schrieb im Newsbeitrag ups.com...

Over the last 29 years direct, not proxy, measurement of the
Sun's output has shown no long term growth large enough to
explain the warming of the Earth, only an 11-year cycle
is noticed:

You're like a parrot; over and over again with the same squawk. Very
well. For the benefit of those who might be swayed by your misery.
Those satellites only measure radiation from ~200nm to 2000nm. The
Sun is most variable in the UV portion of the spectrum. It also emits
large quantities of microwaves during coronal mass ejections. Plus
there is always the ever present galactic microwave background
radiation through which our solar system is passing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:M...irradiance.jpg
http://www.google.com/search?q=coron...ion+microwaves
http://www.google.com/images?q=coronal+mass+ejection

Total solar irradiance (TSI) variations may be small, but weren't it those
AGWs who claim that small changes in their models might have an excessive
change in the resulted output?

Furthermore TSI is not all, what sun is providing.
Sun is modulating CRF, that again is reversely modulating LACC and
therefore cooling.
This effect can be much more stronger than any CO2 GH effect can ever be.

http://www.phys.huji.ac.il/~shaviv/a...ensitivity.pdf
http://www.john-daly.com/solar/solar.htm
http://www.schulphysik.de/klima/elnino/sun-enso.htm