View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Old 01-04-2019, 02:18 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
David[_24_] David[_24_] is offline
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jan 2017
Posts: 160
Default Rose not flowering - how long to give it?

On Mon, 01 Apr 2019 13:54:48 +0100, David Hill wrote:

On 01/04/2019 13:42, Stewart Robert Hinsley wrote:
On 01/04/2019 13:03, Chris Hogg wrote:
Very many years ago I was told that the leaves on rose suckers coming
from the rootstock have a different number of leaflets to those of the
grafted scion.

Google's not being very co-operative, and the rootstocks used vary
between different countries (you want a rootstock adapted to the
climate), but it seems that a dog rose cultivar (Rosa 'Laxa' is a
common rootstock in Britain).

It will depend on the choice of rootstock and scion, but if the
rootstock and scion belong to taxa with different numbers of leaflets
then the suckers will have a different number to the scion; if you have
instead, for example, a double Rugosa grafted on a rugosa rootstock,
the suckers and scion will not be vegetatively distinguishable. (The
number of leaflets can be variable on a single plant.) The shape of the
and other characters, may also differ.

For a more obvious constrast, Sorbus aria cultivars (entire leaf
margins) are often grafted on a Sorbus intermedia (deeply pinnatelky
lobed leaves) rootstock.

I had a small leafed shrub rose (Got to around 12 ft), it had yellow
flowers then set rose hips that only stayed on the plant for about 6
weeks, so by mid summer it has bare stems, just leaves.
As for it sprawling over the ground, that could just be because it lacks
any sort of support, all rambling roses will do this and they seldom
have hips.
I'd get a couple of posts in and suppore the poor thing, I think you
will be well rewarded

Thanks to all.

I am assuming that it may qualify as a "ground cover rose" which is
intended, as far as I can tell, to bush out from the base all around
and..errr...cover the ground. :-) refers to "rose blindness"
which was one of the articles which prompted my original question. refers to "ground cover
roses" and the included picture does seem to be close to what I have
(although with far fewer shoots).

The leaves are variable in number, mainly 6 or 7, but as the RHS articles
note leaf numbers are not definitive in this type of rose and can vary
from branch to branch oor even leaf to leaf.

Anyway, it looks as though a feed and more sunshine and fresh air may lead
it to flower.

If it is reluctant to flower due to location, soil, or just grumpiness
then it may be for the great compost heap in the sky.


Dave R

P.S. there is another rose which looks just like it growing out of a space
between some stones/bricks not far away. It doesn't look like a place that
you would deliberately plant a rose (but who knows?). This may suggest
that it is a wild rose and has propagated vegatitively from the other one.

Dell XPS laptop running W8.1