Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old 22-02-2004, 03:38 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why good plant growth= bad algae growth

I think there are several reasons for low algae presence at moderate
non
limiting nutrients with macrophytes.

Perhaps it is nutrient limitation but what type?
NH4 seems to cause blooms but NO3 does not to nearly the same degree.
So teasing apart which form of nitrogen might be the key.

PR(Photorespiration) may cause some of algae basal cells to release on
plant leaves(but my
own study with CO2/O2 levels were inconclusive, algae did well on all
gas
conditions, high O2, high CO2/O2, high CO2 only and the control). Both
algae and plants respond well to high O2 and both prefer CO2 over
HCO3.
Water changes always seem to help. Removes many epiphytic algae and
any
that are floating around(see Zimba and Hopson, roughly 80% of the
epiphytes
were removed by swirling in water in a flask for 90sec).
We scrub, prune old leaves that get infected. Some folks fluff the
plants to get any detrital matter that settles, often algae.

We add herbivores.

Some suggest allelopathy, but all 300 species of plants elicit the
same
response? What is the likelyhood that all 300 species have the same
strong
chemical and effect? Extremely small.

It has to be something more general and I see this occur in non CO2
planted
tanks as well and in nature.

I've suggested that algae know "when someone else is home." and don't
bloom. When the plant growth is sour, the NH4 uptake declines,
bacteria
don't have enough time to respond, algae gets a free meal of NH4 even
if a
slight increase, this means a lot more relatively to a small algae
than a
larger plant.
O2 levels decline as since the plant production rate is declining
also.
Bacteria may also rob algae of any trace amounts of NH4 due to the
higher O2 levels from healthy growing plants.

This is the best idea thus far:

Algae spores may not have any signal like = NH4 presence telling them
to
grow(plants remove all the NH4 when they are healthy, bacterial
removal also occurs rapidly when the O2 levels are higher).
So very low/absent NH4 may tell algae that someone else is there.

This idea would make sense in general terms and also explain why good
plants growth = poor algae growth even if there are nutrients
available
for vegetative growth.
I've observed that many algae just stop growing when placed into a
tank
that has good plant growth and also with tanks that had poor plant
growth,
got some algae, and then stopped growing after the plant health
improved.

Another two stage pathway:
High O2 levels may activate bacteria in the substrate that suppress
algal
spores that are generally present in the substrate much like a seed
bank/reservior. This may co-occur with the plant's uptake of NH4 and
these two may be linked.
I did not test for this as I used no substrate in the original test
with
high O2/CO2 etc.

The nutrient levels are great for plants, they out pace and out grow
algae
when feed a stable diet, algae are better able to deal with dramatic
changes while it takes much more time for plants to get established.
You
can see this in shallow lake ecology where macrophytes are removed or
as
they fill in. It takes years for them to redominate again. It does not
take
long for the algae to take over.

Shallow lakes are very prone to wind resuspension of nutrients from
the
sediments. This allows a bloom of algae since it suspends NH4(and
other
nutrients)
Macrophytes reduce wave action and prevent resuspension and this leads
to
gin clear water. There is some arguement with this theory but it seems
correct to me from what I've read about resuspension.

We do this when we replant and rework the tank, doing a water change
right
takes care of this.

This issue has not been explore much in the literature, mainly
phytoplankton vs macrophytes and not a lot there, the pickings are
slim for
periphyton/epiphytes vs macrophytes in the context that is useful for
planted aquarist.

It has to be something general.
I think it has a lot to do with algae's signaling to bloom or stay put
till
things get ripe again like with NH4.

Everything I've done with NH4 tells me it's the problem in natural
ecosystems and in planted tanks, SW or FW.
Many bothersome algae bloom readily with NH4 additions.
But they don't if you add NO3+the other nutrients.
You can try this by adding more and more fish to a thriving healthy
tank.
Once you pass by the rate of NH4 uptake by those plants, you provide a
ripe
place for algae to grow. You can add everything else and not get a
response.

Plants and algae occupy different ecological habitats also. A small
amount
of NH4 means a lot to the algae vs the plant.

So that's the seed theory/notion idea that algae know when or when not
to
grow based on NH4 and why healthy plant growth = poor algae when
there are
enough nutrients for either group.

This seems like the best expaination so far. Now I need to test
this:-)
It's a combination of things but I think this is why the new algae
does not
grow. This is particularly noticable in many tanks and with any method
folks use.
This also applied to lakes and non CO2 planted tanks.

Non CO2 planted tanks also have this same pattern, they have low
inputs of
NH4 from fish food only and if there's enough plant biomass, there's
generally sufficent NH4 uptake. These tanks also have less light and
slower
growth of both the plants but importantly also the Algae.
CO2 is preferred by algae as well, but a fair number of plants will
use the
HCO3 and most all algae do or can. Some algae just need very little
CO2 in
their environment to do well.

So the algae grow slower in non CO2 planted tanks, they have plenty of
plants to remove the NH4, then growth rates are slow so the nutrients
demands can be met from fish waste and substrate uptake, cycling
resulting
in extremely low algae presence.

Since you do not resuspend the tank weekly with water changes, the
tank
does well/better without water changes. If you added CO2, that's fine
since
the higher growth rates in those tanks removes all the NH4
resuspended/leeched out at a faster rate than the non CO2 planted
tank.

Then if you apply this to a CO2 enriched low light tank, then you get
extremely low algae presence as well.If you keep adding more and more
fish to a planted tank, you will get algae and it's not due to NO3,
PO4, K+, it's due to NH4.

This theory seems applicable to all planted tank methods also. Even
some
lakes and streams.

Regards,
Tom Barr

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why good plant growth= bad algae growth [email protected] Freshwater Aquaria Plants 3 22-02-2004 10:53 PM
Why good plant growth= bad algae growth [email protected] Freshwater Aquaria Plants 0 22-02-2004 03:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017