the Emperor
> are almost unanimously good.
>
> My question relates to turbulence. There is *a lot* of it on the surface of
> the water with the Emperor, and in my research I've come across some info
> regarding turbulence being detrimental to plants (robs them of oxygen?).
>
> How much of a concern should this be for me?
>
> Thanks for any input,
> Howard
>
>
--
--
pete
"It is unwise to insult a doughnut be refusing to eat it."