#1   Report Post  
Old 24-07-2013, 12:49 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.gardens
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jul 2013
Posts: 5
Default Stargazer

Sorry I goofed. here is the 2nd pic.
Jim
Attached Thumbnails
Stargazer-stargazer-lily-002.jpg  
  #2   Report Post  
Old 24-07-2013, 01:45 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.gardens
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,688
Default Stargazer

What size is it? It is taking a long time to download.
  #3   Report Post  
Old 24-07-2013, 06:43 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.gardens
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 415
Default Stargazer

In article , joevan
writes
What size is it? It is taking a long time to download.


1024x768 which is the same size I most often post. There's a lot of
detail in it but it's 866kB which is a large file for the picture size.
All jpegs are compressed but this one's less compressed than most.

The EXIF data says it was post-processed by PhotoScape, a "fun and easy"
free editor. Since data storage and bandwidth are cheap nowadays,
compression probably isn't the developer's top priority.

Talking of detail, I love the butterfly at the top of the frame!
--
Sue ]
  #4   Report Post  
Old 24-07-2013, 08:15 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.gardens
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,688
Default Stargazer

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:43:36 +0100, Mad Cow
wrote:

In article , joevan
writes
What size is it? It is taking a long time to download.


1024x768 which is the same size I most often post. There's a lot of
detail in it but it's 866kB which is a large file for the picture size.
All jpegs are compressed but this one's less compressed than most.

The EXIF data says it was post-processed by PhotoScape, a "fun and easy"
free editor. Since data storage and bandwidth are cheap nowadays,
compression probably isn't the developer's top priority.

Talking of detail, I love the butterfly at the top of the frame!

Thanks, it hesitatated so long I though it might be huge. I am using
DSL from lousy Verizon and it is a PITA.
  #5   Report Post  
Old 24-07-2013, 08:18 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.gardens
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,688
Default Stargazer

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:43:36 +0100, Mad Cow
wrote:

Talking of detail, I love the butterfly at the top of the frame!
--

I like the whole thing. The butterfly too.





  #6   Report Post  
Old 26-07-2013, 12:33 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.gardens
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jul 2013
Posts: 5
Default Stargazer

Thank you for the comment. First try at posting ( I'm Old ), I'll get my 50
yr. old son to give me a lesson.
Jim in Surrey

"joevan" wrote in message
...

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:43:36 +0100, Mad Cow
wrote:

Talking of detail, I love the butterfly at the top of the frame!
--

I like the whole thing. The butterfly too.



  #7   Report Post  
Old 26-07-2013, 12:37 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.gardens
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jul 2013
Posts: 5
Default Stargazer



"Mad Cow" wrote in message ...

In article , joevan
writes
What size is it? It is taking a long time to download.


1024x768 which is the same size I most often post. There's a lot of
detail in it but it's 866kB which is a large file for the picture size.
All jpegs are compressed but this one's less compressed than most.

The EXIF data says it was post-processed by PhotoScape, a "fun and easy"
free editor. Since data storage and bandwidth are cheap nowadays,
compression probably isn't the developer's top priority.

Talking of detail, I love the butterfly at the top of the frame!
--
Sue ]

Thanks for your comments Sue. First try at posting and I'm Old, I'll get my
son to give me a lesson.

Jim in Surrey

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stargazer Lily Myrl Jeffcoat Gardening 4 02-06-2006 05:36 PM
stargazer lilies KD Gardening 4 02-06-2005 12:49 AM
Care of Stargazer after it bloomed???? Vox Humana Gardening 17 11-08-2004 07:59 AM
Care of Stargazer after it bloomed???? TOM KAN PA Gardening 0 28-07-2004 07:11 PM
Stargazer Lily question, please e.t. and dct Plant Biology 1 10-09-2003 07:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017