Lotus wrote:
"Jonathan Ball" wrote in message ...

Lotus wrote:


If you knew, as you now falsely claim to know, that a
"lick" and a "block" are the same thing, why would you
not have expanded your search?


A 'mineralised block', and a 'mineral lick' may be the same
thing, but I logically presumed a 'FEED block' to be a crumbly
block, not lick, of feed, as indeed Michael later described.

You don't know your doughy ass from your pimply face
about feed blocks, ~~shitweed~~, so you shouldn't have
been making any assumptions about them at all.

What YOU know about are "inner earth beings",
~~shitweed~~. In other words, what you "know" is
nonsense. You have no credibility.


The 'mineralised supplementary feed lick' you found was a
mineralised block containing grain products, not what I
had in mind, nor what Michael described as a 'feed block'

False. It is EXACTLY what Michael described as a feed
block.