Deforestation a hoax
 

schreef
I'm one of the most rational people you'll ever meet, believe it or
not, and i don't consume junk food.

+ + +
Depends on how "rational" is defined:
"Of, pertaining to, or attained by reasoning"
The factor most influencing the outcome of any proces of reasoning is the
selection of facts, that are put in (garbage in, garbage out).

The less facts that are taken into account the bigger the part played by
'rationality' in any proces of reasoning. So in this light your statement
"I'm one of the most rational people you'll ever meet, believe it or not"
can be taken to read that you disregard the facts entirely. This is
consistent with the rest of your statements.

To help you build up a database of facts (sometimes called "a sense of
reality") this bit of trivia: coffee is consumed as a liquid ("drink" or
"beverage") not eaten ("food"). This liquid "coffee" is low in fat and
calories which means that it does not qualify as a "junk beverage".
PvR

Deforestation a hoax
 

"P van Rijckevorsel" wrote in message . ..
schreef
I'm one of the most rational people you'll ever meet, believe it or
not, and i don't consume junk food.

+ + +
Depends on how "rational" is defined:
"Of, pertaining to, or attained by reasoning"
The factor most influencing the outcome of any proces of reasoning is the
selection of facts, that are put in (garbage in, garbage out).

The less facts that are taken into account the bigger the part played by
'rationality' in any proces of reasoning. So in this light your statement
"I'm one of the most rational people you'll ever meet, believe it or not"
can be taken to read that you disregard the facts entirely. This is
consistent with the rest of your statements.

To help you build up a database of facts (sometimes called "a sense of
reality") this bit of trivia: coffee is consumed as a liquid ("drink" or
"beverage") not eaten ("food"). This liquid "coffee" is low in fat and
calories which means that it does not qualify as a "junk beverage".
PvR

PvR you dumb truck, provide evidence of the health benefits of
caffeine and refined sugar, goodluck, LOL.

There is no proof that a threat of depletion exists globally within
50yrs, provide evidence to counter my assertion, and display your
purported ability to reason.
You've fallen for the hoax like everyone else has.
Don't forget, i'm after proof of a threat of depletion, not just
logging, got it champ?

Deforestation a hoax
 

schreef
I'm one of the most rational people you'll ever meet, believe it or
not, and i don't consume junk food.

"P van Rijckevorsel" wrote
Depends on how "rational" is defined:
"Of, pertaining to, or attained by reasoning"
The factor most influencing the outcome of any proces of reasoning is
the selection of facts, that are put in (garbage in, garbage out).

The less facts that are taken into account the bigger the part played by
'rationality' in any proces of reasoning. So in this light your
statement "I'm one of the most rational people you'll ever meet, believe it
or not" can be taken to read that you disregard the facts entirely. This is
consistent with the rest of your statements.

To help you build up a database of facts (sometimes called "a sense of
reality") this bit of trivia: coffee is consumed as a liquid ("drink" or
"beverage") not eaten ("food"). This liquid "coffee" is low in fat and
calories which means that it does not qualify as a "junk beverage".
PvR

schreef
PvR you dumb truck, provide evidence of the health benefits of
caffeine and refined sugar, goodluck, LOL.

+ + +
Actually I claimed that coffee, as usually consumed, is a liquid. And no, I
cannot prove this to your satisfaction. The rest of the world does accept
that coffee is a liquid and certainly many people drink it.
PvR

Deforestation a hoax
 

"P van Rijckevorsel" wrote in message ...
+ + +
Actually I claimed that coffee, as usually consumed, is a liquid. And no, I
cannot prove this to your satisfaction. The rest of the world does accept
that coffee is a liquid and certainly many people drink it.
PvR

Your thread is a joke.
You are a joke.
You are clueless, coping definitions of philosophy terms marks you as
a non-thinker.

Hurry up and provide "evidence" to counter my logical assertions that
NO threat of depletion exists as counter measures have been relatively
effective.