GardenBanter.co.uk

GardenBanter.co.uk (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/)
-   Garden Photos (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/garden-photos/)
-   -   Gazebo (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/garden-photos/178430-gazebo.html)

Paddy's Pig[_3_] 06-09-2008 07:44 PM

Gazebo
 
1 Attachment(s)





Mary Fisher 06-09-2008 08:14 PM

Gazebo
 

"Paddy's Pig" wrote in message
...


That is lovely.

I wish I had a garden big enough for it :-)

Mary



Marilyn[_2_] 07-09-2008 05:31 AM

Gazebo
 
very pretty---Did you build this?

"Mary Fisher" wrote in message
t...

"Paddy's Pig" wrote in message
...


That is lovely.

I wish I had a garden big enough for it :-)

Mary



Paddy's Pig[_3_] 07-09-2008 05:53 AM

Gazebo
 
"Marilyn" wrote in message
. ..
very pretty---Did you build this?



No. That's not even my yard.

That's at an arboretum on the campus of Cal State Fullerton.
--
Pat Durkin



Marilyn[_2_] 13-09-2008 03:02 AM

Gazebo
 
Oh. It is so great to travel the world, isn't it?....right here from the
couch. :)
"Paddy's Pig" wrote in message
...
"Marilyn" wrote in message
. ..
very pretty---Did you build this?



No. That's not even my yard.

That's at an arboretum on the campus of Cal State Fullerton.
--
Pat Durkin



Graybeard 16-09-2008 11:27 PM

Gazebo
 
2 Attachment(s)
Hi
Second attempt. Tried before and sent it to Pat instead of the group. Also
forgot to reduce the size to 72ppi.
Graybeard

Beautiful Gazebo. I built one in our back yard a few years ago. It's not
as elegant as your picture, but I am not a carpenter and it is the only one
that I ever built.
Hope you enjoy the attached pictures.

Graybeard
PS: It is in Florida


"Paddy's Pig" wrote in message
...










Wolf Kirchmeir[_3_] 17-09-2008 12:35 AM

Gazebo
 
Graybeard wrote:
Hi
Second attempt. Tried before and sent it to Pat instead of the group. Also
forgot to reduce the size to 72ppi.
Graybeard



Good looking gazebo - not the usual octagon.

Erm, I know this is nitpicking, but changing the pixels per inch (ppi)
doesn't change the size of the picture. It may change the way some
applications print the picture. Most applications nowadays actually
change the ppi (and other parameters) to suit the physical size you've
specified (4"x6", for example.)

The display software does something similar when it's set to "size to
fit window".

If you want to size a picture to display at or nearly full-size when
displayed in other people's NG software, change the picture's dimensions
in pixels to something in the range between 1600x1220 and 1024 x768

HTH

--
Wolf Kirchmeir

Graybeard 17-09-2008 03:12 PM

Gazebo
 
You are absolutely right. However, I also resized the images to 8x10". The
lower resolution was selected to enable faster movement, since monitor
resolution is about 72 ppi, and my images are usually several megapixels in
size and that resolution is not required for a monitor, but is required for
quality printing.
Graybeard

"Wolf Kirchmeir" wrote in message
...
Graybeard wrote:
Hi
Second attempt. Tried before and sent it to Pat instead of the group.
Also forgot to reduce the size to 72ppi.
Graybeard



Good looking gazebo - not the usual octagon.

Erm, I know this is nitpicking, but changing the pixels per inch (ppi)
doesn't change the size of the picture. It may change the way some
applications print the picture. Most applications nowadays actually change
the ppi (and other parameters) to suit the physical size you've specified
(4"x6", for example.)

The display software does something similar when it's set to "size to fit
window".

If you want to size a picture to display at or nearly full-size when
displayed in other people's NG software, change the picture's dimensions
in pixels to something in the range between 1600x1220 and 1024 x768

HTH

--
Wolf Kirchmeir




Joan F \(MI\)[_71_] 17-09-2008 06:18 PM

Gazebo
 
For electronic display you should measure in pixels, not inches.

Graybeard wrote:
| You are absolutely right. However, I also resized the images to
| 8x10". The lower resolution was selected to enable faster movement,
| since monitor resolution is about 72 ppi, and my images are usually
| several megapixels in size and that resolution is not required for a
| monitor, but is required for quality printing.
| Graybeard
|



Graybeard 17-09-2008 10:10 PM

Gazebo
 
The Photoshop elements Resize function provides both. As an old
photographer who has spent thousands of hours in a darkroom, I think in
terms of photo print sizes. However, as an electronic engineer, either is
OK with me.
Graybeard

"Joan F (MI)" wrote in message
...
For electronic display you should measure in pixels, not inches.

Graybeard wrote:
| You are absolutely right. However, I also resized the images to
| 8x10". The lower resolution was selected to enable faster movement,
| since monitor resolution is about 72 ppi, and my images are usually
| several megapixels in size and that resolution is not required for a
| monitor, but is required for quality printing.
| Graybeard
|






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter