Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Reticulation systems
I believe I may have a problem with my system here. Now that the water
table is receding thew pump has difficulty in producing enough flow to make the pop-ups pop. A friend peered in to the depths of my bore liner and was able to tell me that the inlet to the pump was far smaller than the delivery pipe to the system. This he claimed would cause a vast reduction in the back pressure. I would like to see the science of all this and hope that someone can point me in the right direction. I did not want to call in a contractor because that will cost me heaps of dollars. Is there a simple answer to all this? Please, save the humour for someone else! Don |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Reticulation systems
g'day don,
is it a submersable pump or above ground pump? i am no expert but just some things i have been told at times: if it is above ground then the bigger the pipe coming into the pump tghe better 2" is usually used. this reduces friction and drag. it is also better for the pump if you have 2" going out as well for the same reasons. also do you have a non-return valve fitted on the outlet side this could help in keeping initial pressure in the line. that's my thoughts len snipped -- happy gardening 'it works for me it could work for you,' "in the end ya' gotta do what ya' gotta do" but consider others and the environment http://hub.dataline.net.au/~gardnlen/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Reticulation systems
"Donald R Smith" wrote in message ... I believe I may have a problem with my system here. Now that the water table is receding thew pump has difficulty in producing enough flow to make the pop-ups pop. Probably due to the suction head increasing therefore getting close to the maximum head rating of the pump. A friend peered in to the depths of my bore liner and was able to tell me that the inlet to the pump was far smaller than the delivery pipe to the system. This he claimed would cause a vast reduction in the back pressure. Changing the suction line probably wouldn't improve things as you would still be trying to lift the same head of water. Unless it is too small which would increase the restriction to flow, this would cause cavitation (read footnote) to the pump and eventually destroy it. If it has been ok in the past, I wouldn't be too concerned. Look at other things first. Actually, a larger delivery line is better, giving less restriction to flow you would get increased flow to the take off points for the pop ups and better back pressure. I would like to see the science of all this and hope that someone can point me in the right direction. Do you have one line and a foot valve down the bore? Or do you have a jet pump at the bottom (2 lines going down the bore, 2 different sizes) for self priming. I did not want to call in a contractor because that will cost me heaps of dollars. Is there a simple answer to all this? Honestly, there is no simple answer, But, because the water level has dropped, the ability for the pump to lift (actually, the ability for the pump to create enough vacuum to allow the air pressure (atmospheric pressure) to push the water up the line and into the pump) has reduced. Maybe a larger capacity pump might be the answer. Do you know the distance from the pump to the water level (Not the length of the suction line, which would be longer), compare that with the rating of the pump..... Oh, Another thing, what is the condition of the pump inside, any sign of cavitation, are the impellers ok, is there a buildup of any rust, calcium, etc inside the pump. If the fittings are galvanised fittings there may be a buildup inside the fittings reducing the capacity of the pump Good luck! Gerard Footnote: Cavitation is the formation of vapour bubbles within a liquid at low-pressure regions that occur in places where the liquid has been accelerated to high velocities, as in the operation of centrifugal pumps, water turbines, and marine propellers. Cavitation is undesirable because it produces extensive erosion of the rotating blades, additional noise from the resultant knocking and vibrations, and a significant reduction of efficiency because it distorts the flow pattern. The cavities form when the pressure of the liquid has been reduced to its vapour pressure; they expand as the pressure is further reduced along with the flow and suddenly collapse when they reach regions of higher pressure. The sudden growth and collapse of these vapour cavities cause the extreme pressures that pit the metal surfaces exposed to the cavitating liquid. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Reticulation systems
"len brauer" wrote in message ... g'day don, is it a submersable pump or above ground pump? i am no expert but just some things i have been told at times: if it is above ground then the bigger the pipe coming into the pump tghe better 2" is usually used. this reduces friction and drag. it is also better for the pump if you have 2" going out as well for the same reasons. also do you have a non-return valve fitted on the outlet side this could help in keeping initial pressure in the line. I agree with all but the non-return valve, this must be placed at the bottom of the suction line, normally refered as the foot valve, although both valves (foot, non-return/check) are identical in principle, inline valves are usually refered to as check or non-return valves and are usually spring assisted, but the foot valve as stated previously is placed at the foot of a suction line and is not spring assisted, only by gravity and the head of the fluid. Regards Gerard |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Reticulation systems
Arvo All,
Two major leaks have been detected. One at a joint in the 2" main at the rear of the house. The main is 500mms down and would have made the leak difficult to detect. The other was in the front yard at a crossover where the 1 1/4" main fed two 1" feeds to a sprinkler line either side. When originally installed, a Conifer was planted immediately above it shortly afterwards. Eight months ago I removed the 40 foot tree and digging through a maze of roots, found that the original crossover joint was covered by the old stump and only just visible. It was impossible to get at but was the source of another major leak. Now the main has been re-fed and is on top of the old stump (not pretty) but the only way it could be achieved without a heck of a lot of work and creating two new feeds. My retic man then showed me just how much water was leaking up the side of the pop-ups. Now they have all been replaced and everything seems to be jake. I fell base over apex by putting my foot into one of the bomb craters I had to dig all around the front yard. Today I'm resting. There is a two inch GI pipe down the hole and a flange or something which stops a string being lowered any further. Opinion has it that the obstruction is the top of the spear/non-return valve. No wiser! The neighbour whose bore is right over the fence from mine tells me the water is down to 12 1/2 feet at the moment. Thanks for all of the help and advice. Cheers, Don |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
sprinkler systems | Lawns | |||
Reticulation systems | Australia | |||
Irrigation systems | Orchids | |||
New Website : MODERNIZATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEMS | sci.agriculture | |||
AD: I repair lawn sprinkler systems | Texas |