06-07-2007, 05:58 PM
posted to talk.politics.animals,uk.environment.conservation,misc.rural,uk.rec.gardening,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 11
|
|
Now even spiders, squid and lobsters could have rights, and about time too!
"irate vegan" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 15:24:38 GMT, "ontheroad" wrote:
"irate vegan" wrote
Of course he does, and you know it. If an organised dog
fight was interrupted by a group of anti-dog fighters he
would call them hypocrites if they were wearing leather
shoes. His farcical nonsense is right off the scale, and so
is his hypocrisy. He's the only one on these forums who
still denies the collateral deaths associated with the
production of his food items, and yet he's always the first
to try attacking vegetarians for allegedly denying the
collateral deaths associated with the production of their
food items, even after they've acknowledged them.
"The production of my beef promotes no CDs. Period."
and
"The production of the beef I eat causes no CDs."
rick etter Nov 15 2003 http://tinyurl.com/cpdy7
i see you still don't understand english, cripple....
I understand it rather well, and my being a cripple has
nothing to do with the issue being raised here.
To bad you have never been able to defend your ignorance, nor refute the
reality I post.
As per your own argument against vegetarians, all
food production causes and promotes the collateral
deaths of animals, and any vegetarian who denies
your fact is a lying hypocrite. Your problem here
is that vegans do acknowledge the collateral deaths
accrued during the production of their food stuff, but
you deny the collateral deaths associated with the
production of yours. That marks you down as the
hypocrite rather than the vegan, by dint of your own
argument against them. Way to go, dummy.
===============
Nope. Again, I suggest you learn english, killer...
|