David Hare-Scott wrote:
SG1 wrote:
"terryc" wrote in message
...
SG1 wrote:

The commo bit is my take on the 2 twits. When in a country
electorate you ate least have some country leanings. The Snot
(greens) & Labor have none at all. The snot want to lock all of the
country up so we produce nothing.

Whereas a **** like you just keeps preaching watermelon propaganda
without really looking at the policies of parties. Unions are
ditiching Labor and moving support to the greens as they are better
for union members. The greens inherently support small business( =
most family farmer?) If you think their policies need fine tuning
for the bush, join the party. At least they still have a system
where their policies are decided by the party members and not back
office party hacks.

Sorry had a go a being a party hack in my youth (long time ago),
There is NO way I would join a party with a turd tickler as it's head.

A person's sexual preferences or practices are no grounds for evaluating
their political performance or anything else about them unless you have
an interest in how such characteristics might relate directly and
personally to you and your preferences. I cannot think of any forum
where gratuitous sexual slurs about public figures, or anybody, are
appropriate.

David

Well said.

I don't know that any one party will get it right but hopefully this is a start. If everyone concerned worked
together instead of as adversaries, we'd all be better off. Then we could call this country Oztopia

--
Anne Chambers
South Australia

anne dot chambers at bigpond dot com