#1   Report Post  
Old 16-05-2005, 06:06 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default q about effective lightning

Hi,

I am still on my quest to add more lightning to my 36" tank.

I am torn between a 96W single light or a 2X55W bulbs solution.

What is the effective watt for the 2X55W considering that they are I
believe 21" PC?
Obviously it is not 110W although I will be paying for that rate.

Is the 96W a better option, although it costs more to buy and the bulbs
probably cost more to replace, even if they last for a year or two?

Plant wise, will it make a huge difference the 96W versus 55WX2 combo?

I would imagine the 2X55 would still provide enough light for healthy
growth while not promoting algae growth too much compared to the 96W!
Is this a correct observation?

Would it impact the plant cycle if instead of having the 2X55w on for
12 hours to only 11? It would be a way to reduce hydro costs.

Let's read your opinions.
Thanks

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Daring the lightning louis Ohland Gardening 1 01-10-2003 05:12 AM
red bud struck by lightning Connie & Alan North Carolina 5 11-08-2003 06:11 AM
Despite lightning, fires 'quiet' in Glacier Aozotorp alt.forestry 0 10-08-2003 10:03 AM
Lightning Strike BargainTraveller Ponds 26 05-08-2003 04:20 AM
Lightning Strike OT? WTH brought this on? Just Me \Koi\ Ponds 4 31-07-2003 12:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017