atec77 wrote:
On 26/01/2011 6:07 PM, terryc wrote:
David Hare-Scott wrote:
terryc wrote:
David Hare-Scott wrote:

My position is that AQIS make these decisions based on available
evidence


The only evidence AQIS uses is the almighty dollar. The Q is
redundant these days.

how do you know this?

The way in which the phrase business risk is now the order of the
day. Shrug, if you had been following what is going on, then you
would have seen it too.
Following the facts would mean he couldn't troll
an old familiar pattern and enough to earn him a plonk

Yet another hint that the facts are out there and easy to find. You would
think that if it was so easy at least one of you would have come up with
something. If asking you to explain and support your assertions is too
uncomfortable then by all means add me to your killfile. This won't add
anything to substance of your comments but you might feel better if they
seem to go unchallenged.

I don't work for the Government, I don't think they are doing a particularly
good job, I have no brief to support AQIS I just like to see reason and
facts have some part our discussions. If AQIS was corrupt or suffering
undue political pressure and making bad decisions I WOULD want to know about
it. I do actually want you blokes to come up with something, if there is
anything.

David