GardenBanter.co.uk

GardenBanter.co.uk (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/)
-   Garden Photos (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/garden-photos/)
-   -   Poppies in Light and Shadow - 20083973-Edit.jpg (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/garden-photos/176211-poppies-light-shadow-20083973-edit-jpg.html)

John - Pa. 22-06-2008 11:48 PM

Poppies in Light and Shadow - 20083973-Edit.jpg
 
1 Attachment(s)
This may not look like much, but I am actually quite pleased with it
photographically.

Obviously, half the flower bed is in shadow, and the other half is
still in full sun. The cool thing (IMO) is the level of detail in both
areas.

I took several shots of this at different settings (all spot metered
on the central flower), and this one came out OK in the bright, and
very dark in the shadow. The RAW converter I use is Lightroom. The
first thing I did was to reduce contrast as far as I could. Then there
is an option called "Recovery" that just darkens the very brightest
highlights. There is another option called "Fill Light" that just
brightens the very darkest portions. By using both, I think I have
achieved a result that is similar to what my eye saw at the time
without looking too unnatural. A High Dynamic Range process can do
something similar, but it is a lot harder to deal with.

JD
Canon 1D-mkIII
EXIF Data Included
e-mail: blissful-wind(at)usa.net

Additional images at;
http://www.flickr.com/photos/john-pa/



wendy7 23-06-2008 03:32 AM

Poppies in Light and Shadow - 20083973-Edit.jpg
 
Wonderful photograph John, your undying patience has paid off.
Cheers Wendy

"John - Pa." wrote in message
...
This may not look like much, but I am actually quite pleased with it
photographically.

Obviously, half the flower bed is in shadow, and the other half is
still in full sun. The cool thing (IMO) is the level of detail in both
areas.

I took several shots of this at different settings (all spot metered
on the central flower), and this one came out OK in the bright, and
very dark in the shadow. The RAW converter I use is Lightroom. The
first thing I did was to reduce contrast as far as I could. Then there
is an option called "Recovery" that just darkens the very brightest
highlights. There is another option called "Fill Light" that just
brightens the very darkest portions. By using both, I think I have
achieved a result that is similar to what my eye saw at the time
without looking too unnatural. A High Dynamic Range process can do
something similar, but it is a lot harder to deal with.

JD
Canon 1D-mkIII
EXIF Data Included
e-mail: blissful-wind(at)usa.net

Additional images at;
http://www.flickr.com/photos/john-pa/




Michael[_11_] 23-06-2008 09:09 PM

Poppies in Light and Shadow - 20083973-Edit.jpg
 
John - Pa. wrote:

first thing I did was to reduce contrast as far as I could. Then there
is an option called "Recovery" that just darkens the very brightest
highlights. There is another option called "Fill Light" that just
brightens the very darkest portions. By using both, I think I have
achieved a result that is similar to what my eye saw at the time
without looking too unnatural.


Remarkably well done! This *is* the sort of view I'd expect from eyeballs
alone, and it's impossible to capture directly with a camera.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter