GardenBanter.co.uk

GardenBanter.co.uk (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/)
-   Gardening (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/gardening/)
-   -   Well, Microsoft has sure been busy (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/gardening/194140-re-well-microsoft-has-sure-been-busy.html)

Hitman Hero 19-10-2010 11:16 PM

Well, Microsoft has sure been busy
 
Snit wrote:
Hitman Hero stated in post on 10/19/10
1:44 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Oct 19, 2:30 pm, Tim Murray wrote:
Microsoft nukes Zeus malware from 275,000 Windows machines

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/m...-malware-from-...
windows-machines/7481

I thought Wintel machines don't get these problems anymore? Isn't
that what some of the Winfaitful in here keep saying?

From the article:
"Microsoft is claiming major success at cleaning the notorious Zeus
crimeware trojan from infected Windows machines.

One week after adding detections into its malicious software removal
tool, Microsoft said it nuked Zeus (also called Zbot) 281,491 times
from 274,873 computers."

Is this one difficult to fight (there are more infections than
systems)? I guess I'll stick with the 'success-less' Mac;)


LOL!


Why, Steve, are you now laughing at all of your own posts... and
spamming multiple news groups?


LOL!



Connersmom 20-10-2010 12:47 AM

Well, Microsoft has sure been busy
 
No one has to actually respond to this post. I am just doing some
homework for my
class in GO Internet and one of the assignements was to reply to an
article we were
locating. Hi Everyone!!!

On Oct 19, 6:16*pm, "Hitman Hero" wrote:
Snit wrote:
Hitman Hero stated in post on 10/19/10
1:44 PM:


Steve Carroll wrote:
On Oct 19, 2:30 pm, Tim Murray wrote:
Microsoft nukes Zeus malware from 275,000 Windows machines


http://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/m...-malware-from-....
windows-machines/7481


I thought Wintel machines don't get these problems anymore? Isn't
that what some of the Winfaitful *in here keep saying?


From the article:
"Microsoft is claiming major success at cleaning the notorious Zeus
crimeware trojan from infected Windows machines.


One week after adding detections into its malicious software removal
tool, Microsoft said it nuked Zeus (also called Zbot) 281,491 times
from 274,873 computers."


Is this one difficult to fight (there are more infections than
systems)? I guess I'll stick with the 'success-less' Mac;)


LOL!


Why, Steve, are you now laughing at all of your own posts... and
spamming multiple news groups?


LOL!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



Connersmom 20-10-2010 12:51 AM

Well, Microsoft has sure been busy
 
Hi Everyone! I am just on here doing an assignment for school and
wanted to post
a comment on someones page. THanks.

On Oct 19, 6:16*pm, "Hitman Hero" wrote:
Snit wrote:
Hitman Hero stated in post on 10/19/10
1:44 PM:


Steve Carroll wrote:
On Oct 19, 2:30 pm, Tim Murray wrote:
Microsoft nukes Zeus malware from 275,000 Windows machines


http://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/m...-malware-from-....
windows-machines/7481


I thought Wintel machines don't get these problems anymore? Isn't
that what some of the Winfaitful *in here keep saying?


From the article:
"Microsoft is claiming major success at cleaning the notorious Zeus
crimeware trojan from infected Windows machines.


One week after adding detections into its malicious software removal
tool, Microsoft said it nuked Zeus (also called Zbot) 281,491 times
from 274,873 computers."


Is this one difficult to fight (there are more infections than
systems)? I guess I'll stick with the 'success-less' Mac;)


LOL!


Why, Steve, are you now laughing at all of your own posts... and
spamming multiple news groups?


LOL!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



JeffM 20-10-2010 05:59 AM

N00b fails assignment (was: Microsoft has sure been busy)
 
Connersmom wrote:
I am just on here doing an assignment for school
and wanted to post a comment on someones page.

You failed the assignment.

1) This isn't "someones page"; it's a USENET group.
http://google.com/search?q=define:USENET
(Actually, you posted through
Google's crappy Web-based inter face to USENET.)

2) ...and it isn't *one* USENET group;
you replied to a post that was cross-posted to FIVE unrelated groups.
i.e. the original post was a dim-witted troll.

Next time, look on the To: line before you click Post.
Even better: Clicking on Google's *More options* link
will show you the same thing earlier.

3) You top-posted.
That's extremely bad form in ANY type of communications.
http://google.com/search?q=cache:RXr79UPHu9MJ:groups.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en%26answer=46492+Tempting-though-it-is-*-*-*-*-*-*+Usenet+STOP+bin+bin+Summarize.what.you're.follow ing.up+go.to.the.BOTTOM+*-*-*-*-relevant-*+remove-*-*-*-irrelevant+before-the-original-*-*

4) You posted twice.
Refresh the page after a minute or so and see if your post went thru.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter