Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Should I remove the carbon from my filter?
Still getting my first planted tank squared away...its looking quite
nice. Should I be removing the activated carbon from my filters? I use a Penquin 170 that has carbon inside the filter material. Does the carbon remove the trace elements and ferts I am adding to the tank? Also, I have been changing the filter monthly as recommended by the LFS but I have read on other forums never to change the filter (because it houses the beneficial bacteria), however I also have a bio wheel. TIA, |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Should I remove the carbon from my filter?
The carbon will remove at least some of the trace nutrients that you may
be putting in (i.e. with PMDD, TMG or Flourish). I haven't run carbon in any of my filters for years now. pete cindy wrote: Still getting my first planted tank squared away...its looking quite nice. Should I be removing the activated carbon from my filters? I use a Penquin 170 that has carbon inside the filter material. Does the carbon remove the trace elements and ferts I am adding to the tank? Also, I have been changing the filter monthly as recommended by the LFS but I have read on other forums never to change the filter (because it houses the beneficial bacteria), however I also have a bio wheel. TIA, |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Should I remove the carbon from my filter?
Take it out for a planted tank. I doesn't really help you, and it may
(especially when its fresh) take significant trace elements out of the water. You are better off with out it. Replace it with some other high surface area filter substrate-- like ceramic beeds or the like. -Bruce Geist "cindy" wrote in message om... Still getting my first planted tank squared away...its looking quite nice. Should I be removing the activated carbon from my filters? I use a Penquin 170 that has carbon inside the filter material. Does the carbon remove the trace elements and ferts I am adding to the tank? Also, I have been changing the filter monthly as recommended by the LFS but I have read on other forums never to change the filter (because it houses the beneficial bacteria), however I also have a bio wheel. TIA, |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Should I remove the carbon from my filter?
If the general consensus is not to use carbon in the planted tank, what is
the best way to remove disolved organics and/or protein "scum"/film from the surface? Would something like PuriGen or Chemi-Pure be acceptable? I had begun to develop a white film on the surface of my tank. I ran carbon for 4 days and the film was completely removed. Would protein skimmers be worth it in planted tanks? What about surface extractor add-ons for canisters such as Eheim? Thanks, Jesse "Bruce Geist" wrote in message ... Take it out for a planted tank. I doesn't really help you, and it may (especially when its fresh) take significant trace elements out of the water. You are better off with out it. Replace it with some other high surface area filter substrate-- like ceramic beeds or the like. -Bruce Geist "cindy" wrote in message om... Still getting my first planted tank squared away...its looking quite nice. Should I be removing the activated carbon from my filters? I use a Penquin 170 that has carbon inside the filter material. Does the carbon remove the trace elements and ferts I am adding to the tank? Also, I have been changing the filter monthly as recommended by the LFS but I have read on other forums never to change the filter (because it houses the beneficial bacteria), however I also have a bio wheel. TIA, |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Should I remove the carbon from my filter?
I am using an Eheim surface extractor with limited success. The surface
extractor I am using tends to clog with leaves and other plant parts. I have added a couple of powerheads to produce small amounts of surface agitation to help keep surface scum at bay. Other than that, I change 40 to 50 percent of my tank water once per week. I still get some film on my water by the end of the week, but its not too bad. Protein skimmers do not work well in freshwater. This is second hand knowledge; I have not tried it myself. Apparently in fresh water, bubbles are not fine enough to make the thing work. As for the other products you mention, I am not familiar with them. What is in them? -Bruce Geist "SlimFlem" wrote in message news:ZJOQ9.593213$NH2.39586@sccrnsc01... If the general consensus is not to use carbon in the planted tank, what is the best way to remove disolved organics and/or protein "scum"/film from the surface? Would something like PuriGen or Chemi-Pure be acceptable? I had begun to develop a white film on the surface of my tank. I ran carbon for 4 days and the film was completely removed. Would protein skimmers be worth it in planted tanks? What about surface extractor add-ons for canisters such as Eheim? Thanks, Jesse "Bruce Geist" wrote in message ... Take it out for a planted tank. I doesn't really help you, and it may (especially when its fresh) take significant trace elements out of the water. You are better off with out it. Replace it with some other high surface area filter substrate-- like ceramic beeds or the like. -Bruce Geist "cindy" wrote in message om... Still getting my first planted tank squared away...its looking quite nice. Should I be removing the activated carbon from my filters? I use a Penquin 170 that has carbon inside the filter material. Does the carbon remove the trace elements and ferts I am adding to the tank? Also, I have been changing the filter monthly as recommended by the LFS but I have read on other forums never to change the filter (because it houses the beneficial bacteria), however I also have a bio wheel. TIA, |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Should I remove the carbon from my filter?
Surface cleaning tip: I keep a length of PVC in the cabinet under my tank
which is capped on one end and is just long enough that, when I slip it over the intake tube to my filter, the open end is about 1/4" below the surface of the water. kush "You can't have everything - where would you put it?" (either in the cabinet under the tank or, according to my spouse, on the basement stairs) Bruce Geist wrote in message ... I am using an Eheim surface extractor with limited success. The surface extractor I am using tends to clog with leaves and other plant parts. I have added a couple of powerheads to produce small amounts of surface agitation to help keep surface scum at bay. Other than that, I change 40 to 50 percent of my tank water once per week. I still get some film on my water by the end of the week, but its not too bad. Protein skimmers do not work well in freshwater. This is second hand knowledge; I have not tried it myself. Apparently in fresh water, bubbles are not fine enough to make the thing work. As for the other products you mention, I am not familiar with them. What is in them? -Bruce Geist "SlimFlem" wrote in message news:ZJOQ9.593213$NH2.39586@sccrnsc01... If the general consensus is not to use carbon in the planted tank, what is the best way to remove disolved organics and/or protein "scum"/film from the surface? Would something like PuriGen or Chemi-Pure be acceptable? I had begun to develop a white film on the surface of my tank. I ran carbon for 4 days and the film was completely removed. Would protein skimmers be worth it in planted tanks? What about surface extractor add-ons for canisters such as Eheim? Thanks, Jesse "Bruce Geist" wrote in message ... Take it out for a planted tank. I doesn't really help you, and it may (especially when its fresh) take significant trace elements out of the water. You are better off with out it. Replace it with some other high surface area filter substrate-- like ceramic beeds or the like. -Bruce Geist "cindy" wrote in message om... Still getting my first planted tank squared away...its looking quite nice. Should I be removing the activated carbon from my filters? I use a Penquin 170 that has carbon inside the filter material. Does the carbon remove the trace elements and ferts I am adding to the tank? Also, I have been changing the filter monthly as recommended by the LFS but I have read on other forums never to change the filter (because it houses the beneficial bacteria), however I also have a bio wheel. TIA, |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Should I remove the carbon from my filter?
Chemi-Pure is an Ion filter medium made by Boyd Enterprises that is supposed to promote aerobic bacterial growth and nitrification as well as remove dissolved organics. It is also supposed to remove copper, metal, ions, odors, all pollution, gases, CO2, etc. The removal of CO2 makes me wonder, but that's why I was hoping someone would throw their 2 cents in if it really does indeed remove CO2 in a way harmful to plants. PuriGen by SeaChem is about the same thing. The guys at the LFS said either can be run, as well as carbon, in a planted tank. I hear so many different opinons about this, it's hard to know what to believe. I use carbon here and there for a few days at a time and all surface scum is removed and doesn't build back up for a couple of weeks. "Bruce Geist" wrote in message ... I am using an Eheim surface extractor with limited success. The surface extractor I am using tends to clog with leaves and other plant parts. I have added a couple of powerheads to produce small amounts of surface agitation to help keep surface scum at bay. Other than that, I change 40 to 50 percent of my tank water once per week. I still get some film on my water by the end of the week, but its not too bad. Protein skimmers do not work well in freshwater. This is second hand knowledge; I have not tried it myself. Apparently in fresh water, bubbles are not fine enough to make the thing work. As for the other products you mention, I am not familiar with them. What is in them? -Bruce Geist "SlimFlem" wrote in message news:ZJOQ9.593213$NH2.39586@sccrnsc01... If the general consensus is not to use carbon in the planted tank, what is the best way to remove disolved organics and/or protein "scum"/film from the surface? Would something like PuriGen or Chemi-Pure be acceptable? I had begun to develop a white film on the surface of my tank. I ran carbon for 4 days and the film was completely removed. Would protein skimmers be worth it in planted tanks? What about surface extractor add-ons for canisters such as Eheim? Thanks, Jesse "Bruce Geist" wrote in message ... Take it out for a planted tank. I doesn't really help you, and it may (especially when its fresh) take significant trace elements out of the water. You are better off with out it. Replace it with some other high surface area filter substrate-- like ceramic beeds or the like. -Bruce Geist "cindy" wrote in message om... Still getting my first planted tank squared away...its looking quite nice. Should I be removing the activated carbon from my filters? I use a Penquin 170 that has carbon inside the filter material. Does the carbon remove the trace elements and ferts I am adding to the tank? Also, I have been changing the filter monthly as recommended by the LFS but I have read on other forums never to change the filter (because it houses the beneficial bacteria), however I also have a bio wheel. TIA, |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Should I remove the carbon from my filter?
If carbon works for you, use it. Most planted tank keepers have found that
carbon doesn't help, and so don't use it. But if you do get some benefit from it, use it. I doubt it absorbs enough nutrients to hurt the plants. Leigh http://www.fortunecity.com/lavender/halloween/881/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Should I remove the carbon from my filter?
My guess is--- and its only a guess--- that the claim of promoting bacterial
growth and nitrification is true only in that as a filter medium, these products provide surface area on which nitrifying bacteria can grow. This is true of ceramic beads though-- there is nothing too magic about lots of surface area. It might be interesting to write the companies involved to ask for an explanation of how these products work. Seachem is IMO a really good company, and if you write them, they are quite willing to discuss the science behind their offerings. As for the other claims you cite, I take them at face value. Note for example though, that trace amounts of copper (which you specifically mentioned) are needed for good plant growth. Other trace nutrients/metals such as Zinc, Molybdenum, Boron, etc, are generally present in very small quantities in tank water. Nevertheless, they are important to plants. Sounds like these filter mediums potentially remove at least some of these nutrients, which is not necessarily desirable. Having said this, if it works for you, possibly there are bigger things to worry about. Maybe some of the other frequent and knowledgeable contributors to this newsgroup will offer their opinions/analysis. I myself would like to find a solution to the surface scum problem. If these mediums help you eliminate surface scum, that is a big plus. Maybe be on the look out for plant nutrient deficiency if you decide you cannot live without the carbon and/or other chemical/metal absorbing mediums in your filter. Thanks for the information on these products. -Bruce Geist "SlimFlem" wrote in message .net... Chemi-Pure is an Ion filter medium made by Boyd Enterprises that is supposed to promote aerobic bacterial growth and nitrification as well as remove dissolved organics. It is also supposed to remove copper, metal, ions, odors, all pollution, gases, CO2, etc. The removal of CO2 makes me wonder, but that's why I was hoping someone would throw their 2 cents in if it really does indeed remove CO2 in a way harmful to plants. PuriGen by SeaChem is about the same thing. The guys at the LFS said either can be run, as well as carbon, in a planted tank. I hear so many different opinons about this, it's hard to know what to believe. I use carbon here and there for a few days at a time and all surface scum is removed and doesn't build back up for a couple of weeks. "Bruce Geist" wrote in message ... I am using an Eheim surface extractor with limited success. The surface extractor I am using tends to clog with leaves and other plant parts. I have added a couple of powerheads to produce small amounts of surface agitation to help keep surface scum at bay. Other than that, I change 40 to 50 percent of my tank water once per week. I still get some film on my water by the end of the week, but its not too bad. Protein skimmers do not work well in freshwater. This is second hand knowledge; I have not tried it myself. Apparently in fresh water, bubbles are not fine enough to make the thing work. As for the other products you mention, I am not familiar with them. What is in them? -Bruce Geist "SlimFlem" wrote in message news:ZJOQ9.593213$NH2.39586@sccrnsc01... If the general consensus is not to use carbon in the planted tank, what is the best way to remove disolved organics and/or protein "scum"/film from the surface? Would something like PuriGen or Chemi-Pure be acceptable? I had begun to develop a white film on the surface of my tank. I ran carbon for 4 days and the film was completely removed. Would protein skimmers be worth it in planted tanks? What about surface extractor add-ons for canisters such as Eheim? Thanks, Jesse "Bruce Geist" wrote in message ... Take it out for a planted tank. I doesn't really help you, and it may (especially when its fresh) take significant trace elements out of the water. You are better off with out it. Replace it with some other high surface area filter substrate-- like ceramic beeds or the like. -Bruce Geist "cindy" wrote in message om... Still getting my first planted tank squared away...its looking quite nice. Should I be removing the activated carbon from my filters? I use a Penquin 170 that has carbon inside the filter material. Does the carbon remove the trace elements and ferts I am adding to the tank? Also, I have been changing the filter monthly as recommended by the LFS but I have read on other forums never to change the filter (because it houses the beneficial bacteria), however I also have a bio wheel. TIA, |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Should I remove the carbon from my filter?
Thanks kush. I think I understand your suggestion-- the PVC acts as a
channel for surface water to get sucked up into? Is this PVC acting as a DIY surface extractor? Neat. Is it pretty convenient to use? -Bruce "kush" wrote in message ... Surface cleaning tip: I keep a length of PVC in the cabinet under my tank which is capped on one end and is just long enough that, when I slip it over the intake tube to my filter, the open end is about 1/4" below the surface of the water. kush "You can't have everything - where would you put it?" (either in the cabinet under the tank or, according to my spouse, on the basement stairs) Bruce Geist wrote in message ... I am using an Eheim surface extractor with limited success. The surface extractor I am using tends to clog with leaves and other plant parts. I have added a couple of powerheads to produce small amounts of surface agitation to help keep surface scum at bay. Other than that, I change 40 to 50 percent of my tank water once per week. I still get some film on my water by the end of the week, but its not too bad. Protein skimmers do not work well in freshwater. This is second hand knowledge; I have not tried it myself. Apparently in fresh water, bubbles are not fine enough to make the thing work. As for the other products you mention, I am not familiar with them. What is in them? -Bruce Geist "SlimFlem" wrote in message news:ZJOQ9.593213$NH2.39586@sccrnsc01... If the general consensus is not to use carbon in the planted tank, what is the best way to remove disolved organics and/or protein "scum"/film from the surface? Would something like PuriGen or Chemi-Pure be acceptable? I had begun to develop a white film on the surface of my tank. I ran carbon for 4 days and the film was completely removed. Would protein skimmers be worth it in planted tanks? What about surface extractor add-ons for canisters such as Eheim? Thanks, Jesse "Bruce Geist" wrote in message ... Take it out for a planted tank. I doesn't really help you, and it may (especially when its fresh) take significant trace elements out of the water. You are better off with out it. Replace it with some other high surface area filter substrate-- like ceramic beeds or the like. -Bruce Geist "cindy" wrote in message om... Still getting my first planted tank squared away...its looking quite nice. Should I be removing the activated carbon from my filters? I use a Penquin 170 that has carbon inside the filter material. Does the carbon remove the trace elements and ferts I am adding to the tank? Also, I have been changing the filter monthly as recommended by the LFS but I have read on other forums never to change the filter (because it houses the beneficial bacteria), however I also have a bio wheel. TIA, |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Should I remove the carbon from my filter?
I don't use the Chemi-Pure or PuriGen, I was just quoting from the
containers. What I was after was some experiece from others that may have used these in planted tanks in the past or some other filter medium used to remove disolved organics. I only use carbon for a few days at a time when the scum develops and then remove it. It does the job. I like kush's use of the PVC pipe as a DIY surface extractor, however, I still don't see how this helps to remove the scum/disolved organics unless there is some sort of filter medium to remove it once this PVC sucks it into the filter. It seems like this would just mix it around in the water until it again formed on the surface. Kush, what sorts of filter mediums are you using? Do you have any surface scum problems? Thanks, Jesse "Bruce Geist" wrote in message ... My guess is--- and its only a guess--- that the claim of promoting bacterial growth and nitrification is true only in that as a filter medium, these products provide surface area on which nitrifying bacteria can grow. This is true of ceramic beads though-- there is nothing too magic about lots of surface area. It might be interesting to write the companies involved to ask for an explanation of how these products work. Seachem is IMO a really good company, and if you write them, they are quite willing to discuss the science behind their offerings. As for the other claims you cite, I take them at face value. Note for example though, that trace amounts of copper (which you specifically mentioned) are needed for good plant growth. Other trace nutrients/metals such as Zinc, Molybdenum, Boron, etc, are generally present in very small quantities in tank water. Nevertheless, they are important to plants. Sounds like these filter mediums potentially remove at least some of these nutrients, which is not necessarily desirable. Having said this, if it works for you, possibly there are bigger things to worry about. Maybe some of the other frequent and knowledgeable contributors to this newsgroup will offer their opinions/analysis. I myself would like to find a solution to the surface scum problem. If these mediums help you eliminate surface scum, that is a big plus. Maybe be on the look out for plant nutrient deficiency if you decide you cannot live without the carbon and/or other chemical/metal absorbing mediums in your filter. Thanks for the information on these products. -Bruce Geist "SlimFlem" wrote in message .net... Chemi-Pure is an Ion filter medium made by Boyd Enterprises that is supposed to promote aerobic bacterial growth and nitrification as well as remove dissolved organics. It is also supposed to remove copper, metal, ions, odors, all pollution, gases, CO2, etc. The removal of CO2 makes me wonder, but that's why I was hoping someone would throw their 2 cents in if it really does indeed remove CO2 in a way harmful to plants. PuriGen by SeaChem is about the same thing. The guys at the LFS said either can be run, as well as carbon, in a planted tank. I hear so many different opinons about this, it's hard to know what to believe. I use carbon here and there for a few days at a time and all surface scum is removed and doesn't build back up for a couple of weeks. "Bruce Geist" wrote in message ... I am using an Eheim surface extractor with limited success. The surface extractor I am using tends to clog with leaves and other plant parts. I have added a couple of powerheads to produce small amounts of surface agitation to help keep surface scum at bay. Other than that, I change 40 to 50 percent of my tank water once per week. I still get some film on my water by the end of the week, but its not too bad. Protein skimmers do not work well in freshwater. This is second hand knowledge; I have not tried it myself. Apparently in fresh water, bubbles are not fine enough to make the thing work. As for the other products you mention, I am not familiar with them. What is in them? -Bruce Geist "SlimFlem" wrote in message news:ZJOQ9.593213$NH2.39586@sccrnsc01... If the general consensus is not to use carbon in the planted tank, what is the best way to remove disolved organics and/or protein "scum"/film from the surface? Would something like PuriGen or Chemi-Pure be acceptable? I had begun to develop a white film on the surface of my tank. I ran carbon for 4 days and the film was completely removed. Would protein skimmers be worth it in planted tanks? What about surface extractor add-ons for canisters such as Eheim? Thanks, Jesse "Bruce Geist" wrote in message ... Take it out for a planted tank. I doesn't really help you, and it may (especially when its fresh) take significant trace elements out of the water. You are better off with out it. Replace it with some other high surface area filter substrate-- like ceramic beeds or the like. -Bruce Geist "cindy" wrote in message om... Still getting my first planted tank squared away...its looking quite nice. Should I be removing the activated carbon from my filters? I use a Penquin 170 that has carbon inside the filter material. Does the carbon remove the trace elements and ferts I am adding to the tank? Also, I have been changing the filter monthly as recommended by the LFS but I have read on other forums never to change the filter (because it houses the beneficial bacteria), however I also have a bio wheel. TIA, |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Should I remove the carbon from my filter?
Xref: 127.0.0.1 rec.aquaria.freshwater.plants:67662
SlimFlem wrote ... ... I still don't see how this helps to remove the scum/disolved organics unless there is some sort of filter medium to remove it once this PVC sucks it into the filter... what sorts of filter mediums are you using? I have an oversized AquaVia with a slow flow rate and jam-packed with filter floss, sponge media, ceramic bio rings, and (gasp!) activated carbon as well as anything else that may strike my fancy at the LFS. Whatever eventually comes out the other end is pure enough to sterilize contact lenses in (well, someone else's contact lenses, maybe). "Bruce Geist" wrote... ...the PVC acts as a channel for surface water to get sucked up into? Is this PVC acting as a DIY surface extractor? Correct. Is it pretty convenient to use? It used to be, before I drilled a hole in my intake strainer to insert a CO2 line. I would just sort of twist the intake tube off to the side and slip the pipe over it, then twist the whole thing back into place... elapsed time, five seconds. Now I would have to disconnect the CO2 first but, truthfully, I haven't needed to use it for a while. I suppose I could drill a passthrough hole for the CO2 line in the PVC, too. The two times I used it, it only took a couple of days to clear up the problem. I think if I had it to do over again I wouldn't worry about capping the pipe; I'd just bury the open end in the gravel. kush "You can't have everything - where would you put it?" |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Activated carbon in filter - will this remove the liquid iron fert I add to the tank? | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
Carbon filter / CO2 | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
Alternative filter for dynoflo-2 -without carbon pad | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
Carbon in filter: Really absorbs liquid fertilizers?? | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
carbon filter media + planted tanks | Freshwater Aquaria Plants |