Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old 20-04-2003, 06:09 AM
zooks
 
Posts: n/a
Default Compact Flourecent vs Metal Halide and tank change

I am moving my plants from my 120 Gal to a 55 Gal. Currently there are 6
40watt tubes above the 120. Giving me 2 watts/gal. I do not have CO2.

For the 55 I am considering 2 options.

Option 1: 2 55watt compact fluorescent tubes. Giving me 2 watts/gal.

Option 2: 1 175watt Metal Halide bulb. Giving Just over 3 watts/gal.

Both options would be house in a homemade fixture with a shiny aluminium
reflector.

I have a few lighting questions.

1) If I have sufficient light on my 120 gal (@ 2 watts/gal) will the same
ratio work for the 55 or will I need more/less light?

2) When comparing these two lighting technologies, does one CF watt = one
MH watt as far as plants care?

3) Which is actually better for plant growth? All the hydroponics shops
seem to sell MH exclusively

4) Which is better to for the fish?

5) Which is better for viewing the fish?

6) I am familiar with the heat generated by fluorescent, how much is
generated by MH?

Thanks

--
zooks



  #2   Report Post  
Old 20-04-2003, 06:09 AM
Chuck Gadd
 
Posts: n/a
Default Compact Flourecent vs Metal Halide and tank change

On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:37:03 GMT, "zooks" wrote:

1) If I have sufficient light on my 120 gal (@ 2 watts/gal) will the same
ratio work for the 55 or will I need more/less light?


You will need a little more light. On larger tanks, you need fewer
watts per gallon to give the same amount of light.

2) When comparing these two lighting technologies, does one CF watt = one
MH watt as far as plants care?


For the most part, yes.

6) I am familiar with the heat generated by fluorescent, how much is
generated by MH?


About the same as fluorescent, but it's concentrated in a smaller
space, since the MH fixtures and bulbs are much smaller.


Chuck Gadd
http://www.csd.net/~cgadd/aqua
  #3   Report Post  
Old 20-04-2003, 06:09 AM
Ian Mather
 
Posts: n/a
Default Compact Flourecent vs Metal Halide and tank change

I've heard the same thing regarding large tanks and how they need less Watts
per gallon than a smaller tank. I've always wondered why this is the case?

Ian


1) If I have sufficient light on my 120 gal (@ 2 watts/gal) will the

same
ratio work for the 55 or will I need more/less light?


You will need a little more light. On larger tanks, you need fewer
watts per gallon to give the same amount of light.


Chuck Gadd
http://www.csd.net/~cgadd/aqua





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Planted Tank Focus Group -- Metal halide lighting units fireblade Freshwater Aquaria Plants 1 06-09-2005 03:24 PM
Metal Halide vs Power Compact JockoBailey Freshwater Aquaria Plants 1 05-01-2005 05:06 PM
Metal Halide owners ddaquaria Freshwater Aquaria Plants 1 20-04-2003 06:11 AM
FS:175 Watt Metal Halide Grow Light $70 PreludeDude79 Gardening 0 03-03-2003 06:27 AM
Metal Halide Lights Merrill Speeter Orchids 1 10-02-2003 12:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017