Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old 13-04-2010, 08:13 PM posted to rec.gardens.edible
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: May 2009
Posts: 1,085
Default Study Says Overuse Threatens Gains From Modified Crops

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/14/bu...ent/14crop.htm
l?hp

--
Bill Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA

  #2   Report Post  
Old 13-04-2010, 10:05 PM posted to rec.gardens.edible
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,438
Default Study Says Overuse Threatens Gains From Modified Crops

In article ,
Bill who putters wrote:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/14/bu...ent/14crop.htm
l?hp


Two years ago GMO crops were slammed by a report from the University of
Kansas, which incorporated information from the University Nebraska as
well, that stated GMO crops yielded only 90% of the best conventional
crop's yeild (?).
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/04/20/8405
For those with a problem with Common Dreams" I should note that this
article first appeared Sunday, April 20, 2008 in The Independent/UK.

This latest report address the older study: "The report said that when
genetically engineered crops were first introduced (1996 according to
the article, early 1990s according to Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_food) some had lower
yields than conventional varieties, a finding often cited by critics.
But the report said that newer studies showed either a modest increase
in yield or a neutral effect." So says the National Research Council,
which is affiliated with the National Academy of Sciences and provides
advice to the nation under a Congressional charter.

This is a privately owned NPO. I would appreciate any information on
funding.

So, conflicting reports on GMO yields.
----
"Overuse of this seductively simple approach to weed control is starting
to backfire. Use of Roundup, or its generic equivalent, glyphosate, has
skyrocketed to the point that weeds are rapidly becoming resistant to
the chemical. That is rendering the technology less useful, requiring
farmers to start using additional herbicides, some of them more toxic
than glyphosate."

Resistant requiring more and more glyphosate.
"The report said that the use of Roundup Ready crops has led to a huge
increase in the spraying of glyphosate but a nearly concomitant decrease
in the use of other herbicides."
------------
Frontline's "Seeds of Suicide: India's Desperate Farmers" has detailed
some of the struggles facing the Indian farmer.[84] The transition to
using the latest pest-resistant seeds and the necessary herbicides has
been difficult. Farmers have used genetically modified seeds promoted by
Cargill and Monsanto hoping for greater yields. Resulting debts from
such gambles with genetically modified seeds have led some farmers into
the equivalent of indentured servitude.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto#Farmer_suicides
----------
Lastly,
"The Justice Department is investigating whether Monsanto, which has
patents on some of the fundamental technology including the Roundup
Ready system, is violating antitrust laws, unduly increasing prices or
hindering innovation.

The National Research Council report addresses this issue briefly
without mentioning Monsanto. It says that issues of proprietary terms
³has not adversely affected the economic welfare of farmers who adopt
G.E. crops.² But it said there is some evidence that the availability of
nonengineered crops ³may be restricted for some farmers.²
-------

Translation: There aren't sufficient conventional seeds to fill farmers
demands.
--
- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html
  #3   Report Post  
Old 13-04-2010, 11:31 PM posted to rec.gardens.edible
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: May 2009
Posts: 1,085
Default Study Says Overuse Threatens Gains From Modified Crops

In article
,
Billy wrote:


The National Research Council report addresses this issue briefly
without mentioning Monsanto. It says that issues of proprietary terms
³has not adversely affected the economic welfare of farmers who adopt
G.E. crops.² But it said there is some evidence that the availability of
nonengineered crops ³may be restricted for some farmers.²
-------

Translation: There aren't sufficient conventional seeds to fill farmers
demands.


Or our bellies. Nice dream to control weeds in depleted soils but just
like how our plant food went west the souls and nutrients must prevail
or we get empty food that looks good and BG just go up.
I thought about soil vs. souls and it seems to resonate somehow.

Stuff dark and rich clings to my mind
Move it about and I must help it.
A seed a seed
Nothing more than a promise to
Enjoy tomorrows light.

--
Bill Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA

  #4   Report Post  
Old 14-04-2010, 02:14 AM posted to rec.gardens.edible
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Feb 2008
Posts: 544
Default Study Says Overuse Threatens Gains From Modified Crops

In article ,
says...

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/14/bu...ent/14crop.htm
l?hp


Monsanto was doing white papers on the post glyphosate era, years ago.

Unfortunately they're not as stupid as they are evil and unscrupulous.

  #5   Report Post  
Old 14-04-2010, 06:55 AM posted to rec.gardens.edible
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,438
Default Study Says Overuse Threatens Gains From Modified Crops

In article ,
phorbin wrote:

In article ,
says...

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/14/bu...ent/14crop.htm
l?hp


Monsanto was doing white papers on the post glyphosate era, years ago.

Unfortunately they're not as stupid as they are evil and unscrupulous.


http://www.fedcoseeds.com/seeds/monsanto.htm
--
- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html


  #6   Report Post  
Old 14-04-2010, 02:21 PM posted to rec.gardens.edible
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Feb 2008
Posts: 544
Default Study Says Overuse Threatens Gains From Modified Crops

In article wildbilly-C516C9.22553613042010@c-61-68-245-
199.per.connect.net.au, says...
In article ,
phorbin wrote:

In article ,
says...

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/14/bu...ent/14crop.htm
l?hp


Monsanto was doing white papers on the post glyphosate era, years ago.

Unfortunately they're not as stupid as they are evil and unscrupulous.


http://www.fedcoseeds.com/seeds/monsanto.htm


Precisely.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are you looking at me? - birds can tell - says the study [email protected] Australia 1 02-05-2008 09:46 AM
Genetically Modified Crops YH Khoo Plant Science 0 02-09-2003 10:22 AM
Sign petition to USDA to protect crops from being fertilized by pollen from GMO pharm. crops CaringIsTheFirstStep Edible Gardening 4 07-05-2003 05:08 AM
(Long) Study says federal aid was little boon to loggers mike hagen alt.forestry 0 24-01-2003 11:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017