GardenBanter.co.uk

GardenBanter.co.uk (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/)
-   Edible Gardening (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/edible-gardening/)
-   -   The NRAšs Latest Bald-Faced Lie (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/edible-gardening/207030-re-nra%B9s-latest-bald-faced-lie.html)

benj 05-05-2013 03:53 AM

The NRAšs Latest Bald-Faced Lie
 
On Sat, 04 May 2013 17:32:28 -0700, Billy wrote:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a..._game/2013/04/

_80_p
ercent_of_police_oppose_background_checks_no_the_n ra_is_lying.html

An NRA ad claims 80 percent of police in a poll said background checks
will have no effect. Thatšs a lie.


Put down the roach, Billybong. You are the liar here. Rank and file
police NEVER support gun control. They are mostly those white, racist,
goober, toothless, gun-owning goons that you hate. Often they are members
of that "home grown terrorism" organization the NRA!

Your usual lies are by taking results of polls of chiefs of police (Like
the international association of chiefs of police that includes police
from many dictator-run hell-holes) and claiming that their opinion means
all "police" have those opinions. These people (and hence you) never poll
actually police membership. The FOP (police union) have NEVER polled
their members, yet testify regularly in legislative hearings that police
(their members) support these illegal, rights-smashing, laws.

As always when a liar calls others liars, it means nothing.

Of course you are hoping "background checks" WILL have an effect, namely
to provide a list of probable gun owners to be searched "when (not if)
the time comes" for workers to rise up and throw off their chains in a
revolution. Every gun "off the street" in that time will mean a leftist
life saved in the great "collection" of guns after the so-called "buy-
back" fails. Right?

You America-haters are sick. Is that the Internationale I hear?









Bob F 05-05-2013 04:52 AM

The NRAšs Latest Bald-Faced Lie
 
benj wrote:
On Sat, 04 May 2013 17:32:28 -0700, Billy wrote:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a..._game/2013/04/
_80_p
ercent_of_police_oppose_background_checks_no_the_n ra_is_lying.html

An NRA ad claims 80 percent of police in a poll said background
checks will have no effect. Thatšs a lie.


Put down the roach, Billybong. You are the liar here. Rank and file
police NEVER support gun control. They are mostly those white, racist,
goober, toothless, gun-owning goons that you hate. Often they are
members of that "home grown terrorism" organization the NRA!


But then, there are the chiefs.
http://www.policemag.com/channel/wea...-disgrace.aspx



benj 06-05-2013 05:31 AM

The NRAšs Latest Bald-Faced Lie
 
On Sat, 04 May 2013 20:52:58 -0700, Bob F wrote:

But then, there are the chiefs.
http://www.policemag.com/channel/wea...police-chiefs-

call-senate-gun-vote-a-disgrace.aspx

Not fooling anyone here. Chief's of police are just political appointees
who are lap-dogs of politicians. And the virulently anti-gun
International association of chiefs of police always come out loudly with
fake polls of themselves supporting any public disarmament. Then never
poll rank and file police however that they pretend to speak for.
Basically they are all as big political frauds as "billy" is here.
Considering that their menbership includes all manner of police officials
from tin horn dictatorship countries it's no wonder they oppose armed
citizens and support dropping "suspects" out of helicopters.

There is a VALID chief of police organization: http://www.nacoponline.org/

This NATIONAL not INTERNATIONAL organization routinely polls members on
many issues including firearms and always seems to poll very much pro-
gun. These police and others such as the Sheriff's organizations put the
lie to the "international" false flag operation.

In any event why would you believe that chiefs of police speak for the
rank and file? Especially when they have refused to actually poll anyone
but themselves and not even OTHER chiefs? Don't you think that cops can
speak for themselves?



benj 06-05-2013 05:31 AM

The NRAšs Latest Bald-Faced Lie
 
On Sat, 04 May 2013 20:52:58 -0700, Bob F wrote:

But then, there are the chiefs.
http://www.policemag.com/channel/wea...police-chiefs-

call-senate-gun-vote-a-disgrace.aspx

Not fooling anyone here. Chief's of police are just political appointees
who are lap-dogs of politicians. And the virulently anti-gun
International association of chiefs of police always come out loudly with
fake polls of themselves supporting any public disarmament. Then never
poll rank and file police however that they pretend to speak for.
Basically they are all as big political frauds as "billy" is here.
Considering that their menbership includes all manner of police officials
from tin horn dictatorship countries it's no wonder they oppose armed
citizens and support dropping "suspects" out of helicopters.

There is a VALID chief of police organization: http://www.nacoponline.org/

This NATIONAL not INTERNATIONAL organization routinely polls members on
many issues including firearms and always seems to poll very much pro-
gun. These police and others such as the Sheriff's organizations put the
lie to the "international" false flag operation.

In any event why would you believe that chiefs of police speak for the
rank and file? Especially when they have refused to actually poll anyone
but themselves and not even OTHER chiefs? Don't you think that cops can
speak for themselves?




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter