Rhipsalis
Now that I have seen the photo of your plant, it looks like the very common
Rhipsalis baccifera not Rhipsalis teres nor R.cereuscula. It is not the same as Lance's plant but a different Rhipsalis species altogether. Lynne wrote in message ... Ok, I think I got it now. My teres looked just like that when it was rooting. But I see in the pic that if it were teres, the newer leaves would be a little bit longer, and growing at a slightly smaller angle. If I hadn't just spent a half an hour comparing photos of the two, I'd never know the difference in such a young specimen. "Cereoid-UR12yo" wrote in message . .. Somebody must have misidentified your plant. It is a poorly grown Rhipsalis cereuscula. Lynne wrote in message ... It looks like a plant I have that was identified as Rhipsalis teres. "Lance R." wrote in message . com... large image: http://www.lkgallery.com/plant1.jpg Thanks for the help, Lance |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter