On Jul 16, 4:15 pm, Dutch wrote:
Rupert wrote:
I've given my argument yet again and demonstrated that your criticisms
of it are unsatisfactory.

Stating that your opponents must disprove your assertions is not a
convincing argument.


There's more to it than that. I've elaborated on why the burden of
proof lies where I claim it does. Ball's alternative account of where
the burden of proof lies has serious problems, which I have explained.
He has given no satisfactory response.