GardenBanter.co.uk

GardenBanter.co.uk (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/)
-   Bamboo (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/bamboo/)
-   -   some id questions (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/bamboo/96356-some-id-questions.html)

mr gulash 23-06-2005 03:58 PM

some id questions
 
Hey,

I've got a couple bamboos that I'm uncertain of the identification. I
figured I'd post some pictures, but what should I be focusing on? If I
do a wide shot of the whole plant, and then a culm/leaf close up, is
that enough? Any thoughts are appreciated,

- gulash


Travis 24-06-2005 09:24 AM

mr gulash wrote:
Hey,

I've got a couple bamboos that I'm uncertain of the identification.
I figured I'd post some pictures, but what should I be focusing on?
If I do a wide shot of the whole plant, and then a culm/leaf close
up, is that enough? Any thoughts are appreciated,

- gulash


It is my understanding that without flowers some bamboos are very
difficult to identify exactly.

--

Travis in Shoreline Washington


BambooKeijzer 30-06-2005 05:57 PM

I recommend to take a close picture shot of a new shoot, or otherwise
of the culm with two internodes and side branches.

Travis 30-06-2005 06:30 PM

BambooKeijzer wrote:
I recommend to take a close picture shot of a new shoot, or
otherwise of the culm with two internodes and side branches.


Not likely to be very helpful.

--

Travis in Shoreline Washington

BambooKeijzer 01-07-2005 07:22 AM

But it may be sufficient, especially the new shoots. Furthermore, you
can feel the culm too. The Phyllostachys aureosulcata species have a
sandpaper feel. You can push your hand down, and it feels rough, but
you hardly can move your hand upwards.
Give it a go.


mr gulash 01-07-2005 04:52 PM

thanks for the feedback. i happened to be at bamboo headquarters
yesterday and described my unknown bamboo, and they were quite certain
it is a bambusa vulgaris 'vittata'.

http://www.bambooheadquarters.com/photoweb/bavv.htm

apparently the relevant bits to them were a) size of grown plant, b)
basic coloring, c) culm ( grooved or not ), d) growing location, e)
propagation method. since it was propagated via culm cutting this gave
them the "ah ha" they were looking for. i was relieved.

picked up a couple of nice pleioblastus while i was there... =)


Tihomir 14-07-2005 03:19 PM

Come on Trevis. If identification without flower would be impossible, one
could just wait for decades. There's often at least something we can tell
just looking at young shoots or branches


"BambooKeijzer" wrote in message
oups.com...
But it may be sufficient, especially the new shoots. Furthermore, you
can feel the culm too. The Phyllostachys aureosulcata species have a
sandpaper feel. You can push your hand down, and it feels rough, but
you hardly can move your hand upwards.
Give it a go.




Travis 14-07-2005 06:03 PM

Tihomir wrote:
Come on Trevis. If identification without flower would be
impossible, one could just wait for decades. There's often at least
something we can tell just looking at young shoots or branches


"BambooKeijzer" wrote in message
oups.com...
But it may be sufficient, especially the new shoots. Furthermore,
you can feel the culm too. The Phyllostachys aureosulcata species
have a sandpaper feel. You can push your hand down, and it feels
rough, but you hardly can move your hand upwards.
Give it a go.


I'm no taxonomy expert but people on the bamboo mailing lists I
subscribe to have said it many times. Some bamboos can only be
identified for sure by seeing all the physical characteristics including
the flower. That is just the way of bamboo.

--


Travis in Shoreline Washington


RainLover 15-07-2005 03:20 PM

On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:03:48 GMT, "Travis"
wrote:

Tihomir wrote:
Come on Trevis. If identification without flower would be
impossible, one could just wait for decades. There's often at least
something we can tell just looking at young shoots or branches


"BambooKeijzer" wrote in message
oups.com...
But it may be sufficient, especially the new shoots. Furthermore,
you can feel the culm too. The Phyllostachys aureosulcata species
have a sandpaper feel. You can push your hand down, and it feels
rough, but you hardly can move your hand upwards.
Give it a go.


I'm no taxonomy expert but people on the bamboo mailing lists I
subscribe to have said it many times. Some bamboos can only be
identified for sure by seeing all the physical characteristics including
the flower. That is just the way of bamboo.


Am I the ONLY person who cracked up over this 'flower id' thing?

Someone asks: "what sort of bamboo is this"
Answer: "show us a flower from it"
Someone: Okay, here is a flower.
Answer, "It's Yellow Grove, but since you showed me a flower it's now
going to DIE."



Hehhe

James, Seattle

Tihomir 15-07-2005 03:21 PM


"Travis" wrote in message
news:UVwBe.20825$O56.10221@trnddc07...
Tihomir wrote:
Come on Trevis. If identification without flower would be
impossible, one could just wait for decades. There's often at least
something we can tell just looking at young shoots or branches


"BambooKeijzer" wrote in message
oups.com...
But it may be sufficient, especially the new shoots. Furthermore,
you can feel the culm too. The Phyllostachys aureosulcata species
have a sandpaper feel. You can push your hand down, and it feels
rough, but you hardly can move your hand upwards.
Give it a go.


I'm no taxonomy expert but people on the bamboo mailing lists I subscribe
to have said it many times. Some bamboos can only be identified for sure
by seeing all the physical characteristics including the flower. That is
just the way of bamboo.

--


Travis in Shoreline Washington


That's my point. Some bamboos can only be identified by seeds and flower.
But many common species can be rather reliably identified by their shoots
and branches. That is just the way of bamboo. ;-)

Never mind...

Tihomir



Tihomir 18-07-2005 02:06 PM


"RainLover" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:03:48 GMT, "Travis"
wrote:

Tihomir wrote:
Come on Trevis. If identification without flower would be
impossible, one could just wait for decades. There's often at least
something we can tell just looking at young shoots or branches


"BambooKeijzer" wrote in message
oups.com...
But it may be sufficient, especially the new shoots. Furthermore,
you can feel the culm too. The Phyllostachys aureosulcata species
have a sandpaper feel. You can push your hand down, and it feels
rough, but you hardly can move your hand upwards.
Give it a go.


I'm no taxonomy expert but people on the bamboo mailing lists I
subscribe to have said it many times. Some bamboos can only be
identified for sure by seeing all the physical characteristics including
the flower. That is just the way of bamboo.


Am I the ONLY person who cracked up over this 'flower id' thing?

Someone asks: "what sort of bamboo is this"
Answer: "show us a flower from it"
Someone: Okay, here is a flower.
Answer, "It's Yellow Grove, but since you showed me a flower it's now
going to DIE."



Hehhe

James, Seattle


Good point ;)

Tihomir,
Croatia, Asia



Throckmorton P. Ruddygore 01-08-2005 03:39 AM

mr gulash wrote in news:2005070108523216807%hi@therenet:


http://www.bambooheadquarters.com/photoweb/bavv.htm


picked up a couple of nice pleioblastus while i was there... =)


Howdy Mr Gulash
Thanks for the link.

--
Throckmorton P. Ruddygore


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter