|
Apple Tree From Seed
Kay Lancaster wrote: On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:38:12 -0600, sherwindu wrote: Why put all this effort into an apple tree that will produce lousy tasting apples. I mean, isn't growing You're sure about that? cv Delicious was a chance seedling (and they're very nice apples when they haven't been subjected to storage!) Likewise, most of the heirloom apples are chance seedlings, and I'll take a Cox's Orange Pippin or an Arkansas Black over a Fuji any day. Naturally, only the successful chance seedlings were passed down through the years. The thousands, or perhaps millions of them that were just awful are not around anymore. Statistically, the successful chance seedling is a rarity. I personally would not put a lot of time and care into an apple tree with those kinds of odds. Kids enjoy having their own plants... or at least I sure did. Kay's Pear, while it never produced world-class commercial fruits, produced acceptable home fruit, and it was *mine*. There are a few things I have grown that I'm glad no one knows about. Exactly how did you grow this Kay pear? Was it a sport of some well known pear, a seedling of some known pear, or a complete chance seedling? And I've gotten some very good no-name apples out of local roadsides, probably planted by birds. Or, they came from a known variety tree that lost it's identity somewhere along it's lifetime. Speaking of modern genetically produced apples, have you tasted some of the newer ones like Cameo, Honeycrisp, Rubinette, etc., etc. If you look in the Fruit, Nut, and Berry Inventory book of available varieties, you will find the chance seedlings there, but only a small percentage of the total offerings. I say, leave it up to the experts to do the experimenting, when there are so many good apples of known parentage out there. Encouraging a kid to put his energies into a losing venture is not a good introduction to gardening. Sherwin D. Sometimes, especially when you're a kid, it's nice to go against the flow of uniformity and find out what happens in an uncontrolled experiment. Kay |
Apple Tree From Seed
Carl 1 Lucky Texan wrote: Kay Lancaster wrote: On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:38:12 -0600, sherwindu wrote: Why put all this effort into an apple tree that will produce lousy tasting apples. I mean, isn't growing You're sure about that? cv Delicious was a chance seedling (and they're very nice apples when they haven't been subjected to storage!) Likewise, most of the heirloom apples are chance seedlings, and I'll take a Cox's Orange Pippin or an Arkansas Black over a Fuji any day. Kids enjoy having their own plants... or at least I sure did. Kay's Pear, while it never produced world-class commercial fruits, produced acceptable home fruit, and it was *mine*. And I've gotten some very good no-name apples out of local roadsides, probably planted by birds. Sometimes, especially when you're a kid, it's nice to go against the flow of uniformity and find out what happens in an uncontrolled experiment. Kay Couldn't you just surreptitiously swap the seeds for known, 'quality' cultivar seeds? You missed the point. The resultant apple will have the genetic makeup of some recessed genes, and will not resemble the original apple, no matter what. You can't faithfully reproduce apple trees from seed, and in most cases, not even come close. Leave it at that. Sherwin D. Carl -- to reply, change ( .not) to ( .net) |
Apple Tree From Seed
"Farm1" please@askifyouwannaknow wrote in message ... "sherwindu" wrote in message Kay Lancaster wrote: On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:38:12 -0600, sherwindu wrote: Why put all this effort into an apple tree that will produce lousy tasting apples. You're sure about that? cv Delicious was a chance seedling (and they're Naturally, only the successful chance seedlings were passed down through the years. I think that many chance seedlings produce fruit that is not only edible but quite good. Each year we visit a lot of chance seedling trees and eat and harvest the fruit. If we can beat the birds to them, most are good to very good and those that aren't are fine for cooking. These trees grow along a very quiet country road and we are sure have grown from apple cores thrown from passing cars. There must be at least 100 of these trees and we watch and check with interest each year. |
Apple Tree From Seed
"Farm1" please@askifyouwannaknow wrote in message ... "sherwindu" wrote in message Kay Lancaster wrote: On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:38:12 -0600, sherwindu wrote: Why put all this effort into an apple tree that will produce lousy tasting apples. You're sure about that? cv Delicious was a chance seedling (and they're Naturally, only the successful chance seedlings were passed down through the years. I think that many chance seedlings produce fruit that is not only edible but quite good. Each year we visit a lot of chance seedling trees and eat and harvest the fruit. If we can beat the birds to them, most are good to very good and those that aren't are fine for cooking. These trees grow along a very quiet country road and we are sure have grown from apple cores thrown from passing cars. There must be at least 100 of these trees and we watch and check with interest each year. Are you saying that natural selection through the history of the apple has led to a fruit that is desired by birds/animals, and a more desirable apple for the propagation vector to eat spreads the seed better than apples that are bitter and tasteless? Who woulda thunk... |
Apple Tree From Seed
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 01:07:55 -0600, sherwindu wrote:
You missed the point. The resultant apple will have the genetic makeup of some recessed genes, and will not resemble the original apple, no matter what. You Please, please... pick up a good basic genetics book and do some reading. "Recessed genes"? You think they're on holiday break? Better yet, a good basic plant breeding text sounds like it needs to be on your list. There are some really interesting issues in apple genetics, including ploidy levels, polygenic inheritance and a tendency to "bud sport". In fact, it's fairly common to find an oddball branch on a grafted tree, clearly tissue grown from the graft, but with different fruit characters from most of the rest of the tree. Chimerism and mosaicism have played an important part in the development of a lot of tree fruit cultivars. Genetic diversity isn't something to be scorned... Kay |
Apple Tree From Seed
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 01:04:03 -0600, sherwindu wrote:
Naturally, only the successful chance seedlings were passed down through the years. The thousands, or perhaps millions of them that were just awful are not around anymore. So are the thousands of older cultivars that didn't withstand shipping or long storage, or weren't "pretty enough" in someone's eyes, or just didn't get recognized by a commercial nursery. And they were good apples, some much better than the half dozen or so cultivars you get in most US grocery stores today. Exactly how did you grow this Kay pear? Was it a sport of some well known pear, a seedling of some known pear, or a complete chance seedling? A cross between an ornamental pear of unknown parentage and the Bosc in my grandparents' backyard. Grandpa helped me make it (I was all of 4 or 5 at the time), and then we grew out the seeds. And it wasn't a bad pear at all. Finally succumbed to fireblight many years later. And I've gotten some very good no-name apples out of local roadsides, probably planted by birds. Or, they came from a known variety tree that lost it's identity somewhere along it's lifetime. Doubt that... old roads, old fencelines, and most of them don't look anything like currently favored cultivars. Speaking of modern genetically produced apples, have you tasted some of the newer ones like Cameo, Honeycrisp, Rubinette, etc., etc. Sure. Have you tasted some of the "wild" apples being currently imported for germplasm use? Some really good stuff there. If you look in the Fruit, Nut, and Berry Inventory book of available varieties, you will find the chance seedlings there, but only a small percentage of the total offerings. Yes, because people who actually bother to name cultivars are likely to be working with a subset of plants that have something they're trying to improve upon. But chance seedlings play a part, too.... go back in the parentage and you'll find a lot of "unnamed seedling x cox's orange pippin" sorts of entries. I say, leave it up to the experts to do the experimenting, when there are so many good apples of known parentage out there. Encouraging a kid to put his energies into a losing venture is not a good introduction to gardening. And I'd argue, as an old educator, that learning that everything doesn't work the way you think it might is a much more important lesson (in gardening, in life, in science) than success at growing a "kit tree". Doesn't take that much effort to grow a seedling tree to bearing size, if they can make it through the winter in a planter (a relatively hostile environment.) Back to the OP's question... insulate that planter, cuddle it up against the house, and make sure it doesn't dry out or have standing water in it this winter. Then enjoy what you get with your kids. Me? I'm a retired botanist. My grandfather, who originally got me interested in gardening, used to take me on day trips for such things as hunting for the stump of the first 'Delicious' apple tree, or over to look at the crab apple test orchard a friend ran. Learning to look and examine and ask questions and perservere are good life lessons you can learn from a little amateur plant breeding, imo. Kay |
Apple Tree From Seed
Couldn't you just surreptitiously swap the seeds for known, 'quality'
cultivar seeds? Doesn't quite work that way -- apples have some interesting genetic instabilities that make even grafting known cultivars less than a sure bet. And seed of any open pollinated, sexually reproduced seed (as opposed to apomictically produced seeds, as dandelions often do) is going to produce offspring different from their parents. (Just like human kids, while they resemble their parents, aren't exact duplicates. And one sibling is not identical to another.) It's only with some fairly intensive breeding techniques (e.g. linebreeding, back-crosses) that we've been able to produce the uniform fields of plants currently in favor with mechanized agriculture. John Chapman certainly wasn't toting around bags of grafted apple trees when he decided to spread apple seeds around on his journeys. Some of the seedlings that came up produced very nice apples. Some didn't. It's the same result I'd expect of the OP's little experiment... they may get some nicely flavored apples from the seedlings, and then again, they might get spitters. But whatever they get, it'll be interesting for the kids if the parents help them interpret what they're seeing and experiencing. someone earlier claimed that the OP would get "crab apples" from the seedlings... this is pretty unlikely, as most of the eating apples are diploids, and most of the crabapples are polyploid (have several sets of chromosomes, rather than simple pairs.) At any rate, I think kids (and grownups, too, from the sounds of things here!) should try things like growing seeds of an open-pollinated, sexually reproducing crop, just to see some of the hidden genetic variation uncovered... it's really pretty amazing. I also wish I could get more people involved in such activities as comparison tastings of fruits -- or as my husband said after I got him to try about 50 cultivars of apple in a day, "Gee, I wish I'd known before now that there were more apples than Delicious and Jonathan." (He has now found he also likes tomatoes, pears, sweet corn and I'm working on getting him off iceberg lettuce. g) Save some seed of something or other... tomatoes, dwarf marigolds, impatiens, lettuce... grow 'em out and see what you get. It's fun. Kay |
Apple Tree From Seed
Not to be irreverent or irrelevant, but
If John Chapman could read this thread he would turn over in his grave. He considered grafting to be "absolute wickedness" according to some accounts. BTW his grave is located in Fort Wayne IN somewhere near his memorial which is located in the park and is accessible from the rear of the parking lot of the Ft. Wayne Memorial Coliseum. It is on a mound surrounded by an iron fence. The stele at the gravesite reads, "In fond memory of John Chapman, endearingly known as "Johnny Appleseed These grave-site improvements were provided by The Men's Garden Clubs of America and The Johnny Appleseed National Memorial Foundation, Inc. September 25, 1965" There is some dispute as to the actual burial site but most historians believe it is at least within 50 feet of the corrrect location based on accounts recorded from eyewitnesses at his burial in the old Archer Cemetery in March 1845. A few people in Ohio and Indiana believe they still have a Johnny Appleseed Tree on their property and tourists can buy Johnny AppleSeed Tree. But the last known surviving Johnny Appleseed tree is located on a farm near Nova, Ohio, some 50 miles west of Akron. The fruit is said to resemble the Albemarle Pippen and they will sell you cuttings. Olin |
Apple Tree From Seed
hob wrote: "Farm1" please@askifyouwannaknow wrote in message ... "sherwindu" wrote in message Kay Lancaster wrote: On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:38:12 -0600, sherwindu wrote: Why put all this effort into an apple tree that will produce lousy tasting apples. You're sure about that? cv Delicious was a chance seedling (and they're Naturally, only the successful chance seedlings were passed down through the years. I think that many chance seedlings produce fruit that is not only edible but quite good. Each year we visit a lot of chance seedling trees and eat and harvest the fruit. If we can beat the birds to them, most are good to very good Good is a relative term. How do they compare with a known heritage or well engineered apple like a Honeycrisp? and those that aren't are fine for cooking. These trees grow along a very quiet country road and we are sure have grown from apple cores thrown from passing cars. There must be at least 100 of these trees and we watch and check with interest each year. Are you saying that natural selection through the history of the apple has led to a fruit that is desired by birds/animals, and a more desirable apple for the propagation vector to eat spreads the seed better than apples that are bitter and tasteless? There are a lot of vegetables and fruit that pigs eat but I wouldn't find them tasty. You can't compare a bird's taste buds to a human. Sometimes, they will eat an apple just to get the moisture out of it. Johnny Appleseed spread a lot of seeds in his lifetime, but most of them produced apples that were not very tasty, and were used instead for cider or mash to feed the animals. In those days, for most pioneers it was a question of survival, not enhancing their palette. Sherwin D. Who woulda thunk... |
Apple Tree From Seed
Kay Lancaster wrote: On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 01:07:55 -0600, sherwindu wrote: You missed the point. The resultant apple will have the genetic makeup of some recessed genes, and will not resemble the original apple, no matter what. You Please, please... pick up a good basic genetics book and do some reading. "Recessed genes"? You think they're on holiday break? I think you are the one that needs the textbooks. Read on ... Better yet, a good basic plant breeding text sounds like it needs to be on your list. I am not pretending to be a biologist or a plant geneticist. However, I do know a solid layman's idea of how apple trees propagate. The term recessive gene is not my invention but is part of the laws of Mendelian inheritance created by Gregor Mendel. If you have a problem with that, take it up with him. There are some really interesting issues in apple genetics, including ploidy levels, polygenic inheritance and a tendency to "bud sport". In fact, it's fairly common It's so common that I have never seen one in my 20 years of growing apples, visiting numerous orchards, or just talking to fellow apple growers. to find an oddball branch on a grafted tree, What you call oddball I have only observed in very small variations in size, color, and taste of the apple. I am not familiar with any radically different apples appearing suddenly on just one branch. clearly tissue grown from the graft, but with different fruit characters from most of the rest of the tree. Chimerism and mosaicism U. of Minnesota describes mosaicism as: 'Mosaic variegated aneuploidy (MVA) is a rare recessive condition'. Evidently they think that it's ok to use the term recessive. have played an important part in the development of a lot of tree fruit cultivars. Genetic diversity isn't something to be scorned... We are not talking here about genetic engineering! This is simply about the natural genetic effects of planting an apple seed. This kid planting an apple seed is not going to take it to his laboratory to do high tech genetic engineering! Sherwin D. Kay |
Apple Tree From Seed
Kay Lancaster wrote: On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 01:04:03 -0600, sherwindu wrote: Naturally, only the successful chance seedlings were passed down through the years. The thousands, or perhaps millions of them that were just awful are not around anymore. So are the thousands of older cultivars that didn't withstand shipping or long storage, or weren't "pretty enough" in someone's eyes, or just didn't get recognized by a commercial nursery. And they were good apples, some much better than the half dozen or so cultivars you get in most US grocery stores today. First of all, I grow a goodly number of these heritage apples, so you obviously missed my point. Exactly how did you grow this Kay pear? Was it a sport of some well known pear, a seedling of some known pear, or a complete chance seedling? A cross between an ornamental pear of unknown parentage and the Bosc in my grandparents' backyard. Grandpa helped me make it (I was all of 4 or 5 at the time), and then we grew out the seeds. And it wasn't a bad pear at all. Finally succumbed to fireblight many years later. And I've gotten some very good no-name apples out of local roadsides, probably planted by birds. Or, they came from a known variety tree that lost it's identity somewhere along it's lifetime. Doubt that... old roads, old fencelines, and most of them don't look anything like currently favored cultivars. Speaking of modern genetically produced apples, have you tasted some of the newer ones like Cameo, Honeycrisp, Rubinette, etc., etc. Sure. Have you tasted some of the "wild" apples being currently imported for germplasm use? Some really good stuff there. Not sure which ones you are suggesting. Where can I find out more about them? If you look in the Fruit, Nut, and Berry Inventory book of available varieties, you will find the chance seedlings there, but only a small percentage of the total offerings. Yes, because people who actually bother to name cultivars are likely to be working with a subset of plants that have something they're trying to improve upon. But chance seedlings play a part, too.... go back in the parentage and you'll find a lot of "unnamed seedling x cox's orange pippin" sorts of entries. No arguement there. However, I just want to point out that the number of successes of chance seedlings is not that great. The Cox's Orange Pippen (which I grew until it died last year) has been bred into many other varieties, of which I still have it as part of my Freyberg apple. I say, leave it up to the experts to do the experimenting, when there are so many good apples of known parentage out there. Encouraging a kid to put his energies into a losing venture is not a good introduction to gardening. And I'd argue, as an old educator, that learning that everything doesn't work the way you think it might is a much more important lesson (in gardening, in life, in science) than success at growing a "kit tree". OK. What is more rewarding? Sticking a seed into the ground, or grafting a tree? I think the seed planting sounds more like a 'kit'. Doesn't take that much effort to grow a seedling tree to bearing size, if they can make it through the winter in a planter (a relatively hostile environment.) That's the point. What attachment can you have to something that can be grown with about the same effort as a carrot. Back to the OP's question... insulate that planter, cuddle it up against the house, and make sure it doesn't dry out or have standing water in it this winter. In the real cold climates, I would bury the pot for added protection. Sherwin D. Then enjoy what you get with your kids. Me? I'm a retired botanist. My grandfather, who originally got me interested in gardening, used to take me on day trips for such things as hunting for the stump of the first 'Delicious' apple tree, or over to look at the crab apple test orchard a friend ran. Learning to look and examine and ask questions and perservere are good life lessons you can learn from a little amateur plant breeding, imo. Kay |
Apple Tree From Seed
John Chapman certainly wasn't toting around bags of grafted apple trees when he decided to spread apple seeds around on his journeys. Some of the seedlings that came up produced very nice apples. I would change that to very few. Since there was no scientific tracking of his trees, we can only surmise the results. Some didn't. It's the same result I'd expect of the OP's little experiment... they may get some nicely flavored apples from the seedlings, Doubt it very much. and then again, they might get spitters. But whatever they get, it'll be interesting for the kids if the parents help them interpret what they're seeing and experiencing. I would not put a kid into a statistically losing project when there are much better related things, like grafting. At any rate, I think kids (and grownups, too, from the sounds of things here!) should try things like growing seeds of an open-pollinated, sexually reproducing crop, just to see some of the hidden genetic variation uncovered... it's really pretty amazing. Problem here is that this will be a standard tree, which will take the kid at least 7 years to taste their first apple. Save some seed of something or other... tomatoes, dwarf marigolds, impatiens, lettuce... grow 'em out and see what you get. It's fun. For those plants, I agree. Sherwin D. Kay . |
Apple Tree From Seed
Olin wrote: Not to be irreverent or irrelevant, but If John Chapman could read this thread he would turn over in his grave. He considered grafting to be "absolute wickedness" according to some accounts. As I mentioned in another posting, John Chapman's contribution was to provide a source of fruit to remote farmers and settlers, who would otherwise not have any access to apples. These apples were ok for making cider or feeding the animals. The cider was necessary to provide a nutritious drink in the Winter months, when there was no substitute. Chapman was certainly an eccentric, possibly driven by religious fervor, but as I have explained, he did contribute to the promoting of fruit growing in this country. If you worry about John Chapman turning in his grave, give a few thoughts to Sir Issac Newton, who's theories were a great contribution, but were found to be not applicable to all facets of our universe. By the way, in doing some surfing about Chapman, I came across this interesting site about growing apples from seeds: http://www.pollinator.com/appleseeds_faq.htm Sherwin D. |
Apple Tree From Seed
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 01:29:30 -0600, sherwindu wrote:
Kay Lancaster wrote: On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 01:07:55 -0600, sherwindu wrote: You missed the point. The resultant apple will have the genetic makeup of some recessed genes, and will not resemble the original apple, no matter what. You Please, please... pick up a good basic genetics book and do some reading. "Recessed genes"? You think they're on holiday break? I think you are the one that needs the textbooks. Read on ... Better yet, a good basic plant breeding text sounds like it needs to be on your list. I am not pretending to be a biologist or a plant geneticist. However, I do know a solid layman's idea of how apple trees propagate. The term recessive gene is not my invention but is part of the laws of Mendelian inheritance created by Gregor Mendel. If you have a problem with that, take it up with him. I have no problem with the notion of recessive genes, but you wrote "recessed genes" and also seemed to have no real grasp of some of the other issues of apple genetics. Furthermore, recessive genes probably aren't at the heart of variation in apples. There are some really interesting issues in apple genetics, including ploidy levels, polygenic inheritance and a tendency to "bud sport". In fact, it's fairly common It's so common that I have never seen one in my 20 years of growing apples, visiting numerous orchards, or just talking to fellow apple growers. to find an oddball branch on a grafted tree, What you call oddball I have only observed in very small variations in size, color, and taste of the apple. I am not familiar with any radically different apples appearing suddenly on just one branch. It's pretty common. If it weren't so late in the season here, I could probably find several branch sports on apples within a mile or so of my house. clearly tissue grown from the graft, but with different fruit characters from most of the rest of the tree. Chimerism and mosaicism U. of Minnesota describes mosaicism as: 'Mosaic variegated aneuploidy (MVA) is a rare recessive condition'. Mosaic variegated aneupoloidy is different from mosaicism. An organism exhibiting mosaicism has patches of cells with a different genome than other patches of cells. Mosaic Variegated Aneuplody Syndrome is a rare genetic disorder of humans, causing mitotic non-disjunction of cells, leading to groups of aneuploid cells (cells with the wrong numbers of chromosomes.) If this is the page you looked at: http://www.cancer.umn.edu/research/p...c/c3dec04.html it ain't about apples. We are not talking here about genetic engineering! This is simply about the natural genetic effects of planting an apple seed. This kid planting an apple seed is not going to take it to his laboratory to do high tech genetic engineering! Who said he or she was? Find another strawman. I'm done. Kay |
Apple Tree From Seed
Kay Lancaster wrote: On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 01:29:30 -0600, sherwindu wrote: Kay Lancaster wrote: On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 01:07:55 -0600, sherwindu wrote: You missed the point. The resultant apple will have the genetic makeup of some recessed genes, and will not resemble the original apple, no matter what. You Please, please... pick up a good basic genetics book and do some reading. "Recessed genes"? You think they're on holiday break? I think you are the one that needs the textbooks. Read on ... Better yet, a good basic plant breeding text sounds like it needs to be on your list. I am not pretending to be a biologist or a plant geneticist. However, I do know a solid layman's idea of how apple trees propagate. The term recessive gene is not my invention but is part of the laws of Mendelian inheritance created by Gregor Mendel. If you have a problem with that, take it up with him. I have no problem with the notion of recessive genes, but you wrote "recessed genes" and also seemed to have no real grasp of some of the other issues of apple genetics. Here we go with the old semantics attack. If you can't win an argument on substance, attack someone on their use of language. You can hypothesize all you want about my abilities, but I question yours, as well. I don't need to have to have a degree in biology to know that there are certain traits carried over in various generations of apples, as well as other living matter. Exactly what other issues of apple genetics are you referring to? Your theories about how easily apples can mutate into something desirable is way removed from reality. I suggest you stick with your plums, where you may have some stronger arguments. I think that in this case, one can learn more about apple growing by experiencing it first hand, rather than burying oneself in a lot of textbooks, especially those on genetics. However, I do read books, surf the net, and review articles to keep up with the latest information on apple growing. I am not a research scientist or a genetic engineer trying to develop new varieties of apples. Furthermore, recessive genes probably aren't at the heart of variation in apples. They certainly are when you try to reproduce an apple by planting it's seed. There are some really interesting issues in apple genetics, including ploidy levels, polygenic inheritance and a tendency to "bud sport". In fact, it's fairly common It's so common that I have never seen one in my 20 years of growing apples, visiting numerous orchards, or just talking to fellow apple growers. to find an oddball branch on a grafted tree, What you call oddball I have only observed in very small variations in size, color, and taste of the apple. I am not familiar with any radically different apples appearing suddenly on just one branch. It's pretty common. If it weren't so late in the season here, I could probably find several branch sports on apples within a mile or so of my house. I don't believe you. clearly tissue grown from the graft, but with different fruit characters from most of the rest of the tree. Chimerism and mosaicism U. of Minnesota describes mosaicism as: 'Mosaic variegated aneuploidy (MVA) is a rare recessive condition'. Mosaic variegated aneupoloidy is different from mosaicism. An organism exhibiting mosaicism has patches of cells with a different genome than other patches of cells. Mosaic Variegated Aneuplody Syndrome is a rare genetic disorder of humans, causing mitotic non-disjunction of cells, leading to groups of aneuploid cells (cells with the wrong numbers of chromosomes.) If this is the page you looked at: http://www.cancer.umn.edu/research/p...c/c3dec04.html it ain't about apples. No, I didn't look at that page. We are not talking here about genetic engineering! This is simply about the natural genetic effects of planting an apple seed. This kid planting an apple seed is not going to take it to his laboratory to do high tech genetic engineering! Who said he or she was? You are the one that went off on a tangent of genetic engineering, not me. I simply stated that you cannot expect an apple planted from seed to have the basic characteristics of the parent apple it came from. Do you still want to dispute that! In talking with a fellow apple grower today, he told me that he had heard from several sources that the odds of getting a decent apple from a planted seed was about 1 in 10,000. Now if you are talking Prunus ( peaches, plums, apricots ), this is not the case, as those plants are better genetically capable of passing on their traits through their seeds. Find another strawman. I'm done. I certainly hope so. I'm getting tired of trying to put certain ideas people have about growing apples into the proper perspective. If you are an academic or genetic expert, you shouldn't push your credentials in people's faces, especially when you mislead them about the real world. Sherwin D. Kay |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:34 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter