Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[IBC] Latent incompatibility
Hello Lisa:
Japanese five-needle pine (name used in the bonsai world), is also called Japanese white pine (name used by horticulturists in Western countries), Pinus parviflora, (which has five needles per fascicle) is generally compatible with pines with two needles per fascicle. As far as I know, the cutivar 'Zuisho' is not compatible with pines with two needles per fascicle. In Japan 'Zuisho' is always grafted on to seedlings of Japanese five-needle pine, NOT Japanese black pine. I have tried this here in the US and found when Japanese black pine is used, the resulting small plants die quickly, while plants grafted on to seedlings of Eastern white pine, (Pinus strobus) grew fine. Obtaining seedlings of Pinus parviflora is difficult and expensive. Historically, the Japanese five-needle pine has been grafted in Japan for well over 300 years for bonsai and gardens. The Japanese have selected cultivars for many characteristics such as needles, bark, growth habit, etc. Normally, Japanese five-needle pine is grafted on to Japanese black pine, Pinus thunbergi, which has two needles per fascicle for bonsai in Japan because it is more vigorous, cheaper and easier to find than seedlings of Pinus parviflora. The Japanese have even used Japanese red pine, Pinus densiflora for understock as well. Generally, there is no incompatibility with Pinus parviflora with Pinus thunbergi. However, 'Zuisho' is not compatible. Also, there are, perhaps 100 dwarf cultivars (called Yatsubusa) in the bonsai world). Nearly all of them are grafted on to Japanese black pine in Japan, while the same cultivars propagated in Western countries are grafted on to Pinus strobus. Both grow well. In Western countries most propagators ALWAYS graft pine with two needles onto pines with two needles and pines with five needles on to pines with five needles. This is what has been done, and it works, why change it. Well the Japanese bonsai propagators also have the same attitude, and have been using Japanese black pine for understock for centuries. I have not seen any of the grafted Pinus parviflora die after 15 to 20 years as your horticulturist stated, but I have only been growing and studying bonsai for 40 years.... How long has he been studying the compatibility of these two pines? As far as why graft and to grow seedlings, we use cultivars of Pinus parviflora because they are far superior to the seedlings which vary tremendously. Most have twisted needles, which are not the best for bonsai. Grafted bonsai are often sought from Japan, not only because of the shape and rare cultivars, but because of the graft union (place where graft is made). In the bonsai world, both in Japan and the US, bonsai propagators make the graft union in the crown of the plant, directly on the roots to avoid an ungly graft scar. Yes, I know, some commercially made grafted bonsai in Japan are made much higher, sometimes up to the first branch. But, you have to realize that these commercially bonsai are NOT used in Japan, they are always exported to Western countries, where they are highly prized. In Japan they are not accepted and only grown for export and often also used as disposable holiday gifts for the New Year Season in January. These bonsai are generally disposed of after the holidays. Westerners like them so the Japanese export them because they can make money from them. Look at the bonsai exhibited in Japanese shows, how many grafted Pinus parviflora do you see? In Western countries propagators graft up higher on the understock because it is easier, and that is how they were taught from European grafters who eventually taught all the US grafters. It was far too time consuming to find the roots, then graft that far low. Besides, who cares about the "graft union" because the plants are going to be in a garden. Remember these are propagators for garden use, not bonsai propagators. Hope this helps! Bill ************************************************** ****************************** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mike Page ++++ ************************************************** ****************************** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
[IBC] Latent incompatibility
Many thanks, Bill. I shall forward your answer to my fellow club members,
one of whom is a bonsai nurseryman. They will no doubt be very interested. I'll also send it to the Melbourne groups. Your explanation concerning the grafting method of the West once more brought it home to me how difficult it can be to grow bonsai from ordinary nursery material. The long, and comparatively coarse, Pinus thunbergii understock contrasts i.m.h.o. quite unpleasantly with the smoother bark and more slender trunk of Pinus parviflora. I have tried to make the transition from the one to the other less obvious by scoring the trunk just above the graft, hoping that the scar tissue would simulate the rougher bark of the stock, but so far with no satisfactory result. I guess the only remedy is to hide the graft by bringing down the foliage. Lisa "William Valavanis" wrote in message ... Hello Lisa: Japanese five-needle pine (name used in the bonsai world), is also called Japanese white pine (name used by horticulturists in Western countries), Pinus parviflora, (which has five needles per fascicle) is generally compatible with pines with two needles per fascicle. As far as I know, the cutivar 'Zuisho' is not compatible with pines with two needles per fascicle. In Japan 'Zuisho' is always grafted on to seedlings of Japanese five-needle pine, NOT Japanese black pine. I have tried this here in the US and found when Japanese black pine is used, the resulting small plants die quickly, while plants grafted on to seedlings of Eastern white pine, (Pinus strobus) grew fine. Obtaining seedlings of Pinus parviflora is difficult and expensive. Historically, the Japanese five-needle pine has been grafted in Japan for well over 300 years for bonsai and gardens. The Japanese have selected cultivars for many characteristics such as needles, bark, growth habit, etc. Normally, Japanese five-needle pine is grafted on to Japanese black pine, Pinus thunbergi, which has two needles per fascicle for bonsai in Japan because it is more vigorous, cheaper and easier to find than seedlings of Pinus parviflora. The Japanese have even used Japanese red pine, Pinus densiflora for understock as well. Generally, there is no incompatibility with Pinus parviflora with Pinus thunbergi. However, 'Zuisho' is not compatible. Also, there are, perhaps 100 dwarf cultivars (called Yatsubusa) in the bonsai world). Nearly all of them are grafted on to Japanese black pine in Japan, while the same cultivars propagated in Western countries are grafted on to Pinus strobus. Both grow well. In Western countries most propagators ALWAYS graft pine with two needles onto pines with two needles and pines with five needles on to pines with five needles. This is what has been done, and it works, why change it. Well the Japanese bonsai propagators also have the same attitude, and have been using Japanese black pine for understock for centuries. I have not seen any of the grafted Pinus parviflora die after 15 to 20 years as your horticulturist stated, but I have only been growing and studying bonsai for 40 years.... How long has he been studying the compatibility of these two pines? As far as why graft and to grow seedlings, we use cultivars of Pinus parviflora because they are far superior to the seedlings which vary tremendously. Most have twisted needles, which are not the best for bonsai. Grafted bonsai are often sought from Japan, not only because of the shape and rare cultivars, but because of the graft union (place where graft is made). In the bonsai world, both in Japan and the US, bonsai propagators make the graft union in the crown of the plant, directly on the roots to avoid an ungly graft scar. Yes, I know, some commercially made grafted bonsai in Japan are made much higher, sometimes up to the first branch. But, you have to realize that these commercially bonsai are NOT used in Japan, they are always exported to Western countries, where they are highly prized. In Japan they are not accepted and only grown for export and often also used as disposable holiday gifts for the New Year Season in January. These bonsai are generally disposed of after the holidays. Westerners like them so the Japanese export them because they can make money from them. Look at the bonsai exhibited in Japanese shows, how many grafted Pinus parviflora do you see? In Western countries propagators graft up higher on the understock because it is easier, and that is how they were taught from European grafters who eventually taught all the US grafters. It was far too time consuming to find the roots, then graft that far low. Besides, who cares about the "graft union" because the plants are going to be in a garden. Remember these are propagators for garden use, not bonsai propagators. Hope this helps! Bill ************************************************** ************************** **** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mike Page ++++ ************************************************** ************************** **** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
[IBC] Latent incompatibility
At 06:18 PM 6/7/03 +1000, Lisa Kanis wrote:
At the recent Australian Associated Bonsai Clubs' annual Seminar, we had a talk by Leo Coolwyn, who is a wholesale nurseryman with a great deal of experience in growing and propagating conifers. One of the subjects he spoke about was the latent incompatibility of the Japanese Black Pine and the Japanese White Pine when it comes to grafting. The 5 needle White Pine is commonly grafted onto the more vigorous 2 needle Black Pine and for a number of years this appears to be working well, but it has been found that eventually, the White Pine gradually deteriorates and dies. This may happen as late as 15 to 20 years after the graft has taken. According to Mr Coolwyn, pine grafting has to be specific, i.e. 5 needle pines onto 5 needle pines, 2 needle onto 2 needle, and so on. I wonder about the source of the information. Is this anecdotal, or has there been some serious study of the alleged problem? I have seen many P. parviflora grafted to P. thunbergii that are older than 15 to 20 years. Any time you see a white pine semi cascade with rough bark and a peculiar coiled pattern (from an imbedded wire) with a transition to smooth bark, it is P.p. to P.t. Most of these come from Japan. http://www.evergreengardenworks.com/...s/rebs0214.jpg The tree above is probably forty to fifty years old. The only way to know for sure if there is a problem is to cut open the graft union of a tree that has 'failed' and study the pattern. I asked on which pine the Japanese White could be grafted as there aren't that many 5 needle pines to choose from, and whether in the end there was any sense in grafting it at all. The answer was that, at the moment, that was the big question, but the matter was being researched. In the US, the pine of choice is P. strobus, but I have also used P. strobiformis (both five needled white pine). Of course it can be grafted to itself, P.p. to P.p. to obtain cultivars, but this doesn't solve the problems that P.p species has when growing in other than its native habitat. I am posting this because I wonder if more is known by specialised horticulturists in N.America. I am continuing to graft to P.p. to P.t. No observed problems in the first five years. In fact the opposite has been true. They have done much better on P.t. than on anything else, but of course if there is a latent incompatibility, it won't show for many more years. It is difficult for me to believe that if there is a problem, it has not been documented by the Japanese who have been doing this for decades if not centuries. Additionally, I have two questions: 1) There have been many complaints about the difficulty of growing the Japanese White Pine. Could the above have anything to do with it? The 'difficult' part is certainly true, but I have just as much trouble growing seedlings as the grafts. I don't think this is the problem since my P.p. to P.t. grafts have been more vigorous and better survivors than any of the other grafts or seedlings. What I have found about P.p., at least in containers, is that you cannot expose them to direct sunlight when it is very hot (100+F). The needles will scorch and the roots will die from the overheated pots. Growing them under 30 to 40% shadecloth all day seems to solve this. I have had very few losses since keeping them under shadecloth all spring, summer, and fall. They are still as vigorous, if not more so. 2) A lot of people swear by the importance of buying trees imported from Japan. I have always wondered why. Do Japanese grafting methods differ from those used in the West, by any chance? No, I doubt if that is the answer to the problem, if there is one. The method of course is the side veneer graft, the Japanese use it too. Are Japanese trees more viable? No. I will venture a guess. P.p are difficult to grow outside their native habitat, _period_. Your speaker, I take it, is speaking from AU experience. Most of AU has a Mediterranean climate similar to mine, that is, very hot dry summer, long cool wet winter, just like ours. This is a most difficult climate for P.p. This species often dies for no apparent reason. It would be quite easy to blame it on graft incompatibilty, but I want proof. I won't believe it until I see pictures of the wood pattern in the graft union. It should be quite obvious. I will relate a similar situation. For years US Northwest nurserymen, all respected folk and otherwise good human beings, maintained that you couldn't grow Japanese maple cultivars on their own roots, they were too weak and would eventually die. Of course all these folk had a lot invested in grafting Acer palmatum cultivars. I'm not saying this is deliberate deceit, however, it doesn influence your view of the world. After decades of successful cutting production of A.p., you rarely hear this view anymore. The big problem is not having the cuttings survive, it's getting them to root in the first place. Nearly all of the broadleaf cultivars are happy as clams on their own roots and not too difficult to propagate. You don't see the dissectum cuttings for the simple reason that they are nearly impossible to root and grafting is the onlly commerically viable option. Brent in Northern California Evergreen Gardenworks USDA Zone 8 Sunset Zone 14 http://www.EvergreenGardenworks.com ************************************************** ****************************** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mike Page ++++ ************************************************** ****************************** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
[IBC] Latent incompatibility
At 07:02 AM 6/7/03 -0400, William Valavanis wrote:
Bill Thanks for replying, I knew you would have some cogent remarks. ...As far as I know, the cutivar 'Zuisho' is not compatible with pines with two needles per fascicle. In Japan 'Zuisho' is always grafted on to seedlings of Japanese five-needle pine, NOT Japanese black pine. I have tried this here in the US and found when Japanese black pine is used, the resulting small plants die quickly, while plants grafted on to seedlings of Eastern white pine, (Pinus strobus) grew fine. ... Could you elucidate? What age are they failing? What is the nature of the failure? Are the grafts taking, and then dying? Anything you can add would be greatly appreciated. Brent in Northern California Evergreen Gardenworks USDA Zone 8 Sunset Zone 14 http://www.EvergreenGardenworks.com ************************************************** ****************************** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mike Page ++++ ************************************************** ****************************** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
[IBC] Latent incompatibility
Thank you very much, Brent.
I am beginning to feel like a perfect fool regarding this grafting question, but at the same time I'm thinking myself quite privileged for having received such great answers. I shall try to contact Leo Coolwyn and the chief organiser of the AABC 2003 Seminar in Melbourne, who is a dyed-in-the-wool bonsai nurseryman, to see if I can get some more info on Coolwyn's findings. Lisa "Brent Walston" wrote in message ic.net... At 06:18 PM 6/7/03 +1000, Lisa Kanis wrote: At the recent Australian Associated Bonsai Clubs' annual Seminar, we had a talk by Leo Coolwyn, who is a wholesale nurseryman with a great deal of experience in growing and propagating conifers. One of the subjects he spoke about was the latent incompatibility of the Japanese Black Pine and the Japanese White Pine when it comes to grafting. The 5 needle White Pine is commonly grafted onto the more vigorous 2 needle Black Pine and for a number of years this appears to be working well, but it has been found that eventually, the White Pine gradually deteriorates and dies. This may happen as late as 15 to 20 years after the graft has taken. According to Mr Coolwyn, pine grafting has to be specific, i.e. 5 needle pines onto 5 needle pines, 2 needle onto 2 needle, and so on. I wonder about the source of the information. Is this anecdotal, or has there been some serious study of the alleged problem? I have seen many P. parviflora grafted to P. thunbergii that are older than 15 to 20 years. Any time you see a white pine semi cascade with rough bark and a peculiar coiled pattern (from an imbedded wire) with a transition to smooth bark, it is P.p. to P.t. Most of these come from Japan. http://www.evergreengardenworks.com/...s/rebs0214.jpg The tree above is probably forty to fifty years old. The only way to know for sure if there is a problem is to cut open the graft union of a tree that has 'failed' and study the pattern. I asked on which pine the Japanese White could be grafted as there aren't that many 5 needle pines to choose from, and whether in the end there was any sense in grafting it at all. The answer was that, at the moment, that was the big question, but the matter was being researched. In the US, the pine of choice is P. strobus, but I have also used P. strobiformis (both five needled white pine). Of course it can be grafted to itself, P.p. to P.p. to obtain cultivars, but this doesn't solve the problems that P.p species has when growing in other than its native habitat. I am posting this because I wonder if more is known by specialised horticulturists in N.America. I am continuing to graft to P.p. to P.t. No observed problems in the first five years. In fact the opposite has been true. They have done much better on P.t. than on anything else, but of course if there is a latent incompatibility, it won't show for many more years. It is difficult for me to believe that if there is a problem, it has not been documented by the Japanese who have been doing this for decades if not centuries. Additionally, I have two questions: 1) There have been many complaints about the difficulty of growing the Japanese White Pine. Could the above have anything to do with it? The 'difficult' part is certainly true, but I have just as much trouble growing seedlings as the grafts. I don't think this is the problem since my P.p. to P.t. grafts have been more vigorous and better survivors than any of the other grafts or seedlings. What I have found about P.p., at least in containers, is that you cannot expose them to direct sunlight when it is very hot (100+F). The needles will scorch and the roots will die from the overheated pots. Growing them under 30 to 40% shadecloth all day seems to solve this. I have had very few losses since keeping them under shadecloth all spring, summer, and fall. They are still as vigorous, if not more so. 2) A lot of people swear by the importance of buying trees imported from Japan. I have always wondered why. Do Japanese grafting methods differ from those used in the West, by any chance? No, I doubt if that is the answer to the problem, if there is one. The method of course is the side veneer graft, the Japanese use it too. Are Japanese trees more viable? No. I will venture a guess. P.p are difficult to grow outside their native habitat, _period_. Your speaker, I take it, is speaking from AU experience. Most of AU has a Mediterranean climate similar to mine, that is, very hot dry summer, long cool wet winter, just like ours. This is a most difficult climate for P.p. This species often dies for no apparent reason. It would be quite easy to blame it on graft incompatibilty, but I want proof. I won't believe it until I see pictures of the wood pattern in the graft union. It should be quite obvious. I will relate a similar situation. For years US Northwest nurserymen, all respected folk and otherwise good human beings, maintained that you couldn't grow Japanese maple cultivars on their own roots, they were too weak and would eventually die. Of course all these folk had a lot invested in grafting Acer palmatum cultivars. I'm not saying this is deliberate deceit, however, it doesn influence your view of the world. After decades of successful cutting production of A.p., you rarely hear this view anymore. The big problem is not having the cuttings survive, it's getting them to root in the first place. Nearly all of the broadleaf cultivars are happy as clams on their own roots and not too difficult to propagate. You don't see the dissectum cuttings for the simple reason that they are nearly impossible to root and grafting is the onlly commerically viable option. Brent in Northern California Evergreen Gardenworks USDA Zone 8 Sunset Zone 14 http://www.EvergreenGardenworks.com ************************************************** ************************** **** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mike Page ++++ ************************************************** ************************** **** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
[IBC] Latent incompatibility
Hi sorry to intrude but I have read also that the Penta are better grafted onto
another penta as they have the tendency to split from black pine stock ... I have one Go-yo that was labelled born in 1965 when I bought it, and is still fine and have since 20 years the trunk is huger than a huge fist and apparently has been grafted as the upword bark is smooth and the down one has scales ! but it is veyr hard to see as is covered by thick branches It is in this book by Abe Kurackici but edited apparently only in Italian ( I have a copy) " How to make a Pine Bonsai " (Come creare un Bonsai di Pino )( penthaphilla as deals only about penthaphilla) The Chapters starts in Black Grafted Bonsais The Penthaphilla Pine must be grafted on a Penthaphilla Generally is grafted on a black pine, but such a bonsai will never be well accepte, because even after houndreds of years one can notice the grafting point. These Bonsais are defined Tsigimono ( grafted ) or TSUKURIMONO ( artificial) The bark of both pines will never be even /equal as well as the difference due to the the roots system, If grafting is require ( penta on a black pine root) is the very best to practice it as low as possible near the roots The joint between two penta will disappers with time , with black pine some problems might be rising later .. and he adds some sketch that show how they can split . or grow disgraciously os swollen in the grating point Theo the chapterLisa Kanis wrote: Thank you very much, Brent. I am beginning to feel like a perfect fool regarding this grafting question, but at the same time I'm thinking myself quite privileged for having received such great answers. I shall try to contact Leo Coolwyn and the chief organiser of the AABC 2003 Seminar in Melbourne, who is a dyed-in-the-wool bonsai nurseryman, to see if I can get some more info on Coolwyn's findings. Lisa "Brent Walston" wrote in message ic.net... At 06:18 PM 6/7/03 +1000, Lisa Kanis wrote: At the recent Australian Associated Bonsai Clubs' annual Seminar, we had a talk by Leo Coolwyn, who is a wholesale nurseryman with a great deal of experience in growing and propagating conifers. One of the subjects he spoke about was the latent incompatibility of the Japanese Black Pine and the Japanese White Pine when it comes to grafting. The 5 needle White Pine is commonly grafted onto the more vigorous 2 needle Black Pine and for a number of years this appears to be working well, but it has been found that eventually, the White Pine gradually deteriorates and dies. This may happen as late as 15 to 20 years after the graft has taken. According to Mr Coolwyn, pine grafting has to be specific, i.e. 5 needle pines onto 5 needle pines, 2 needle onto 2 needle, and so on. I wonder about the source of the information. Is this anecdotal, or has there been some serious study of the alleged problem? I have seen many P. parviflora grafted to P. thunbergii that are older than 15 to 20 years. Any time you see a white pine semi cascade with rough bark and a peculiar coiled pattern (from an imbedded wire) with a transition to smooth bark, it is P.p. to P.t. Most of these come from Japan. http://www.evergreengardenworks.com/...s/rebs0214.jpg The tree above is probably forty to fifty years old. The only way to know for sure if there is a problem is to cut open the graft union of a tree that has 'failed' and study the pattern. I asked on which pine the Japanese White could be grafted as there aren't that many 5 needle pines to choose from, and whether in the end there was any sense in grafting it at all. The answer was that, at the moment, that was the big question, but the matter was being researched. In the US, the pine of choice is P. strobus, but I have also used P. strobiformis (both five needled white pine). Of course it can be grafted to itself, P.p. to P.p. to obtain cultivars, but this doesn't solve the problems that P.p species has when growing in other than its native habitat. I am posting this because I wonder if more is known by specialised horticulturists in N.America. I am continuing to graft to P.p. to P.t. No observed problems in the first five years. In fact the opposite has been true. They have done much better on P.t. than on anything else, but of course if there is a latent incompatibility, it won't show for many more years. It is difficult for me to believe that if there is a problem, it has not been documented by the Japanese who have been doing this for decades if not centuries. Additionally, I have two questions: 1) There have been many complaints about the difficulty of growing the Japanese White Pine. Could the above have anything to do with it? The 'difficult' part is certainly true, but I have just as much trouble growing seedlings as the grafts. I don't think this is the problem since my P.p. to P.t. grafts have been more vigorous and better survivors than any of the other grafts or seedlings. What I have found about P.p., at least in containers, is that you cannot expose them to direct sunlight when it is very hot (100+F). The needles will scorch and the roots will die from the overheated pots. Growing them under 30 to 40% shadecloth all day seems to solve this. I have had very few losses since keeping them under shadecloth all spring, summer, and fall. They are still as vigorous, if not more so. 2) A lot of people swear by the importance of buying trees imported from Japan. I have always wondered why. Do Japanese grafting methods differ from those used in the West, by any chance? No, I doubt if that is the answer to the problem, if there is one. The method of course is the side veneer graft, the Japanese use it too. Are Japanese trees more viable? No. I will venture a guess. P.p are difficult to grow outside their native habitat, _period_. Your speaker, I take it, is speaking from AU experience. Most of AU has a Mediterranean climate similar to mine, that is, very hot dry summer, long cool wet winter, just like ours. This is a most difficult climate for P.p. This species often dies for no apparent reason. It would be quite easy to blame it on graft incompatibilty, but I want proof. I won't believe it until I see pictures of the wood pattern in the graft union. It should be quite obvious. I will relate a similar situation. For years US Northwest nurserymen, all respected folk and otherwise good human beings, maintained that you couldn't grow Japanese maple cultivars on their own roots, they were too weak and would eventually die. Of course all these folk had a lot invested in grafting Acer palmatum cultivars. I'm not saying this is deliberate deceit, however, it doesn influence your view of the world. After decades of successful cutting production of A.p., you rarely hear this view anymore. The big problem is not having the cuttings survive, it's getting them to root in the first place. Nearly all of the broadleaf cultivars are happy as clams on their own roots and not too difficult to propagate. You don't see the dissectum cuttings for the simple reason that they are nearly impossible to root and grafting is the onlly commerically viable option. Brent in Northern California Evergreen Gardenworks USDA Zone 8 Sunset Zone 14 http://www.EvergreenGardenworks.com ************************************************** ************************** **** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mike Page ++++ ************************************************** ************************** **** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ -- Think like an Alien and visit your own Planet Theo http://www.byjoke.com/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
[IBC] Latent incompatibility
Folks:
One of my surviving and thriving trees is a P.p. (See prvious post titled Requiem about my other trees) I have been its proud owner for a bit over ten years. It is grafted on Japanese black pine base, quite high up, just as Bill Valavanis described it in his post. When I acquired this tree it was at least 10 to 15 years old. I also had several P.p. that were grown from seed. All but one has died after a couple of years in the Oklahoma weather. Pictures are available on request. Peter Aradi Tulsa, Oklahoma ************************************************** ****************************** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mike Page ++++ ************************************************** ****************************** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
[IBC] Latent incompatibility
Thanks, Peter.
I am very sorry to hear about so many of your trees dying. How the heck does one cope with something like that?? I hope that at least some of your 42 empty pots will soon house some really good bonsai stuff.... Best wishes, Lisa "p.aradi" wrote in message . .. Folks: One of my surviving and thriving trees is a P.p. (See prvious post titled Requiem about my other trees) I have been its proud owner for a bit over ten years. It is grafted on Japanese black pine base, quite high up, just as Bill Valavanis described it in his post. When I acquired this tree it was at least 10 to 15 years old. I also had several P.p. that were grown from seed. All but one has died after a couple of years in the Oklahoma weather. Pictures are available on request. Peter Aradi Tulsa, Oklahoma ************************************************** ************************** **** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mike Page ++++ ************************************************** ************************** **** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
[IBC] ***** [IBC] Was [IBC] ADMIN: sloooow - added Holiday Care | Bonsai | |||
Latent incompatibility | Bonsai | |||
[IBC] FW: [IBC] Mastering Technique (Was [IBC] proposal) | Bonsai | |||
[IBC] FW: [IBC] Mastering Technique (Was [IBC] proposal) | Bonsai | |||
[IBC] To: IBC Enforcer (was: [IBC] Juniper Bonsai life expectancy?) | Bonsai |