Recently I discussed the fact of compound leaves in Ash trees and that
compounding seems to be the overall general nature of the DNA molecule.
It is a compound molecule itself in its double helix. And physics is
quantum physics with symmetry for every particle has its antiparticle
and every particle with a leftward track has its rightward track event.
So given time, in the creation of anything new has symmetry all due to
its foundation of Quantum Physics of symmetry in everything.

So in biology the creation of a new species is a symmetrical creation
which I call compounding. Given time there is a internal force of the
DNA molecule to compound new structure onto old species to create new
species. Ash trees were created from old species that had noncompound
leaves. Tetrapods were created in Devonian due to the force of
compounding of fins into multifins which eventually morphed into legs.
So legs are compounded fins of fish.

Here comes the great and grave question. How do we get the human species
from apelike species via Stonethrowing from Compounding? So if we go
back some 10 to 12 million years ago and observe the apelike creatures
on Earth at that time then how do we get those apelike creatures to
begin a behaviour of Stonethrowing which will eventually lead to the
Human species by means of Compounding? You see, I am having trouble here
of seeing how compounding creates Stonethrowing which is a behaviour.
But a behaviour rooted in the bone structure that is able to throw.

I guess to answer that question would have to focus on the behaviour
previous to stonethrowing which was treeswinging. So the bone and muscle
morphology of treeswinging then became stonethrowing. So we must ask the
question of whether Treeswinging when compounded can yield a new
behaviour of Stonethrowing?

Modern Humans no longer are treeswingers but are skillful stonethrowers
whereas chimpanzees are treeswingers and rudimentary stonethrowers for
they throw only underarm.

So can we say that if you Compound the bone or muscle morphology in some
manner of a treeswinger, can you then derive stonethrowing?

Good question.

But getting back to this NOVA show on tetrapods, it is much easier to
see that legs from fins is a Compounding process where fish at all times
even before the Devonian often were born mutations of compounded fins
but the environment was not suitable-- Pennsylvania region as swampland
during Devonian time.

Also I must note that the process of Compounding is a replacement of the
theory of Darwin Evolution but Compounding is a process inside Quantum
Physics and Superdeterminism. So the big theory is that Quantum Physics
is everything and biology is a subset of Quantum Physics and the
operation of biology is Superdeterminism and inside Superdeterminism is
the process or force of Compounding.

In the 1960s when I was going to High School I read in some book about a
"life force". And no-one seems to pay attention to that concept which
has been largely discredited by Darwin Evolution. But I believe that the
process of Compounding is in fact what was called in the past as the
"life force".

Compounding in Biology: to make a first stab definition would be that in
Quantum Physics there is a tendency towards left and right symmetry and
this plays out in biology in that things come in at least 2 to maintain
symmetry.

In the NOVA show it was found by Dr. Clack and associates that their
tetrapod had 8 digits and with time reduced to 7 and eventually 5. But
it goes to show that in Compounding the creation process is symmetrical
and that the environment later chisels off (or maybe even add more) to
meet efficiency for that environment.

When eyes were first created in animals they came in 2 due to
Compounding symmetry. Same for lungs, same for nostrils, same for ears,
same for heart chambers.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies