Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
New Juniper Field Data Recorders-help?
We're finally going to phase out our old CMT DOS-based FDRs. (I always
found it to be very funny hooking up those to our new Pentium laptops g ) However, we got 4 of these new Juniper units in and I get to use them first. I would appreciate any opinions, tips or tricks that people have for setting them up, using these in the field and manipulating the data. I will be entering data and UTM coordinates during another goshawk survey in Wyoming. Basically, we've eliminated the paper forms...not the best use for a fancy Win CE handheld computer, eh? Thanks Larry |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
New Juniper Field Data Recorders-help?
Larry Harrell wrote:
We're finally going to phase out our old CMT DOS-based FDRs. (I always found it to be very funny hooking up those to our new Pentium laptops g ) However, we got 4 of these new Juniper units in and I get to use them first. I would appreciate any opinions, tips or tricks that people have for setting them up, using these in the field and manipulating the data. I will be entering data and UTM coordinates during another goshawk survey in Wyoming. Basically, we've eliminated the paper forms...not the best use for a fancy Win CE handheld computer, eh? Thanks Larry Did you get the full Win CE Allegro? Great gadget- the heater really helps in winter and the buttons are big enough for gloves. Check out microsoft.public.pocketpc for the ins and outs of the OS. It's a fairly complex system, especially dealing with the "Activesynch" portion. Once you get the proper sharing folders set up, transferring info to the desk computer is automatic. Just remember that your blank data sheets have to have a different name than your "full" data sheets or you'll lose one or the other when transferring. Simple stuff really but when systems do things on full automatic, mistakes happen. I've had two of the DOS/WinCE combo Allegros (still have one) and they were good field machines. Unfortunately, that model is already out of date. Next datalogger I get I'd like to be about 1/2 the size with twice the battery life. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
New Juniper Field Data Recorders-help?
I've never been rich enough to use these fancy data recorders. But, what I'd like to know is just how effective they are regarding efficiency? Rather than entering data into a such a tool, I'd rather speak into a tape recorder because I think it would be faster. I'm sure it must take more time to enter data than just talking to your tape recorder. At least here in the Northeast- we have so much lousy weather that good field time is in short supply, so I always want to be as efficient as possible in the field. I always have plenty of office time available to do such data entry. -- Joe Zorzin http://www.forestmeister.com "Mike H" wrote in message ... Larry Harrell wrote: We're finally going to phase out our old CMT DOS-based FDRs. (I always found it to be very funny hooking up those to our new Pentium laptops g ) However, we got 4 of these new Juniper units in and I get to use them first. I would appreciate any opinions, tips or tricks that people have for setting them up, using these in the field and manipulating the data. I will be entering data and UTM coordinates during another goshawk survey in Wyoming. Basically, we've eliminated the paper forms...not the best use for a fancy Win CE handheld computer, eh? Thanks Larry Did you get the full Win CE Allegro? Great gadget- the heater really helps in winter and the buttons are big enough for gloves. Check out microsoft.public.pocketpc for the ins and outs of the OS. It's a fairly complex system, especially dealing with the "Activesynch" portion. Once you get the proper sharing folders set up, transferring info to the desk computer is automatic. Just remember that your blank data sheets have to have a different name than your "full" data sheets or you'll lose one or the other when transferring. Simple stuff really but when systems do things on full automatic, mistakes happen. I've had two of the DOS/WinCE combo Allegros (still have one) and they were good field machines. Unfortunately, that model is already out of date. Next datalogger I get I'd like to be about 1/2 the size with twice the battery life. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
New Juniper Field Data Recorders-help?
Mike H wrote in message ...
It's not a matter of being rich - it's a necessity when you have to do a lot of inventory and when you have to use a formalized cruise or inventory program. For instance, here industry all uses the same proprietary program and the FS uses its own unique programs - just tweaked for each Region. When there's a front end for it, it error checks as you go. These things can easily pay for themselves in a year. It's not really a matter of paying for themselves but to "standardize" data collection (especially stand exam and cruise data)and to bring us into the new millenium, kicking and scratching all the way. It's not really a very new idea to take mini-computers into the woods. I remember using an HP palmtop computer set up by a 3P guru. It was pretty slick, adjusting volumes for each marker separately. Of course, if you do a well rounded mix of forestry work - as most sane consultants choose to do, having one is a bit of a luxury. I bet just holding one will make me look more important G. The best thing about the new handhelds is that since they have a trimmed version of Excel onboard, you're no longer tied to proprietary cruise programs. Considering the price those go for, I expect there to soon be some serious free or shareware competition with the big consulting agencies. Also - since the big slowdown, maybe selling forestry software is better than selling forestry... ;( Now, the USFS will be tied to certain official spreadsheets with "tweaked" volume tables instead. With outsourcing on the horizon, the field looks wide open (hint, hint). Maybe not, though. We do have some Excel wizards who could easily build us what the policymakers want us to have (not necessarily what we need, though). I've never been rich enough to use these fancy data recorders. But, what I'd like to know is just how effective they are regarding efficiency? Rather than entering data into a such a tool, I'd rather speak into a tape recorder because I think it would be faster. I'm sure it must take more time to enter data than just talking to your tape recorder. At least here in the Northeast- we have so much lousy weather that good field time is in short supply, so I always want to be as efficient as possible in the field. I always have plenty of office time available to do such data entry. -- Joe Zorzin http://www.forestmeister.com In our western forests, thinning projects generate plenty of data for all those small marked trees. The Head Honchos and bean counters have put a lot of emphasis on getting accurate measurements of trees that are worth about $2.89. Sure, cruiser certification is fine and dandy but, where is the "silvicultural certification" (which insures that they are marking the "right" trees) for timbermarkers? As soon as voice recognition systems are refined, that'll be perfect for ya, Joe. I can see the future of forestry now. Heads-Up-Display from your hardhat. Armed with lasers and mini computers. Real-time satellite imaging. I guess that future isn't really very far off, eh? Larry |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
New Juniper Field Data Recorders-help?
Mike H wrote in message ...
Did you get the full Win CE Allegro? Great gadget- the heater really helps in winter and the buttons are big enough for gloves. Check out microsoft.public.pocketpc for the ins and outs of the OS. It's a fairly complex system, especially dealing with the "Activesynch" portion. Once you get the proper sharing folders set up, transferring info to the desk computer is automatic. Just remember that your blank data sheets have to have a different name than your "full" data sheets or you'll lose one or the other when transferring. Simple stuff really but when systems do things on full automatic, mistakes happen. I've had two of the DOS/WinCE combo Allegros (still have one) and they were good field machines. Unfortunately, that model is already out of date. Next datalogger I get I'd like to be about 1/2 the size with twice the battery life. Yeppers! Brand spanking new. Thanks for the info and I will make sure to back up my files. I've also seen that you can attach a GPS receiver in the PC card slot in the back. Anyone have any experience with that setup? I don't think we'd want to invest in that kind of thing, especially since we just received a shipment of $64,000 worth of GPS hardware and software. Larry |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
New Juniper Field Data Recorders-help?
What I really want in the woods is a ROBOT- which can carry my lunch and basically do all the work. I'll just supervise. G And, if I get really tired, it will carry me out. These robots won't look like Startreck androids- they'll dress up in flannel shirts and blue jeans. There will be male and female robots. You know, like in that movie by Robin Williams- I forgot the name. Since I won't have to do any serious work, I can just focus on enjoying myself out there- grooving on all the good vibes out there. G -- Joe Zorzin http://www.forestmeister.com "Larry Harrell" wrote in message om... Mike H wrote in message ... It's not a matter of being rich - it's a necessity when you have to do a lot of inventory and when you have to use a formalized cruise or inventory program. For instance, here industry all uses the same proprietary program and the FS uses its own unique programs - just tweaked for each Region. When there's a front end for it, it error checks as you go. These things can easily pay for themselves in a year. It's not really a matter of paying for themselves but to "standardize" data collection (especially stand exam and cruise data)and to bring us into the new millenium, kicking and scratching all the way. It's not really a very new idea to take mini-computers into the woods. I remember using an HP palmtop computer set up by a 3P guru. It was pretty slick, adjusting volumes for each marker separately. Of course, if you do a well rounded mix of forestry work - as most sane consultants choose to do, having one is a bit of a luxury. I bet just holding one will make me look more important G. The best thing about the new handhelds is that since they have a trimmed version of Excel onboard, you're no longer tied to proprietary cruise programs. Considering the price those go for, I expect there to soon be some serious free or shareware competition with the big consulting agencies. Also - since the big slowdown, maybe selling forestry software is better than selling forestry... ;( Now, the USFS will be tied to certain official spreadsheets with "tweaked" volume tables instead. With outsourcing on the horizon, the field looks wide open (hint, hint). Maybe not, though. We do have some Excel wizards who could easily build us what the policymakers want us to have (not necessarily what we need, though). I've never been rich enough to use these fancy data recorders. But, what I'd like to know is just how effective they are regarding efficiency? Rather than entering data into a such a tool, I'd rather speak into a tape recorder because I think it would be faster. I'm sure it must take more time to enter data than just talking to your tape recorder. At least here in the Northeast- we have so much lousy weather that good field time is in short supply, so I always want to be as efficient as possible in the field. I always have plenty of office time available to do such data entry. -- Joe Zorzin http://www.forestmeister.com In our western forests, thinning projects generate plenty of data for all those small marked trees. The Head Honchos and bean counters have put a lot of emphasis on getting accurate measurements of trees that are worth about $2.89. Sure, cruiser certification is fine and dandy but, where is the "silvicultural certification" (which insures that they are marking the "right" trees) for timbermarkers? As soon as voice recognition systems are refined, that'll be perfect for ya, Joe. I can see the future of forestry now. Heads-Up-Display from your hardhat. Armed with lasers and mini computers. Real-time satellite imaging. I guess that future isn't really very far off, eh? Larry |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
planting blue rug juniper and blue star juniper | Gardening | |||
FA: Juniper handheld DOS/WinCE field pc | alt.forestry | |||
New Alpha Centauri data | Plant Science | |||
Do the botanists need a XML data modeling/data entry tool? | Plant Science | |||
Do the botanists need a XML data modeling/data entry tool? | Plant Science |