Where are the android killer apps?
 

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 24, 10:16 am, Snit wrote:
Sandman stated in post
on 11/24/10 8:51 AM:





In article
,
Steve Carroll wrote:

which doesn't change the fact that your retarded interpretation
of the statements above is... well, still retarded.. :P

What's with the personal attacks, ed? Come on, you stated that you
"absolutely" disagreed with a two-part statement without any
further information. Elaborate guesswork was required by the
reader of your statement.

If you think aforementioned guesswork was too elaborate, that's
your prerogative, but I fail to see how that would warrant such
attacks and dismissal to the guessers ability to maintain a
conversation.

Be easy now, ed is one of the few good trolls we have left, we
don't want to drive him off ;)

Hmmm... I think this brings up an advocacy ng discussion point.
What is the difference between a 'good' troll and a 'bad' one? We
all obviously have a well rounded idea of what a 'bad' troll does.
We all sorta know what a 'good' troll looks like but, if we had to
define it, what's the criteria for drawing that fine line? IOW,
what are the actions that stand right on the edge? I think this is
trickier to answer than it first appears...

I think you have to separate "good vs. bad" from "effective vs.
ineffective". I.e. some trolls may be effective in sheer number of
replies but be really bad at trolling so that most of those replies
are just people that point out how wrong that troller is in his
initial setup. Trolls like zara, Tom Elam and Muahman fit in this
category. They are really really bad trolls that count replies as
the only metric of success.

I would not say that is you, but it might be Steve. When people do
not reply to his trolling he has been known to post his "crickets
chirping" and other similar BS in a desperate attempt to get
responses.

When one analyzes the "people" I have used the term with a very clear
picture develops.


A good troll may not be very effective in the long run. Daniel
Johnsson is a pretty good troll. He pours out a lot of
misinformation, lies and misconceptions about more technical issues
that may look legit to the casual observer, but turns out to be
pure fantasy 9 times of 10.

This is neither you nor Steve. You actually seem rather technically
competent (though you are loath to admit your weaknesses); Carroll,
while he sometimes heads this way (such as his BS about Mac problems
which were clearly made up) tends to just spew nonsense and nit
picks.

Is this a reason why it's Sandman you've chosen to target with your
"professional" jealousy?


A very good troll is someone that is actually correct from time to
time. And someone who manages to keep up the steam in a thread by
continuously inserting new material, not by flaming it's
participants (mostly) :)

That is more of what you do - you post a lot of good info, but then
lie through your teeth and then lash out at those who point out your
lies. If they do it "too much" then you start making dishonest web
pages about them.

Minus the providing a lot of good info bit you just described what you
did on this ng before he ever did it. That he took your lead should
have been expected by you, after all. you were the one who essentially
asked him to do what he eventually ended up doing. Of course, the
difference between his implementation and yours is that his is focuses
on trolls in general, you targeted specific people with the intention
of antagonizing them. It's ironic and hypocritical of you to whine
about this for these reasons.


To a casual observer you might even seem to *believe* your lies,
given how you often do make valid points on other topics.
Interesting to see how you recognize this and label your own actions
as those of a "very good troll".

I think Edwin is a good troll (his current sock puppet is a bit lame
though) and of course, the mother of all trolls is Snit. Both are
good AND effective trolls.

I respond to trolls (such as you and Steve) - which is not the same
thing as being a troll.

So how do you account for the fact that virtually everyone you've come
into contact with in this ng has labeled you a liar, troll or worse,
yet, few of them, relatively speaking, (relative to you) have labeled
Jonas or I in similar fashion?

But part of your trolling is to obfuscate facts by calling
others what you are... but you sorta blew it this time by noting
your own actions, above.

I ask the same question here I just asked. Of course you can't answer
it here, either.

LOL!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/26/10 5:35 PM:

A good troll may not be very effective in the long run. Daniel
Johnsson is a pretty good troll. He pours out a lot of
misinformation, lies and misconceptions about more technical issues
that may look legit to the casual observer, but turns out to be
pure fantasy 9 times of 10.

This is neither you nor Steve. You actually seem rather technically
competent (though you are loath to admit your weaknesses); Carroll,
while he sometimes heads this way (such as his BS about Mac problems
which were clearly made up) tends to just spew nonsense and nit
picks.

Is this a reason why it's Sandman you've chosen to target with your
"professional" jealousy?

You are projecting. I have never claimed to be jealous of Sandman, you or
anyone in CSMA. Jealousy, however, is clearly one of the things that feeds
your obvious hatred of me. You were jealous when your ex/non-ex started
giving me *unwanted* attention, and you are jealous of my greater tech
understanding and understanding of logic. It is not like you hide this,
Steve.


--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Where are the android killer apps?
 

On Nov 26, 5:58*pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/26/10 5:35 PM:

A good troll may not be very effective in the long run. Daniel
Johnsson is a pretty good troll. He pours out a lot of
misinformation, lies and misconceptions about more technical issues
that may look legit to the casual observer, but turns out to be
pure fantasy 9 times of 10.

This is neither you nor Steve. You actually seem rather technically
competent (though you are loath to admit your weaknesses); Carroll,
while he sometimes heads this way (such as his BS about Mac problems
which were clearly made up) tends to just spew nonsense and nit
picks.

Is this a reason why it's Sandman you've chosen to target with your
"professional" jealousy?

You are projecting.


Said the whining, delusional, lying hypocrite who flooded Sandman's
website and chased him around the ng for years because he's jealous of
Sandman's professional capabilities (that he'll never possess because
he's too busy spending his time trolling people on usenet). Remind me
again why over 100 posters have all labeled you a liar troll or worse.
LOL!

*I have never claimed to be jealous of Sandman

You "never" had to, it was obvious to everyone who ever read more than
7 of your posts.

Additional Hint: The scores (or is it hundreds?) of threads you've
created over the years with his name in the title were sort of a
giveaway.

, you or
anyone in CSMA. *Jealousy, however, is clearly one of the things that feeds
your obvious hatred of me.

Sure... I really want to be a whining, delusional, lying hypocrite to
the level you are but I just can't seem to pull if off, LOL!

(snip Snit's attempt to bring Elizabot back into his life)

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 5:58 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/26/10 5:35 PM:

A good troll may not be very effective in the long run. Daniel
Johnsson is a pretty good troll. He pours out a lot of
misinformation, lies and misconceptions about more technical
issues that may look legit to the casual observer, but turns out
to be pure fantasy 9 times of 10.

This is neither you nor Steve. You actually seem rather
technically competent (though you are loath to admit your
weaknesses); Carroll, while he sometimes heads this way (such as
his BS about Mac problems which were clearly made up) tends to
just spew nonsense and nit picks.

Is this a reason why it's Sandman you've chosen to target with your
"professional" jealousy?

You are projecting.


Said the whining, delusional, lying hypocrite who flooded Sandman's
website and chased him around the ng for years because he's jealous of
Sandman's professional capabilities (that he'll never possess because
he's too busy spending his time trolling people on usenet). Remind me
again why over 100 posters have all labeled you a liar troll or worse.
LOL!

I have never claimed to be jealous of Sandman

You "never" had to, it was obvious to everyone who ever read more than
7 of your posts.

Additional Hint: The scores (or is it hundreds?) of threads you've
created over the years with his name in the title were sort of a
giveaway.

, you or
anyone in CSMA. Jealousy, however, is clearly one of the things that
feeds your obvious hatred of me.

Sure... I really want to be a whining, delusional, lying hypocrite to
the level you are but I just can't seem to pull if off, LOL!

(snip Snit's attempt to bring Elizabot back into his life)

LOL!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/26/10 7:27 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 5:58 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/26/10 5:35 PM:

A good troll may not be very effective in the long run. Daniel
Johnsson is a pretty good troll. He pours out a lot of
misinformation, lies and misconceptions about more technical
issues that may look legit to the casual observer, but turns out
to be pure fantasy 9 times of 10.

This is neither you nor Steve. You actually seem rather
technically competent (though you are loath to admit your
weaknesses); Carroll, while he sometimes heads this way (such as
his BS about Mac problems which were clearly made up) tends to
just spew nonsense and nit picks.

Is this a reason why it's Sandman you've chosen to target with your
"professional" jealousy?

You are projecting.


Said the whining, delusional, lying hypocrite who flooded Sandman's
website and chased him around the ng for years because he's jealous of
Sandman's professional capabilities (that he'll never possess because
he's too busy spending his time trolling people on usenet). Remind me
again why over 100 posters have all labeled you a liar troll or worse.
LOL!

I have never claimed to be jealous of Sandman

You "never" had to, it was obvious to everyone who ever read more than
7 of your posts.

Additional Hint: The scores (or is it hundreds?) of threads you've
created over the years with his name in the title were sort of a
giveaway.

, you or
anyone in CSMA. Jealousy, however, is clearly one of the things that
feeds your obvious hatred of me.

Sure... I really want to be a whining, delusional, lying hypocrite to the
level you are but I just can't seem to pull if off, LOL! You were jealous
when your ex/non-ex started giving me *unwanted* attention, and you are
jealous of my greater tech understanding and understanding of logic. It is
not like you hide this, Steve.

LOL!

Re-read your own comments, Steve. You call me names, accuse of things I
never did, and otherwise prove I am right about you being filled with rage,
hatred and jealousy.

It is not like you hide it.

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Where are the android killer apps?
 

On Nov 26, 7:31*pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/26/10 7:27 PM:





Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 5:58 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/26/10 5:35 PM:

A good troll may not be very effective in the long run. Daniel
Johnsson is a pretty good troll. He pours out a lot of
misinformation, lies and misconceptions about more technical
issues that may look legit to the casual observer, but turns out
to be pure fantasy 9 times of 10.

This is neither you nor Steve. You actually seem rather
technically competent (though you are loath to admit your
weaknesses); Carroll, while he sometimes heads this way (such as
his BS about Mac problems which were clearly made up) tends to
just spew nonsense and nit picks.

Is this a reason why it's Sandman you've chosen to target with your
"professional" jealousy?

You are projecting.

Said the whining, delusional, lying hypocrite who flooded Sandman's
website and chased him around the ng for years because he's jealous of
Sandman's professional capabilities (that he'll never possess because
he's too busy spending his time trolling people on usenet). Remind me
again why over 100 posters have all labeled you a liar troll or worse.
LOL!

I have never claimed to be jealous of Sandman

You "never" had to, it was obvious to everyone who ever read more than
7 of your posts.

Additional Hint: The scores (or is it hundreds?) of threads you've
created over the years with his name in the title were sort of a
giveaway.

, you or
anyone in CSMA. Jealousy, however, is clearly one of the things that
feeds your obvious hatred of me.

Sure... I really want to be a whining, delusional, lying hypocrite to the
level you are but I just can't seem to pull if off, LOL! *You were jealous
when your ex/non-ex started giving me *unwanted* attention, and you are
jealous of my greater tech understanding and understanding of logic. *It is
not like you hide this, Steve.
LOL!

Re-read your own comments, Steve. *You call me names, accuse of things I
never did,

Are you claiming that you never flooded Sandman's site? Or that you
never authored bunches of threads with his name in the title? Are you
saying that Sandman's "evidence" that you flooded his site isn't
"strong" ? Or that the Google archive is in error when it shows you as
the author of those many threads over the years?

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 7:31 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/26/10 7:27 PM:





Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 5:58 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/26/10 5:35 PM:

A good troll may not be very effective in the long run. Daniel
Johnsson is a pretty good troll. He pours out a lot of
misinformation, lies and misconceptions about more technical
issues that may look legit to the casual observer, but turns
out to be pure fantasy 9 times of 10.

This is neither you nor Steve. You actually seem rather
technically competent (though you are loath to admit your
weaknesses); Carroll, while he sometimes heads this way (such
as his BS about Mac problems which were clearly made up) tends
to just spew nonsense and nit picks.

Is this a reason why it's Sandman you've chosen to target with
your "professional" jealousy?

You are projecting.

Said the whining, delusional, lying hypocrite who flooded Sandman's
website and chased him around the ng for years because he's
jealous of Sandman's professional capabilities (that he'll never
possess because he's too busy spending his time trolling people on
usenet). Remind me again why over 100 posters have all labeled you
a liar troll or worse. LOL!

I have never claimed to be jealous of Sandman

You "never" had to, it was obvious to everyone who ever read more
than 7 of your posts.

Additional Hint: The scores (or is it hundreds?) of threads you've
created over the years with his name in the title were sort of a
giveaway.

, you or
anyone in CSMA. Jealousy, however, is clearly one of the things
that feeds your obvious hatred of me.

Sure... I really want to be a whining, delusional, lying hypocrite
to the level you are but I just can't seem to pull if off, LOL!
You were jealous when your ex/non-ex started giving me *unwanted*
attention, and you are jealous of my greater tech understanding
and understanding of logic. It is not like you hide this, Steve.
LOL!

Re-read your own comments, Steve. You call me names, accuse of
things I never did,

Are you claiming that you never flooded Sandman's site? Or that you
never authored bunches of threads with his name in the title? Are you
saying that Sandman's "evidence" that you flooded his site isn't
"strong" ? Or that the Google archive is in error when it shows you as
the author of those many threads over the years?

LOL!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/26/10 9:12 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 7:31 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/26/10 7:27 PM:





Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 5:58 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/26/10 5:35 PM:

A good troll may not be very effective in the long run. Daniel
Johnsson is a pretty good troll. He pours out a lot of
misinformation, lies and misconceptions about more technical
issues that may look legit to the casual observer, but turns
out to be pure fantasy 9 times of 10.

This is neither you nor Steve. You actually seem rather
technically competent (though you are loath to admit your
weaknesses); Carroll, while he sometimes heads this way (such
as his BS about Mac problems which were clearly made up) tends
to just spew nonsense and nit picks.

Is this a reason why it's Sandman you've chosen to target with
your "professional" jealousy?

You are projecting.

Said the whining, delusional, lying hypocrite who flooded Sandman's
website and chased him around the ng for years because he's
jealous of Sandman's professional capabilities (that he'll never
possess because he's too busy spending his time trolling people on
usenet). Remind me again why over 100 posters have all labeled you
a liar troll or worse. LOL!

I have never claimed to be jealous of Sandman

You "never" had to, it was obvious to everyone who ever read more
than 7 of your posts.

Additional Hint: The scores (or is it hundreds?) of threads you've
created over the years with his name in the title were sort of a
giveaway.

, you or
anyone in CSMA. Jealousy, however, is clearly one of the things
that feeds your obvious hatred of me.

Sure... I really want to be a whining, delusional, lying hypocrite
to the level you are but I just can't seem to pull if off, LOL!
You were jealous when your ex/non-ex started giving me *unwanted*
attention, and you are jealous of my greater tech understanding
and understanding of logic. It is not like you hide this, Steve.
LOL!

Re-read your own comments, Steve. You call me names, accuse of
things I never did,

Are you claiming that you never flooded Sandman's site? Or that you
never authored bunches of threads with his name in the title? Are you
saying that Sandman's "evidence" that you flooded his site isn't
"strong" ? Or that the Google archive is in error when it shows you as
the author of those many threads over the years?

LOL!

Once again you realize you are wrong so you spew accusations and insults.
You cannot help but show your hatred and your jealousy.


--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Where are the android killer apps?
 

In article ,
"Big Crotch on a Small Fish" BigCrotch@SmallFish wrote:

Sure... I really want to be a whining, delusional, lying hypocrite
to the level you are but I just can't seem to pull if off, LOL!
You were jealous when your ex/non-ex started giving me *unwanted*
attention, and you are jealous of my greater tech understanding
and understanding of logic. It is not like you hide this, Steve.
LOL!

Re-read your own comments, Steve. You call me names, accuse of
things I never did,

Are you claiming that you never flooded Sandman's site? Or that you
never authored bunches of threads with his name in the title? Are you
saying that Sandman's "evidence" that you flooded his site isn't
"strong" ? Or that the Google archive is in error when it shows you as
the author of those many threads over the years?

LOL!

So basically, to keep up the illusion that Snit has Steve killfiled,
he has now introduced a new sock that replies with "LOL" to Steve,
which means that Snit can reply (five minutes later) to his sock
puppet and pretend he never saw the original post.


--
Sandman[.net]

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Sandman wrote:

So basically, to keep up the illusion that Snit has Steve killfiled,
he has now introduced a new sock that replies with "LOL" to Steve,
which means that Snit can reply (five minutes later) to his sock
puppet and pretend he never saw the original post.

That's our Snit... he has no one killfiled for one simple reason: He loves
any and all followups his posts get, regardelss of content or author. He
craves and loves the attention.

--
[tv]

President and CEO, Trollus Amongus LLC

May the forces of evil become lost and confused on the way to your house.

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Tattoo Vampire wrote:
Sandman wrote:

So basically, to keep up the illusion that Snit has Steve killfiled, he
has now introduced a new sock that replies with "LOL" to Steve, which
means that Snit can reply (five minutes later) to his sock puppet and
pretend he never saw the original post.

That's our Snit... he has no one killfiled for one simple reason: He
loves any and all followups his posts get, regardless of content or
author. He craves and loves the attention.

It is for this very reason among others that others and I have Snit
bozo-binned. He is a nasty ad hominem troll; that "Big Crotch on a Small
Fish" is a Michael Glasser sock is of no surprise.

Sandman did thorough research to prove Snit uses socks:

http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michae...ew_Sock_Puppet

(If you look to the menu at the right of Sandman's webpage, it has other
articles of interest (or non-interest) of Snit's trolling methods.)

Yup, "Big Crotch on a Small Fish" follows in the footsteps of other Snit
socks such as Joel Crump, Rhino Plastee, ceed, Omar Murad Asfour, Steve
Carroll's Dog and ad nauseum. As these posters have stated:

26- Edward Stanfield: "Snit thinks the rules that apply to honest and
honorable people apply to him. That is absurd. He is the biggest liar in
Usenet history. Mackay posted the email to prove Snit was using sock
puppets and he still is. Snit can not give up his socks puppets and
shills. They are the only ones who ever support him." 28 Jan 2009

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....52494d96d12229

99- Peter Kohlmann (COLA):
ceed: "Oh please, I have heard how stupid he is and his real name tons of
time. It's getting old."
Peter: "Snot Glasser is invading this group with his inane drivel, so he
has to bear what people think about that dishonest retard. And just for
the record: You *are* a Glasser sock" 30 Jan 2010

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....166f6fda92641b

--
HPT

Where are the android killer apps?
 

On Nov 26, 9:18*pm, Snit wrote:

(snip)

Re-read your own comments, Steve. You call me names, accuse of
things I never did,

Are you claiming that you never flooded Sandman's site? Or that you
never authored bunches of threads with his name in the title? Are you
saying that Sandman's "evidence" that you flooded his site isn't
"strong" ? Or that the Google archive is in error when it shows you as
the author of those many threads over the years?

LOL!

Once again you realize you are wrong so you spew accusations and insults.
You cannot help but show your hatred and your jealousy.

Those were called questions, Snit.

Where are the android killer apps?
 

On Nov 27, 1:46*am, Sandman wrote:
In article ,
*"Big Crotch on a Small Fish" BigCrotch@SmallFish wrote:





Sure... I really want to be a whining, delusional, lying hypocrite
to the level you are but I just can't seem to pull if off, LOL!
You were jealous when your ex/non-ex started giving me *unwanted*
attention, and you are jealous of my greater tech understanding
and understanding of logic. It is not like you hide this, Steve.
LOL!

Re-read your own comments, Steve. You call me names, accuse of
things I never did,

Are you claiming that you never flooded Sandman's site? Or that you
never authored bunches of threads with his name in the title? Are you
saying that Sandman's "evidence" that you flooded his site isn't
"strong" ? Or that the Google archive is in error when it shows you as
the author of those many threads over the years?

LOL!

So basically, to keep up the illusion that Snit has Steve killfiled,
he has now introduced a new sock that replies with "LOL" to Steve,
which means that Snit can reply (five minutes later) to his sock
puppet and pretend he never saw the original post.

Weird, isn't it?

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Sandman stated in post on
11/27/10 1:46 AM:

In article ,
"Big Crotch on a Small Fish" BigCrotch@SmallFish wrote:

Sure... I really want to be a whining, delusional, lying hypocrite
to the level you are but I just can't seem to pull if off, LOL!
You were jealous when your ex/non-ex started giving me *unwanted*
attention, and you are jealous of my greater tech understanding
and understanding of logic. It is not like you hide this, Steve.
LOL!

Re-read your own comments, Steve. You call me names, accuse of
things I never did,

Are you claiming that you never flooded Sandman's site? Or that you
never authored bunches of threads with his name in the title? Are you
saying that Sandman's "evidence" that you flooded his site isn't
"strong" ? Or that the Google archive is in error when it shows you as
the author of those many threads over the years?

LOL!

So basically, to keep up the illusion that Snit has Steve killfiled,
he has now introduced a new sock that replies with "LOL" to Steve,
which means that Snit can reply (five minutes later) to his sock
puppet and pretend he never saw the original post.

Proof that Steve's BS has humiliated him - his "crew" will now jump in and
start defending him and lying for him.

Got it.

And 100% predictable.

All because Steve did not know how to make aliases. And then I showed him
how. Oh no!


--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 27, 1:46 am, Sandman wrote:
In article ,
"Big Crotch on a Small Fish" BigCrotch@SmallFish wrote:





Sure... I really want to be a whining, delusional, lying
hypocrite to the level you are but I just can't seem to pull if
off, LOL! You were jealous when your ex/non-ex started giving
me *unwanted* attention, and you are jealous of my greater tech
understanding and understanding of logic. It is not like you
hide this, Steve. LOL!

Re-read your own comments, Steve. You call me names, accuse of
things I never did,

Are you claiming that you never flooded Sandman's site? Or that you
never authored bunches of threads with his name in the title? Are
you saying that Sandman's "evidence" that you flooded his site
isn't "strong" ? Or that the Google archive is in error when it
shows you as the author of those many threads over the years?

LOL!

So basically, to keep up the illusion that Snit has Steve killfiled,
he has now introduced a new sock that replies with "LOL" to Steve,
which means that Snit can reply (five minutes later) to his sock
puppet and pretend he never saw the original post.

Weird, isn't it?

LOL!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 9:18 pm, Snit wrote:

(snip)

Re-read your own comments, Steve. You call me names, accuse of
things I never did,

Are you claiming that you never flooded Sandman's site? Or that you
never authored bunches of threads with his name in the title? Are
you saying that Sandman's "evidence" that you flooded his site
isn't "strong" ? Or that the Google archive is in error when it
shows you as the author of those many threads over the years?

LOL!

Once again you realize you are wrong so you spew accusations and
insults. You cannot help but show your hatred and your jealousy.

Those were called questions, Snit.

LOL!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Sandman wrote:
In article ,
"Big Crotch on a Small Fish" BigCrotch@SmallFish wrote:

Sure... I really want to be a whining, delusional, lying
hypocrite to the level you are but I just can't seem to pull if
off, LOL! You were jealous when your ex/non-ex started giving me
*unwanted* attention, and you are jealous of my greater tech
understanding and understanding of logic. It is not like you
hide this, Steve. LOL!

Re-read your own comments, Steve. You call me names, accuse of
things I never did,

Are you claiming that you never flooded Sandman's site? Or that you
never authored bunches of threads with his name in the title? Are
you saying that Sandman's "evidence" that you flooded his site isn't
"strong" ? Or that the Google archive is in error when it shows you
as the author of those many threads over the years?

LOL!

So basically, to keep up the illusion that Snit has Steve killfiled,
he has now introduced a new sock that replies with "LOL" to Steve,
which means that Snit can reply (five minutes later) to his sock
puppet and pretend he never saw the original post.

LOL!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/27/10 8:09 AM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 9:18 pm, Snit wrote:

(snip)

Re-read your own comments, Steve. You call me names, accuse of
things I never did,

Are you claiming that you never flooded Sandman's site? Or that you
never authored bunches of threads with his name in the title? Are
you saying that Sandman's "evidence" that you flooded his site
isn't "strong" ? Or that the Google archive is in error when it
shows you as the author of those many threads over the years?

LOL!

Once again you realize you are wrong so you spew accusations and
insults. You cannot help but show your hatred and your jealousy.

Those were called questions, Snit.

LOL!

So let's take the first "question". Did I flood Sandman's site... of course
not. Sandman lied and when called on his lie he posted "evidence" in the
form of a text file which would take five minutes to create. In other
words, he offered *no* evidence. But years later Steve is still backing
Sandman... even bringing it up years later. This is tit-for-tat. Now that
Steve has made a complete ass out of himself and shown how desperate he is
to get my attention (using socks, etc.), Sandman is jumping up and down to
support Carroll.

Completely transparent trolling by the two of them. And completely
predictable... this is what happens when Steve has one of his tantrums - he
is proved to be a liar and then his buddies jump in to his rescue, as Steve
supports their lies.

So the only question is who is stupid enough to fall for their obvious BS -
so far HPT and Tattoo Vampire have claimed to be that gullible as to believe
these two liars. Anyone else?


--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Snit wrote:

Proof that Steve's BS has humiliated him - his "crew" will now jump in and
start defending him and lying for him.

I thought it was a "herd" and not a "crew".

--
[tv]

President and CEO, Trollus Amongus LLC

A crucifix? Oy vey, have you got the wrong vampire!

Where are the android killer apps?
 

On Nov 27, 8:23*am, Snit wrote:

(snip)

So let's take the first "question". *Did I flood Sandman's site... of course
not.

Are people supposed to believe you didn't flood his site merely
because you say you didn't? Let's pretend Jonas never posted the
evidence that he did about you flooding his site as we ask:

If you're not to be presumed innocent up front then how should you be
considered? Presumed guilty?

Sandman lied and when called on his lie he posted "evidence" in the
form of a text file which would take five minutes to create.

What we have here is a situation where you didn't present evidence for
something you've claimed about me (being on your site for hours - you
only talked about having evidence for that), contrasted with Sandman
"actually" presenting evidence for his claim about you flooding his
site. Strangely, you expect to be believed and expect people to not
believe him. Totally hypocritical and totally absurd.


*In other words, he offered *no* evidence.

LOL! You just wrote:

"...he posted "evidence" in the form of a text file"

I looked at it the evidence... as others may have (certainly you
looked, that's how you even knew it was a text file).

*But years later Steve is still backing Sandman...

I happen to believe him over you... and I doubt I'd be the only
person in this ng to do so. You have given people a lot of "evidence"
that you are dishonest... as "evidenced" by the quotes list.

So the only question is who is stupid enough to fall for their obvious BS -

So your only "defense" that you *didn't* flood his site is your claim
that you didn't... got it.

so far HPT and Tattoo Vampire have claimed to be that gullible as to believe
these two liars. *Anyone else?

Why stop with Jonas? Why not call the entire list of people on your
quotes list "liars"? After all, they have all labeled you a liar,
troll or worse.

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Cool! Another set of asshole crossposters to kill file!

"Steve Carroll" wrote in message
...
On Nov 27, 8:23 am, Snit wrote:

(snip)

So let's take the first "question". Did I flood Sandman's site... of
course
not.

Are people supposed to believe you didn't flood his site merely
because you say you didn't? Let's pretend Jonas never posted the
evidence that he did about you flooding his site as we ask:

If you're not to be presumed innocent up front then how should you be
considered? Presumed guilty?

Sandman lied and when called on his lie he posted "evidence" in the
form of a text file which would take five minutes to create.

What we have here is a situation where you didn't present evidence for
something you've claimed about me (being on your site for hours - you
only talked about having evidence for that), contrasted with Sandman
"actually" presenting evidence for his claim about you flooding his
site. Strangely, you expect to be believed and expect people to not
believe him. Totally hypocritical and totally absurd.


In other words, he offered *no* evidence.

LOL! You just wrote:

"...he posted "evidence" in the form of a text file"

I looked at it the evidence... as others may have (certainly you
looked, that's how you even knew it was a text file).

But years later Steve is still backing Sandman...

I happen to believe him over you... and I doubt I'd be the only
person in this ng to do so. You have given people a lot of "evidence"
that you are dishonest... as "evidenced" by the quotes list.

So the only question is who is stupid enough to fall for their obvious
BS -

So your only "defense" that you *didn't* flood his site is your claim
that you didn't... got it.

so far HPT and Tattoo Vampire have claimed to be that gullible as to
believe
these two liars. Anyone else?

Why stop with Jonas? Why not call the entire list of people on your
quotes list "liars"? After all, they have all labeled you a liar,
troll or worse.

Where are the android killer apps?
 

cshenk stated in post on
11/27/10 12:06 PM:

Cool! Another set of asshole crossposters to kill file!

"Steve Carroll" wrote in message
...
On Nov 27, 8:23 am, Snit wrote:

(snip)

So let's take the first "question". Did I flood Sandman's site... of
course
not.

Are people supposed to believe you didn't flood his site merely
because you say you didn't?

What "people"? You? You are going to pretend to believe it even though
there is no evidence. It is just what you do, Steve: you lie.

But, of course, Sandman and his site are irrelevant to your current
humiliation: you are embarrassed that you did not know how to make multiple
aliases - I showed you - you still failed to be able to do so in any view
other than icon view - so I showed you how to do it in other views.

For most people this would not be a big deal - we all learn and we all have
things we do not know. But you were so embarrassed you freaked out, started
posted with socks *again* and then cross posted all over the place.

....
But years later Steve is still backing Sandman...

I happen to believe him over you...

You will claim to, even though the evidence shows he is a liar... even his
own site is filled with lies. But you are a liar, too. Oh well. It is not
like this will change because I call you out on your lies.



--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Where are the android killer apps?
 

On Nov 27, 12:26*pm, Snit wrote:


So let's take the first "question". Did I flood Sandman's site... of
course
not.

Are people supposed to believe you didn't flood his site merely
because you say you didn't?

What "people"?

Anyone reading your drivel, obviously. Do you know *anyone* that
*doesn't* believe you'd flood a website?

*You? *You are going to pretend to believe it even though
there is no evidence.

Why do you keep saying there is no evidence when you just admitted
there was evidence?

"...he posted "evidence" in the form of a text file" - Snit

You will claim to, even though the evidence shows he is a liar

Incorrect. I've seen no evidence by you that you didn't flood his
site... a thing you can't possibly produce unless you can show you
were away from a computer at the time. How do you propose to do that?

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 27, 12:26 pm, Snit wrote:


So let's take the first "question". Did I flood Sandman's site...
of course
not.

Are people supposed to believe you didn't flood his site merely
because you say you didn't?

What "people"?

Anyone reading your drivel, obviously. Do you know *anyone* that
*doesn't* believe you'd flood a website?

You? You are going to pretend to believe it even though
there is no evidence.

Why do you keep saying there is no evidence when you just admitted
there was evidence?

"...he posted "evidence" in the form of a text file" - Snit

You will claim to, even though the evidence shows he is a liar

Incorrect. I've seen no evidence by you that you didn't flood his
site... a thing you can't possibly produce unless you can show you
were away from a computer at the time. How do you propose to do that?

LOL!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 27, 8:23 am, Snit wrote:

(snip)

So let's take the first "question". Did I flood Sandman's site... of
course not.

Are people supposed to believe you didn't flood his site merely
because you say you didn't? Let's pretend Jonas never posted the
evidence that he did about you flooding his site as we ask:

If you're not to be presumed innocent up front then how should you be
considered? Presumed guilty?

Sandman lied and when called on his lie he posted "evidence" in the
form of a text file which would take five minutes to create.

What we have here is a situation where you didn't present evidence for
something you've claimed about me (being on your site for hours - you
only talked about having evidence for that), contrasted with Sandman
"actually" presenting evidence for his claim about you flooding his
site. Strangely, you expect to be believed and expect people to not
believe him. Totally hypocritical and totally absurd.


In other words, he offered *no* evidence.

LOL! You just wrote:

"...he posted "evidence" in the form of a text file"

I looked at it the evidence... as others may have (certainly you
looked, that's how you even knew it was a text file).

But years later Steve is still backing Sandman...

I happen to believe him over you... and I doubt I'd be the only
person in this ng to do so. You have given people a lot of "evidence"
that you are dishonest... as "evidenced" by the quotes list.

So the only question is who is stupid enough to fall for their
obvious BS -

So your only "defense" that you *didn't* flood his site is your claim
that you didn't... got it.

so far HPT and Tattoo Vampire have claimed to be that gullible as to
believe these two liars. Anyone else?

Why stop with Jonas? Why not call the entire list of people on your
quotes list "liars"? After all, they have all labeled you a liar,
troll or worse.

LOL!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/27/10 2:33 PM:

Why stop with Jonas? Why not call the entire list of people on your
quotes list "liars"? After all, they have all labeled you a liar,
troll or worse.

LOL!

It is not a mere claim that Sandman lied - his lies are still on his site -
pages and pages of lies:

* * 1 http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Gibberish
* * 2 http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Css_Validation
* * 3 http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Quote_Forging
* * 4 http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Tilde
* * 5 http://csma.sandman.net/pages/PDFforgery
* * 6 http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet
7 http://csma.sandman.net/TrollScoring/Snit
8 http://csma.sandman.net/plain/ascii.php?name=Snit

Let me guess: those lies of his do not count. LOL!

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Where are the android killer apps?
 

On Nov 27, 2:40*pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/27/10 2:33 PM:

Why stop with Jonas? Why not call the entire list of people on your
quotes list "liars"? After all, they have all labeled you a liar,
troll or worse.

LOL!

It is not a mere claim that Sandman lied

Prove that Sandman "lied" when he supplied "evidence" that you flooded
his site.

(snip off topic delusions by a gluehead)

Staty away from open flames tonight, Snit;)

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 27, 2:40 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/27/10 2:33 PM:

Why stop with Jonas? Why not call the entire list of people on your
quotes list "liars"? After all, they have all labeled you a liar,
troll or worse.

LOL!

It is not a mere claim that Sandman lied

Prove that Sandman "lied" when he supplied "evidence" that you flooded
his site.

(snip off topic delusions by a gluehead)

Staty away from open flames tonight, Snit;)

LOL!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/27/10 3:11 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 27, 2:40 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/27/10 2:33 PM:

Why stop with Jonas? Why not call the entire list of people on your
quotes list "liars"? After all, they have all labeled you a liar,
troll or worse.

LOL!

It is not a mere claim that Sandman lied - his lies are still on his site -
pages and pages of lies:

* * 1 http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Gibberish
* * 2 http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Css_Validation
* * 3 http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Quote_Forging
* * 4 http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Tilde
* * 5 http://csma.sandman.net/pages/PDFforgery
* * 6 http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet
7 http://csma.sandman.net/TrollScoring/Snit
8 http://csma.sandman.net/plain/ascii.php?name=Snit

Let me guess: those lies of his do not count. LOL!

Prove that Sandman "lied" when he supplied "evidence" that you flooded
his site.

LOL! I was exactly right. The fact that Sandman is a proved liar has no
bearing on Steve's need to "believe" him.

Yeah, Steve, your hatred and irrationality does not get the better of you.
LOL!


--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Where are the android killer apps?
 

In article
,
Steve Carroll wrote:

On Nov 27, 1:46*am, Sandman wrote:
In article ,
*"Big Crotch on a Small Fish" BigCrotch@SmallFish wrote:





Sure... I really want to be a whining, delusional, lying hypocrite
to the level you are but I just can't seem to pull if off, LOL!
You were jealous when your ex/non-ex started giving me *unwanted*
attention, and you are jealous of my greater tech understanding
and understanding of logic. It is not like you hide this, Steve.
LOL!

Re-read your own comments, Steve. You call me names, accuse of
things I never did,

Are you claiming that you never flooded Sandman's site? Or that you
never authored bunches of threads with his name in the title? Are you
saying that Sandman's "evidence" that you flooded his site isn't
"strong" ? Or that the Google archive is in error when it shows you as
the author of those many threads over the years?

LOL!

So basically, to keep up the illusion that Snit has Steve killfiled,
he has now introduced a new sock that replies with "LOL" to Steve,
which means that Snit can reply (five minutes later) to his sock
puppet and pretend he never saw the original post.

Weird, isn't it?

No, it's Snit. It's fully expected.


--
Sandman[.net]

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Sandman stated in post on
11/27/10 4:04 PM:

So basically, to keep up the illusion that Snit has Steve killfiled,
he has now introduced a new sock that replies with "LOL" to Steve,
which means that Snit can reply (five minutes later) to his sock
puppet and pretend he never saw the original post.

Weird, isn't it?

No, it's Snit. It's fully expected.

Ahhh, you two are cuddling again. How cuuuuute.

But news flash: nobody is stupid enough to buy your BS. If they are, all
they have to do is look at Steve's recent behavior where he had a breakdown
/ tantrum and Sandman's site where he has pages of lies posted about me:

* * 1 http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Gibberish
* * 2 http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Css_Validation
* * 3 http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Quote_Forging
* * 4 http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Tilde
* * 5 http://csma.sandman.net/pages/PDFforgery
* * 6 http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet
7 http://csma.sandman.net/TrollScoring/Snit
8 http://csma.sandman.net/plain/ascii.php?name=Snit

There is simply no reason to think either of you are sane.

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/30/10 10:37 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 30, 10:01 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/30/10 9:51 PM:

...

Rings like a bell;) YOu may have missed it... Snit recently told
a whopper of a tale:

"I get that it is different for cars, but when I bought a car a
while
back (some time ago now), the salesman was on the phone... so he
handed me the keys to the lock boxes on the cars and told me to
test
any car I wanted... just be back before closing... about 5 hours
later. He did not even get my ID." - Snit

And the "whopper" is? Come on, Steve... this whole thing is about


... you making an unsupported claim that was absurd and telling
people who to call to check, which I did... and it indicated you
were lying.

The idiotic gluehead also posted the number of the place

Who did?

You gave the name of the place... whatever. Someone busted you on
your lie and now you're forced to nitpick in a feeble attempt to
pretend it didn't happen. It must suck to be you. LOL!


so I called it. The guy Snit claimed did this stuff no longer
works there (gee, what a shock).

Yeah, about 10 years after I bought a car the same salesman is not
there...

So why you'd say to call the guy? You didn't talk about the 10 years
*before* you suggested someone call him. Funny, that.

The manager told me it was policy that they get an ID because
they need to be sure you're a licensed driver (like that was
ever in question).

You are the *only* one who questioned that, Steve.

Correction: I was the person who *mentioned* it to you when I called
BS on your story. Perhaps you missed it.. no one else bothered to
even listen to your BS story on this. But I did;)

I also asked if it was possible that a salesperson hand over the
lock box keys to a customer and leave them unattended (for 5
hours, to hear Snit tell it) ... he did what I expected... he
laughed his ass off;)

Right: you *asked* that on the phone

Because you claimed it happened there. That the guy laughed is
"strong evidence" that you lied about it happening there. Of
course, I already knew what his answer would be I just wanted to
see what his reaction was while he was giving it.

Hmmm... next time I call there I think I'm going to point the guy
to the posts where you mentioned Tim's Toyota and then I'll mention
you by name. Who knows... maybe we can even find out what happened
to ol' Ron Gilmore;)

LOL!

I note I was trusted.

You claim the idea of being trusted is "absurd". You insist trust is
a lie. it is completely outside of your experience. You do not trust
others and they do not trust you. Hence the reason, once I
introduced the concept to you, you begged me to help you understand
how to set a good first impression...

You made up stories about me talking about policy - I did no such
thing... and claim it is "nit picking" to mention how you fabricate
things. Then you claim the idea that a current sales person does not
know about an incidence that happened about a decade ago is evidence
that I do as you do and lie.

You are insane. All of this because unlike you, I am generally
trusted... and while it was rather cool to get the level of trust I
did from Ron, it was not something completely outside of what I would
expect from people. I trust people and, generally, they trust me.

And your jealousy and anger are apparent in your every post.

Oh, and unless you get more interesting with this sock prepare to be
ignored. You are getting repetitive and boring - snipping and
running from questions. For example, you never did respond to which
names you will currently own up to having used. Here is the list
again:

"Evil" John *
"Evil" Snit *
Big Crotch on a Small Fish
Cornelius Munshower
CSMA Moderator
Edward Stanfield
Fretwiz *
Hitman Hero
Measles
Petruzzellis Kids
Sigmond
Slaveen
Smit
Steve C *
Steve Camoll *
Steve Carroll *
Steve Carroll *
Steve Carroll *
Steve Carroll's Dog *
Steve Carrolll *
Steve Carrroll *
Yevette Owens
Yobo_Obyo

Come on, Steve, which will you currently own up to? Funny how you
did not answer that question. And you never will.

[Yes, Steve, as I said before, I know you will run like a scared
bunny... you know those names are all ones you have used]

Hey, Gluey, I already answered. The answer is: **** YOU!


--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

Where are the android killer apps?
 

Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/30/10 11:03 PM:

Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/30/10 10:52 PM:

I note I was trusted.

You claim the idea of being trusted is "absurd". You insist trust
is a lie. it is completely outside of your experience. You do not
trust others and they do not trust you. Hence the reason, once I
introduced the concept to you, you begged me to help you
understand how to set a good first impression...

You made up stories about me talking about policy - I did no such
thing... and claim it is "nit picking" to mention how you
fabricate things. Then you claim the idea that a current sales
person does not know about an incidence that happened about a
decade ago is evidence that I do as you do and lie.

You are insane. All of this because unlike you, I am generally
trusted... and while it was rather cool to get the level of trust
I did from Ron, it was not something completely outside of what I
would expect from people. I trust people and, generally, they
trust me.

And your jealousy and anger are apparent in your every post.

Oh, and unless you get more interesting with this sock prepare to
be ignored. You are getting repetitive and boring - snipping and
running from questions. For example, you never did respond to
which names you will currently own up to having used. Here is
the list again:

"Evil" John *
"Evil" Snit *
Big Crotch on a Small Fish
Cornelius Munshower
CSMA Moderator
Edward Stanfield
Fretwiz *
Hitman Hero
Measles
Petruzzellis Kids
Sigmond
Slaveen
Smit
Steve C *
Steve Camoll *
Steve Carroll *
Steve Carroll *
Steve Carroll *
Steve Carroll's Dog *
Steve Carrolll *
Steve Carrroll *
Yevette Owens
Yobo_Obyo

Come on, Steve, which will you currently own up to? Funny how you
did not answer that question. And you never will.

[Yes, Steve, as I said before, I know you will run like a scared
bunny... you know those names are all ones you have used]

**** YOU! There, I answered.

And it is the best answer you will ever give... because you know you
backed yourself into a corner. Again. As I have noted: you lie
more in one day than I lie in a decade. And that is not an
exaggeration.

Oh, and Steve, now that you are posting as your sock with more than
"LOL", you might want to post with your standard name - otherwise
you will be left explaining how I predicted you would stop posting
before "I" changed patterns.

LOL!

Yes, Steve, your stupidity got you busted. Again.

**** YOU!

Poor Steve... so made he was busted with all his socks. So very,
very mad.

**** YOU!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

What's the non-Android killer app exactly?
 

On 2010-12-01, Big Crotch on a Small Fish BigCrotch@SmallFish wrote:
Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/30/10 10:37 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 30, 10:01 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/30/10 9:51 PM:

What's the non-Android killer app exactly?

[deletia]

--
OpenDoc is moot when Apple is your one stop iShop. |||
/ | \

What's the non-Android killer app exactly?
 

On Dec 1, 5:55*pm, JEDIDIAH wrote:
On 2010-12-01, Big Crotch on a Small Fish BigCrotch@SmallFish wrote:

Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/30/10 10:37 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 30, 10:01 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/30/10 9:51 PM:

* * * What's the non-Android killer app exactly?

[deletia]

--
* * * * OpenDoc is moot when Apple is your one stop iShop. * * *|||
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * */ | \ *

LOL! Don't get sucked in. Once you see a thread over a 100 posts you
can rest assured it's just the Snit and Steve Carroll circus. 12 years
+ they've been arguing back and forth about nothing, literally
nothing. Some threads well over 1000 posts that nobody reads. They
are quite insane as most Mac users are.

What's the non-Android killer app exactly?
 

On Dec 2, 12:41*am, MuahMan wrote:
On Dec 1, 5:55*pm, JEDIDIAH wrote:





On 2010-12-01, Big Crotch on a Small Fish BigCrotch@SmallFish wrote:

Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/30/10 10:37 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 30, 10:01 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/30/10 9:51 PM:

* * * What's the non-Android killer app exactly?

[deletia]

--
* * * * OpenDoc is moot when Apple is your one stop iShop. * * *|||
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * */ | \ *

LOL! Don't get sucked in. Once you see a thread over a 100 posts you
can rest assured it's just the Snit and Steve Carroll circus. 12 years
+ they've been arguing back and forth about nothing, literally
nothing. Some threads well *over 1000 posts that nobody reads.

Being an inmate here yourself you know that only those with 'special'
training can handle an inmate like Snit. You don't want him roaming
the general population again, do you? ;)

They are quite insane as most Mac users are.

What kind of a thing is that to say from a guy who just admitted
owning a Ducati (especially one like yours!) is like owning a Mac.

What's the non-Android killer app exactly?
 

MuahMan stated in post
on 12/2/10
12:41 AM:

On Dec 1, 5:55*pm, JEDIDIAH wrote:
On 2010-12-01, Big Crotch on a Small Fish BigCrotch@SmallFish wrote:

Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/30/10 10:37 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 30, 10:01 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/30/10 9:51 PM:

* * * What's the non-Android killer app exactly?

[deletia]

--
* * * * OpenDoc is moot when Apple is your one stop iShop. * * *|||
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * */ | \ *

LOL! Don't get sucked in. Once you see a thread over a 100 posts you
can rest assured it's just the Snit and Steve Carroll circus. 12 years
+ they've been arguing back and forth about nothing, literally
nothing. Some threads well over 1000 posts that nobody reads. They
are quite insane as most Mac users are.

I mostly ignore Steve these days... I do not generally even see his posts (I
have them marked to be read... though I do sometimes turn that off when he
is thowing one of his amusing tantrums). But Steve is desperate for my
attention... and I admit I like to see how far his breakdowns will go. He
has gone to using socks, tracking me down and threatening to try to get me
fired (for impersonating the person he claims I am - as I said, he is
insane). You can tell when his mental break is getting extreme by how he
cannot handle more than a word or two from each post - snipping it and then
freaking out... changing topics, spewing lies, cross-posting his drivel all
over Usenet, spewing bigoted and misogynistic comments, etc.

But, after a while, when he is completely mentally gone, it gets boring. He
no longer is even reading what he replies to - he simply cannot handle it.
He just snips and shares his tantrums.

As others have noted, though, I have extreme patience... and, given how
hateful Steve is, I admit I sorta enjoy watching him self destruct like
that. Still... I would enjoy it *more* if he could pull himself together,
let go of his hatred and jealousy and leave 2003 in the past.

But I really, really doubt he will.


--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

What's the non-Android killer app exactly?
 

On Dec 2, 7:49Â*am, Snit wrote:
MuahMan stated in post
on 12/2/10
12:41 AM:





On Dec 1, 5:55 pm, JEDIDIAH wrote:
On 2010-12-01, Big Crotch on a Small Fish BigCrotch@SmallFish wrote:

Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/30/10 10:37 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 30, 10:01 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/30/10 9:51 PM:

What's the non-Android killer app exactly?

[deletia]

--
OpenDoc is moot when Apple is your one stop iShop. |||
/ | \

LOL! Don't get sucked in. Once you see a thread over a 100 posts you
can rest assured it's just the Snit and Steve Carroll circus. 12 years
+ they've been arguing back and forth about nothing, literally
nothing. Some threads well Â*over 1000 posts that nobody reads. They
are quite insane as most Mac users are.

I mostly ignore Steve these days.

I keep tellin' ya... people just aren't as stupid as you need them to
be. Everyone sees you create sock puppets (or access the ones your
shills create) for the purpose of responding to me as you focus on me
instead of what I'm saying... which runs counter to your obvious ol'
lie:

"‪I do not focus on personalities - I focus on the content of your
posts" - Snit

What a *total* crock. LOL!

(snip fumed induced drooling by Snit)

What's the non-Android killer app exactly?
 

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Dec 2, 12:41 am, MuahMan wrote:
On Dec 1, 5:55 pm, JEDIDIAH wrote:





On 2010-12-01, Big Crotch on a Small Fish BigCrotch@SmallFish
wrote:

Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/30/10 10:37 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 30, 10:01 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/30/10 9:51 PM:

What's the non-Android killer app exactly?

[deletia]

--
OpenDoc is moot when Apple is your one stop iShop. |||
/ | \

LOL! Don't get sucked in. Once you see a thread over a 100 posts you
can rest assured it's just the Snit and Steve Carroll circus. 12
years + they've been arguing back and forth about nothing, literally
nothing. Some threads well over 1000 posts that nobody reads.

Being an inmate here yourself you know that only those with 'special'
training can handle an inmate like Snit. You don't want him roaming
the general population again, do you? ;)

They are quite insane as most Mac users are.

What kind of a thing is that to say from a guy who just admitted
owning a Ducati (especially one like yours!) is like owning a Mac.

LOL!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

What's the non-Android killer app exactly?
 

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Dec 2, 7:49 am, Snit wrote:
MuahMan stated in post
on
12/2/10 12:41 AM:





On Dec 1, 5:55 pm, JEDIDIAH wrote:
On 2010-12-01, Big Crotch on a Small Fish BigCrotch@SmallFish
wrote:

Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/30/10 10:37 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 30, 10:01 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/30/10 9:51 PM:

What's the non-Android killer app exactly?

[deletia]

--
OpenDoc is moot when Apple is your one stop iShop. |||
/ | \

LOL! Don't get sucked in. Once you see a thread over a 100 posts you
can rest assured it's just the Snit and Steve Carroll circus. 12
years + they've been arguing back and forth about nothing, literally
nothing. Some threads well over 1000 posts that nobody reads. They
are quite insane as most Mac users are.

I mostly ignore Steve these days.

I keep tellin' ya... people just aren't as stupid as you need them to
be. Everyone sees you create sock puppets (or access the ones your
shills create) for the purpose of responding to me as you focus on me
instead of what I'm saying... which runs counter to your obvious ol'
lie:

"?I do not focus on personalities - I focus on the content of your
posts" - Snit

What a *total* crock. LOL!

(snip fumed induced drooling by Snit)

LOL!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch