Aug 26 - Nasturtium_6040.jpg
 

JD
Canon 10D
EXIF Data Included
e-mail: blissful-wind(at)usa.net

Additional images at;
http://www.flickr.com/photos/john-pa/

Aug 26 - Nasturtium_6040.jpg
 

and chop the leaves up & add to your salad........... Delicious! Nice Pic.


John - Pa. wrote in message
...
JD
Canon 10D
EXIF Data Included
e-mail: blissful-wind(at)usa.net

Additional images at;
http://www.flickr.com/photos/john-pa/

Aug 26 - Nasturtium_6040.jpg
 

WOW! Amazing photo!

-Mariana

John - Pa. wrote in message
...
JD
Canon 10D
EXIF Data Included
e-mail: blissful-wind(at)usa.net

Additional images at;
http://www.flickr.com/photos/john-pa/

Aug 26 - Nasturtium_6040.jpg
 

Thanks... although I have to 'fess-up that this is manipulated a bit.

I have a chronic problem taking images of bright, highly-saturated
reds. In this case the original image was a RAW. During conversion I
could get either a nicely detailed flower with the background badly
underexposed, or a decently exposed background with the reds blown out
and loosing all detail.

In this case I took those two different conversions of the same image
and then masked them together. I think the result is a little surreal,
but I kind of like it anyway.

JD



On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:05:22 GMT, "Jane Doe"
wrote:

WOW! Amazing photo!

-Mariana

John - Pa. wrote in message
.. .
JD
Canon 10D
EXIF Data Included
e-mail: blissful-wind(at)usa.net

Additional images at;
http://www.flickr.com/photos/john-pa/

Aug 26 - Nasturtium_6040.jpg
 

John - Pa. wrote in message
...
Thanks... although I have to 'fess-up that this is manipulated a bit.


So what? Does that break some kind of a binaries law?
The photo is beautiful, done well, pleasing to the eye, doesn't bother me
none that it's manipulated.
Thank you for posting it.

Mariana

Aug 26 - Nasturtium_6040.jpg
 

John - Pa. wrote in message
...
JD
Canon 10D
EXIF Data Included
e-mail: blissful-wind(at)usa.net

Additional images at;
http://www.flickr.com/photos/john-pa/

I loved that, thanks!

Mary