Lotus wrote:
"Jonathan Ball" wrote in message ...

You didn't know then that a "lick" and a "block" were,
"for all intents and purposes, the same thing".

Yes, I did.

No, you quite clearly did not. Otherwise, you wouldn't
have ****ed away so much time.

A mineralised block (without 'protein') is the same thing as a
mineralised salt-lick. At this stage (above) I was looking for
feed blocks as Michael had described- "There are licks AND
feed blocks. Both weigh about fifty pounds. The feed blocks
must be protected from the weather or they will crumble and
become inedible. The licks are solid enough to be either simply
dropped in the pasture or put in a salt block holder". Now we
know that supplementary feed blocks which contain minerals
are available, but I have yet to see them referred to as 'mineralised
feed blocks'.

It doesn't matter if you have or have not seen any
"references" to the words "mineralized feed blocks",


It does- crumbly 'feed blocks', as Michael described,

He did NOT describe anything as "crumbly". I did a
Google search, and he never used the word, or any
synonym. You are LYING.

But that's to be expected from someone who believes in
"inner earth beings". You have no credibility.

and which was the sort of thing I was looking for, are not the
same as the 'mineralized supplementary feed licks' you
found- mineralised blocks, containing grain products.

You should have expanded your search. You simply don't
know what you're doing.



you stupid ****: such blocks EXIST and are sold, and a
reference has been provided to the THING, no matter
what it's called.


All sorts of blocks and licks exist apparently. I was
searching specifically for a mineralised block of feed.
'MINERALISED FEED BLOCK. Get it yet?

You dishonestly kept your search too narrow, because
you didn't WANT to find references. You had a
polemical goal in mind from the start, and you didn't
want to find something else.

But that's to be expected from someone who believes in
"inner earth beings". You have no credibility.



****ING LOSER! You're beating a dead horse.


Yeah, you.

Not me. I'm kicking your teeth in.



It was JIM that said that 'salt licks' and 'mineralised blocks'
were two different things.

If you REALLY had known that a "block" and a "lick"
were effectively the same thing, you wouldn't have
needed to **** away time on arguing with him.


A feed block/lick is not the same thing as a mineralised block/lick.

It is the same thing. You are too stupid to know.


It is not.

It is. YOU have even now acknowledged that it is.

YOU don't know what you are talking about,
obviously, and ~you~ are way too stupid to know it.

It doesn't work for you simply to try to redirect my
accurate accusations about you back at me,
~~shitweed~~. It's too blatant.