Steve Carroll wrote:
Recently, a person on this newsgroup, who claims to be a Mac user,
wrote the following statements on the same issue (making aliases in
OSX) :

"It is true, though, that the bug he has found exists with both List
view and Column view. "

... and

"Yup, you found a bug Steve."


Aftfer these "bug" type statements this Mac user then wrote these
kinds of statements on this issue:

"And Steve wants people to now believe that this does not work the
same on ?his machine... when the problem is *undoubtedly* user error.
Undoubtedly."

... and


"The problem is user error. But Steve likes to make up stories about
the problems he has with his Macs... he does not
accept the fact he is just an incompetent user. "


In the past, this Mac user has also written the following statement
about how he believes he differs from "many in csma""

"Unlike many in csma, I do not focus my views on personalities".



If this person isn't merely focusing on a personality here, isn't this
person being an Apple apologist for claiming something he himself has
labeled as a "bug" in OSX is "*undoubtedly*" an example of "user
error" by an "incompetent user"?

The "person" you refer to is an idiot who is consumed with his hatred for
you. Even though he admits it is a bug from Apple he blames you. He think
you and Steve Jobs are the same person. I guess last names are too
confusing for him.

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
10/29/10 5:42 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
Recently, a person on this newsgroup, who claims to be a Mac user,
wrote the following statements on the same issue (making aliases in
OSX) :

"It is true, though, that the bug he has found exists with both List
view and Column view. "

... and

"Yup, you found a bug Steve."


Aftfer these "bug" type statements this Mac user then wrote these
kinds of statements on this issue:

"And Steve wants people to now believe that this does not work the
same on ?his machine... when the problem is *undoubtedly* user error.
Undoubtedly."

... and


"The problem is user error. But Steve likes to make up stories about
the problems he has with his Macs... he does not
accept the fact he is just an incompetent user. "


In the past, this Mac user has also written the following statement
about how he believes he differs from "many in csma""

"Unlike many in csma, I do not focus my views on personalities".



If this person isn't merely focusing on a personality here, isn't this
person being an Apple apologist for claiming something he himself has
labeled as a "bug" in OSX is "*undoubtedly*" an example of "user
error" by an "incompetent user"?

The "person" you refer to is an idiot who is consumed with his hatred for
you. Even though he admits it is a bug from Apple he blames you. He think
you and Steve Jobs are the same person. I guess last names are too
confusing for him.

Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. So he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
particular way. While this way works with icon view, other
ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and white
he is, again, lost. And he will not, of course, admit what is obvious: he
was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple aliases to be made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. I not only proved
to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how to do it - down to
showing him how and when to use what keyboard keys. The fact I helped Steve
was, to him, offensive, so he - as he does so often - trolled me and created
another army of socks to "help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his socks),
Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts. He cannot
understand how it cannot be black and white - how someone can read *some*
posts without reading all. Another sign of Steve's extreme black and white
world view.

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

On Oct 29, 8:58*pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
10/29/10 5:42 PM:





Steve Carroll wrote:
Recently, a person on this newsgroup, who claims to be a Mac user,
wrote the following statements on the same issue (making aliases in
OSX) :

"It is true, though, that the bug he has found exists with both List
view and Column view. "

... and

"Yup, you found a bug Steve."

Aftfer these "bug" *type statements this Mac user then wrote these
kinds of statements on this issue:

"And Steve wants people to now believe that this does not work the
same on ?his machine... when the problem is *undoubtedly* user error.
Undoubtedly."

... and

"The problem is user error. But Steve likes to make up stories about
the problems he has with his Macs... he does not
accept the fact he is just an incompetent user. "

In the past, this Mac user has also written the following statement
about how he believes he differs from "many in csma""

"Unlike many in csma, I do not focus my views on personalities".

If this person isn't merely focusing on a personality here, isn't this
person being an Apple apologist for claiming something he himself has
labeled as a "bug" in OSX is *"*undoubtedly*" an example of "user
error" by an "incompetent user"?

The "person" you refer to is an idiot who is consumed with his hatred for
you. *Even though he admits it is a bug from Apple he blames you. *He think
you and Steve Jobs are the same person. *I guess last names are too
confusing for him.

Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. *So he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
* multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
* aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
* it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
* aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
* http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
* quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
* particular way. *While this way works with icon view, other
* ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
* This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and white
he is, again, lost. *And he will not, of course, admit what is obvious: he
was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple aliases to be made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. *I not only proved
to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how to do it - down to
showing him how and when to use what keyboard keys. *The fact I helped Steve
was, to him, offensive, so he - as he does so often - trolled me and created
another army of socks to "help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his socks),
Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts. *He cannot
understand how it cannot be black and white - how someone can read *some*
posts without reading all. *Another sign of Steve's extreme black and white
world view.

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Jesus H Christ. You two faggots will still be arguing when you're 100.
GET A ****ING LIFE. You two are the most lifeless ****s on the WWW.

MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:18 PM:

....
Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. *So he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
* multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
* aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
* it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
* aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
* http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
* quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
* particular way. *While this way works with icon view, other
* ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
* This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and white
he is, again, lost. *And he will not, of course, admit what is obvious: he
was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple aliases to be made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. *I not only proved
to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how to do it - down to
showing him how and when to use what keyboard keys. *The fact I helped Steve
was, to him, offensive, so he - as he does so often - trolled me and created
another army of socks to "help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his socks),
Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts. *He cannot
understand how it cannot be black and white - how someone can read *some*
posts without reading all. *Another sign of Steve's extreme black and white
world view.

Jesus H Christ. You two faggots will still be arguing when you're 100.
GET A ****ING LIFE. You two are the most lifeless ****s on the WWW.

Hey, I jumped in to *help* Steve. Even though he is consumed with hatred, I
go out of my way to help him. But it offends Steve that I know things he
does not. Poor kid.

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

On Oct 29, 9:21*pm, Snit wrote:
MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:18 PM:

...





Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. *So he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
* multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
* aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
* it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
* aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
* http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
* quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
* particular way. *While this way works with icon view, other
* ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
* This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and white
he is, again, lost. *And he will not, of course, admit what is obvious: he
was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple aliases to be made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. *I not only proved
to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how to do it - down to
showing him how and when to use what keyboard keys. *The fact I helped Steve
was, to him, offensive, so he - as he does so often - trolled me and created
another army of socks to "help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his socks),
Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts. *He cannot
understand how it cannot be black and white - how someone can read *some*
posts without reading all. *Another sign of Steve's extreme black and white
world view.

Jesus H Christ. You two faggots will still be arguing when you're 100.
GET A ****ING LIFE. You two are the most lifeless ****s on the WWW.

Hey, I jumped in to *help* Steve. *Even though he is consumed with hatred, I
go out of my way to help him. *But it offends Steve that I know things he
does not. *Poor kid.

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Everyone hates you. You're an annoying ****. Kill yourself and any of
your offspring.

MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:25 PM:

On Oct 29, 9:21*pm, Snit wrote:
MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:18 PM:

...





Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. *So he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
* multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
* aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
* it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
* aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
* http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
* quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
* particular way. *While this way works with icon view, other
* ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
* This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and white
he is, again, lost. *And he will not, of course, admit what is obvious: he
was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple aliases to be made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. *I not only
proved
to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how to do it - down to
showing him how and when to use what keyboard keys. *The fact I helped
Steve
was, to him, offensive, so he - as he does so often - trolled me and
created
another army of socks to "help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his socks),
Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts. *He cannot
understand how it cannot be black and white - how someone can read *some*
posts without reading all. *Another sign of Steve's extreme black and white
world view.

Jesus H Christ. You two faggots will still be arguing when you're 100.
GET A ****ING LIFE. You two are the most lifeless ****s on the WWW.

Hey, I jumped in to *help* Steve. *Even though he is consumed with hatred, I
go out of my way to help him. *But it offends Steve that I know things he
does not. *Poor kid.

Everyone hates you. You're an annoying ****. Kill yourself and any of
your offspring.

See how you whine about Carroll and I arguing... when the reality is you do
much of what he does. I just wish the two of you could grow up a little and
find some way to become honest and honorable. Not gonna happen though, is
it?


--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

"Snit" wrote in message
.. .
MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:25 PM:

On Oct 29, 9:21 pm, Snit wrote:
MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:18 PM:

...





Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. So
he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
particular way. While this way works with icon view, other
ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and
white
he is, again, lost. And he will not, of course, admit what is
obvious: he
was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple aliases to be made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. I not only
proved
to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how to do it -
down to
showing him how and when to use what keyboard keys. The fact I helped
Steve
was, to him, offensive, so he - as he does so often - trolled me and
created
another army of socks to "help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his
socks),
Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts. He
cannot
understand how it cannot be black and white - how someone can read
*some*
posts without reading all. Another sign of Steve's extreme black and
white
world view.

Jesus H Christ. You two faggots will still be arguing when you're 100.
GET A ****ING LIFE. You two are the most lifeless ****s on the WWW.

Hey, I jumped in to *help* Steve. Even though he is consumed with
hatred, I
go out of my way to help him. But it offends Steve that I know things
he
does not. Poor kid.

Everyone hates you. You're an annoying ****. Kill yourself and any of
your offspring.

See how you whine about Carroll and I arguing... when the reality is you
do
much of what he does. I just wish the two of you could grow up a little
and
find some way to become honest and honorable. Not gonna happen though, is
it?


--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


Snit begs for my attention

"Snit" wrote in message
.. .
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
10/29/10 5:42 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
Recently, a person on this newsgroup, who claims to be a Mac user,
wrote the following statements on the same issue (making aliases in
OSX) :

"It is true, though, that the bug he has found exists with both List
view and Column view. "

... and

"Yup, you found a bug Steve."


Aftfer these "bug" type statements this Mac user then wrote these
kinds of statements on this issue:

"And Steve wants people to now believe that this does not work the
same on ?his machine... when the problem is *undoubtedly* user error.
Undoubtedly."

... and


"The problem is user error. But Steve likes to make up stories about
the problems he has with his Macs... he does not
accept the fact he is just an incompetent user. "


In the past, this Mac user has also written the following statement
about how he believes he differs from "many in csma""

"Unlike many in csma, I do not focus my views on personalities".



If this person isn't merely focusing on a personality here, isn't this
person being an Apple apologist for claiming something he himself has
labeled as a "bug" in OSX is "*undoubtedly*" an example of "user
error" by an "incompetent user"?

The "person" you refer to is an idiot who is consumed with his hatred for
you. Even though he admits it is a bug from Apple he blames you. He
think
you and Steve Jobs are the same person. I guess last names are too
confusing for him.

Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. So he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
particular way. While this way works with icon view, other
ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and
white
he is, again, lost. And he will not, of course, admit what is obvious: he
was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple aliases to be made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. I not only
proved
to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how to do it - down to
showing him how and when to use what keyboard keys. The fact I helped
Steve
was, to him, offensive, so he - as he does so often - trolled me and
created
another army of socks to "help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his socks),
Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts. He cannot
understand how it cannot be black and white - how someone can read *some*
posts without reading all. Another sign of Steve's extreme black and
white
world view.

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]



I am surprise you stopped thinking of incest long enough to beg for my
attention.

On 10/29/10 8:21 PM, Snit wrote:
MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:18 PM:

Jesus H Christ. You two faggots will still be arguing when you're 100.
GET A ****ING LIFE. You two are the most lifeless ****s on the WWW.

Hey, I jumped in to *help* Steve. Even though he is consumed with hatred, I
go out of my way to help him. But it offends Steve that I know things he
does not. Poor kid.


Pratt is begging for your attention by calling you a fag.

Snit wrote:
MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:18 PM:

...
Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view.
So he (and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
particular way. While this way works with icon view, other
ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black
and white he is, again, lost. And he will not, of course, admit
what is obvious: he was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple
aliases to be made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. I not
only proved to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how
to do it - down to showing him how and when to use what keyboard
keys. The fact I helped Steve was, to him, offensive, so he - as he
does so often - trolled me and created another army of socks to
"help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his
socks), Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his
posts. He cannot understand how it cannot be black and white - how
someone can read *some* posts without reading all. Another sign of
Steve's extreme black and white world view.

Jesus H Christ. You two faggots will still be arguing when you're
100. GET A ****ING LIFE. You two are the most lifeless ****s on the
WWW.

Hey, I jumped in to *help* Steve. Even though he is consumed with
hatred, I go out of my way to help him. But it offends Steve that I
know things he does not. Poor kid.

You helped Steve by saying it was a bug and user error because you are an
idiot.

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

On Oct 29, 8:55*pm, Chance Furlong wrote:
On 10/29/10 8:21 PM, Snit wrote:

MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:18 PM:
Jesus H Christ. You two faggots will still be arguing when you're 100.
GET A ****ING LIFE. You two are the most lifeless ****s on the WWW.

Hey, I jumped in to *help* Steve. Even though he is consumed with hatred, I
go out of my way to help him. But it offends Steve that I know things he
does not. *Poor kid.

Pratt is begging for your attention by calling you a fag.

Well... Snit did finally admit that his "wife" is a man:

"Sandman has tracked down my wife's email and started sending him
bizarre accusations"

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....7?dmode=source

Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 10/29/10 5:42 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
Recently, a person on this newsgroup, who claims to be a Mac user,
wrote the following statements on the same issue (making aliases in
OSX) :

"It is true, though, that the bug he has found exists with both List
view and Column view. "

... and

"Yup, you found a bug Steve."


Aftfer these "bug" type statements this Mac user then wrote these
kinds of statements on this issue:

"And Steve wants people to now believe that this does not work the
same on ?his machine... when the problem is *undoubtedly* user
error. Undoubtedly."

... and


"The problem is user error. But Steve likes to make up stories about
the problems he has with his Macs... he does not
accept the fact he is just an incompetent user. "


In the past, this Mac user has also written the following statement
about how he believes he differs from "many in csma""

"Unlike many in csma, I do not focus my views on personalities".



If this person isn't merely focusing on a personality here, isn't
this person being an Apple apologist for claiming something he
himself has labeled as a "bug" in OSX is "*undoubtedly*" an
example of "user error" by an "incompetent user"?

The "person" you refer to is an idiot who is consumed with his
hatred for you. Even though he admits it is a bug from Apple he
blames you. He think you and Steve Jobs are the same person. I
guess last names are too confusing for him.

Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. So
he (and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
particular way. While this way works with icon view, other
ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and
white he is, again, lost. And he will not, of course, admit what is
obvious: he was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple aliases to be
made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. I not only
proved to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how to do
it - down to showing him how and when to use what keyboard keys. The
fact I helped Steve was, to him, offensive, so he - as he does so
often - trolled me and created another army of socks to "help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his
socks), Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts.
He cannot understand how it cannot be black and white - how someone
can read *some* posts without reading all. Another sign of Steve's
extreme black and white world view.

Can you add a few thousand words to your essay, Snot?

LOL!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Oct 29, 8:55 pm, Chance Furlong wrote:
On 10/29/10 8:21 PM, Snit wrote:

MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:18 PM:
Jesus H Christ. You two faggots will still be arguing when you're
100. GET A ****ING LIFE. You two are the most lifeless ****s on
the WWW.

Hey, I jumped in to *help* Steve. Even though he is consumed with
hatred, I go out of my way to help him. But it offends Steve that I
know things he does not. Poor kid.

Pratt is begging for your attention by calling you a fag.

Well... Snit did finally admit that his "wife" is a man:

"Sandman has tracked down my wife's email and started sending him
bizarre accusations"

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....7?dmode=source

Snot is a fag.

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

On Oct 29, 6:58*pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
10/29/10 5:42 PM:





Steve Carroll wrote:
Recently, a person on this newsgroup, who claims to be a Mac user,
wrote the following statements on the same issue (making aliases in
OSX) :

"It is true, though, that the bug he has found exists with both List
view and Column view. "

... and

"Yup, you found a bug Steve."

Aftfer these "bug" *type statements this Mac user then wrote these
kinds of statements on this issue:

"And Steve wants people to now believe that this does not work the
same on ?his machine... when the problem is *undoubtedly* user error.
Undoubtedly."

... and

"The problem is user error. But Steve likes to make up stories about
the problems he has with his Macs... he does not
accept the fact he is just an incompetent user. "

In the past, this Mac user has also written the following statement
about how he believes he differs from "many in csma""

"Unlike many in csma, I do not focus my views on personalities".

If this person isn't merely focusing on a personality here, isn't this
person being an Apple apologist for claiming something he himself has
labeled as a "bug" in OSX is *"*undoubtedly*" an example of "user
error" by an "incompetent user"?

The "person" you refer to is an idiot who is consumed with his hatred for
you. *Even though he admits it is a bug from Apple he blames you. *He think
you and Steve Jobs are the same person. *I guess last names are too
confusing for him.


(snip some BS by Snit)


* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
* quite the same

Yup... it's what you called a "bug"... an "inconsistency".

- the keystrokes have to be done in a very
* particular way. *

You recognize this, yet, you're saying the "error" here is mine. LOL!

Hint: This is an Apple "error".

While this way works with icon view, other
* ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
* This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

And, notably, you're *still* calling it a "bug"... an
"inconsistency"... while you simultaneously call it my "user error".

Put the crack pipe down now, Snit

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and white
he is, again, lost. *

Apple did something even you admit is inconsistent... I pointed it
out... and you call me lost. What meds can you possibly be mixing
together that would get you this high? LOL!

Steve showed he was

.... right about the "inconsistency" of OSX, that you're labeling a
"bug"? Yes, I did show that.


Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his socks),
Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts.

It's far more than obvious that you read all of my posts. People just
aren't as stupid as you need them to be.

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Oct 29, 6:58 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 10/29/10 5:42 PM:





Steve Carroll wrote:
Recently, a person on this newsgroup, who claims to be a Mac user,
wrote the following statements on the same issue (making aliases in
OSX) :

"It is true, though, that the bug he has found exists with both
List view and Column view. "

... and

"Yup, you found a bug Steve."

Aftfer these "bug" type statements this Mac user then wrote these
kinds of statements on this issue:

"And Steve wants people to now believe that this does not work the
same on ?his machine... when the problem is *undoubtedly* user
error. Undoubtedly."

... and

"The problem is user error. But Steve likes to make up stories
about the problems he has with his Macs... he does not
accept the fact he is just an incompetent user. "

In the past, this Mac user has also written the following statement
about how he believes he differs from "many in csma""

"Unlike many in csma, I do not focus my views on personalities".

If this person isn't merely focusing on a personality here, isn't
this person being an Apple apologist for claiming something he
himself has labeled as a "bug" in OSX is "*undoubtedly*" an
example of "user error" by an "incompetent user"?

The "person" you refer to is an idiot who is consumed with his
hatred for you. Even though he admits it is a bug from Apple he
blames you. He think you and Steve Jobs are the same person. I
guess last names are too confusing for him.


(snip some BS by Snit)


* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
quite the same

Yup... it's what you called a "bug"... an "inconsistency".

- the keystrokes have to be done in a very
particular way.

You recognize this, yet, you're saying the "error" here is mine. LOL!

Hint: This is an Apple "error".

While this way works with icon view, other
ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

And, notably, you're *still* calling it a "bug"... an
"inconsistency"... while you simultaneously call it my "user error".

Put the crack pipe down now, Snit

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black
and white he is, again, lost.

Apple did something even you admit is inconsistent... I pointed it
out... and you call me lost. What meds can you possibly be mixing
together that would get you this high? LOL!

Steve showed he was

... right about the "inconsistency" of OSX, that you're labeling a
"bug"? Yes, I did show that.


Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his
socks), Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts.

It's far more than obvious that you read all of my posts. People just
aren't as stupid as you need them to be.

It is a bug and it is your fault. You see, in Snot's mind you are Steve and
Steve runs Apple. He cannot figure out there is more than one Steve.

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch