In article , JennyC
writes
"Janet Baraclough" wrote
Chris Norton contains these words:
(Jim W) wrote:
In other words a researcher/journalist has done their work and is
giving
the source.
Imho trawling usenet archives for unverifiable soundbites hardly
counts as research...or even, professional journalism :~}
Janet.
So what counts as serious research Janet ?
Surely the web is just as reliable or not as other sources ........?
Depends what sources you're thinking about, doesn't it? It's as reliable
as anywhere else as a source of opinion, but it doesn't have as
rigorous a peer review as scientific papers, for example.
--
Kay Easton
Edward's earthworm page:
http://www.scarboro.demon.co.uk/edward/index.htm