Dear John, no John,

You guys (NASA moles) are the really smart ones because, you're
getting paid for your "spin" and "damage control" efforts, all on
behalf of Lord NASA.

I'm just the observational village idiot that can actually still see.
Unlike yourself, I'm still learning about Venus, making lots and lots
of mistakes along the way and damn proud of it.

That's right John, I'm an under achiever if there ever was, as I
haven't goten anyone killed nor do I elect to associate with those
that have. How about yourself?

btw; topographical maps of Venus and Mars are certainly different and,
I do not confuse them unless you're the one, the idiot, not smart
enough to be looking at the current data. And, I certainly don't need
any stinking maps in order to point out what a thorough bunch of fools
and of much worse things you are.

I was looking, searching for NASA's moral standards. They have
standards on just about everything and anything, yet something as
important and crucial as morals is absolutely nowhere in sight, I
guess they simply have no morals, as that would certainly account for
all their past and ongoing cloaking for NSA/DoD agendas.

http://guthvenus.tripod.com/mars-venus.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/life-options.htm

Regards, Brad Guth / IEIS

---------------------------------------------------------

John Beaderstadt wrote in message ...
Brad Guth wrote:

Obviously I'm not as smart as you and I'll likely make a few thousand
more mistakes (inaccuracies).

Look. Claiming to be a far greater expert on Venus than anyone else, so
much so that you can see features in photographs not visible to anyone
but yourself, then not being able to tell the difference between
topographical maps of Venus and Mars, goes *way* beyond "innaccuracy."
It calls your very competence into question and, frankly, I've seen you
do absolutely nothing which demonstrates your competence to be greater
than that of the average 10th-grader. Sure, you can sling jargon around
quite impressively, but your command of data, your ability to draw
conclusions from data, and your ability to communicate your "findings"
all indicate, in my experience, a 13-year-old underachiever.

If that is how you wish to be perceived, or if you don't care how you
are perceived, then fine. Just don't complain because we treat you in
accordance with that perception.