Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dendrobium Ursula x Neo-Hawaii
Can't claim much credit for this - only bought it a couple of weeks ago.
The tag says Ursula x Neo-Hawaii. Seems to me that makes it 50% lineale, 25% discolor & 25% phalaenopsis. Given the appearance of the blooms, I'm not sure I believe the tag. But I love it just the same. Dave Gillingham ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To email me remove the .private from my email address. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Dendrobium Ursula x Neo-Hawaii
On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 21:47:13 +1000, Dave Gillingham
wrote: Can't claim much credit for this - only bought it a couple of weeks ago. The tag says Ursula x Neo-Hawaii. Seems to me that makes it 50% lineale, 25% discolor & 25% phalaenopsis. Given the appearance of the blooms, I'm not sure I believe the tag. But I love it just the same. Dave Gillingham ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To email me remove the .private from my email address. Love this style and shape. It is to die for. Is there a difference in the forms of lineale? I have Ursula's lineale listed as veratifolium, and Neo-Hawaii's lineale as Den grantii. And the discolor was known as undulatum when it was registered. I just wondered if they were the differences? Any chance there was another plant known for a while as one of these misnomers? SuE http://orchids.legolas.org/gallery/main.php |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Dendrobium Ursula x Neo-Hawaii
Oh boy, I am with Sue here Dave, love it. Especially the surprised look!
I would name it "UR Neo Love" -- Cheers Wendy No Spam Email Address Invalid Dave Gillingham wrote: Can't claim much credit for this - only bought it a couple of weeks ago. The tag says Ursula x Neo-Hawaii. Seems to me that makes it 50% lineale, 25% discolor & 25% phalaenopsis. Given the appearance of the blooms, I'm not sure I believe the tag. But I love it just the same. Dave Gillingham ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To email me remove the .private from my email address. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Dendrobium Ursula x Neo-Hawaii
On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 10:29:29 -0700, SuE wrote:
On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 21:47:13 +1000, Dave Gillingham wrote: Can't claim much credit for this - only bought it a couple of weeks ago. The tag says Ursula x Neo-Hawaii. Seems to me that makes it 50% lineale, 25% discolor & 25% phalaenopsis. Given the appearance of the blooms, I'm not sure I believe the tag. But I love it just the same. Dave Gillingham ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To email me remove the .private from my email address. Love this style and shape. It is to die for. Is there a difference in the forms of lineale? I have Ursula's lineale listed as veratifolium, and Neo-Hawaii's lineale as Den grantii. And the discolor was known as undulatum when it was registered. I just wondered if they were the differences? Any chance there was another plant known for a while as one of these misnomers? SuE http://orchids.legolas.org/gallery/main.php Sue, D. lineale seems to be a very variable species. I've attached 3 pics scanned from Lavarack, Harris & Stocker, and from a fairly new book "Spatulata Orchids of Papua New Guinea" published by the Orchid Society of Papua New Guinea. None of them would provide the colouration of my plant, nor the very tall antelope lateral sepals. Seems more like antennatum or tangerinum in shape, but colouration similar to at least one photo I've seen of helix. Dave Gillingham ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To email me remove the .private from my email address. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Dendrobium Ursula x Neo-Hawaii
Thanks for the lesson too Dave re Spatulata & antelope lateral sepals.
-- Cheers Wendy No Spam Email Address Invalid Dave Gillingham wrote: On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 10:29:29 -0700, SuE wrote: On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 21:47:13 +1000, Dave Gillingham wrote: Can't claim much credit for this - only bought it a couple of weeks ago. The tag says Ursula x Neo-Hawaii. Seems to me that makes it 50% lineale, 25% discolor & 25% phalaenopsis. Given the appearance of the blooms, I'm not sure I believe the tag. But I love it just the same. Dave Gillingham ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To email me remove the .private from my email address. Love this style and shape. It is to die for. Is there a difference in the forms of lineale? I have Ursula's lineale listed as veratifolium, and Neo-Hawaii's lineale as Den grantii. And the discolor was known as undulatum when it was registered. I just wondered if they were the differences? Any chance there was another plant known for a while as one of these misnomers? SuE http://orchids.legolas.org/gallery/main.php Sue, D. lineale seems to be a very variable species. I've attached 3 pics scanned from Lavarack, Harris & Stocker, and from a fairly new book "Spatulata Orchids of Papua New Guinea" published by the Orchid Society of Papua New Guinea. None of them would provide the colouration of my plant, nor the very tall antelope lateral sepals. Seems more like antennatum or tangerinum in shape, but colouration similar to at least one photo I've seen of helix. Dave Gillingham ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To email me remove the .private from my email address. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Dendrobium Ursula x Neo-Hawaii
And the discolor was known as undulatum when
it was registered. And discolor is a/k/a broomfieldii. When I first acquired my "big mama" discolor, it was labelled undulatum v. broomfieldii. Some research took me to discolor. Diana |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Dendrobium Ursula x Neo-Hawaii
None of them would provide the colouration of my plant, nor the very tall
antelope lateral sepals. Seems more like antennatum or tangerinum A friend has a specimen sized antennatum which has been awarded, so I'm pretty familiar with the plant. I can vouch for the tall lateral sepals. Diana |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Dendrobium Ursula x Neo-Hawaii
On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 10:29:29 -0700, SuE wrote:
On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 21:47:13 +1000, Dave Gillingham wrote: Can't claim much credit for this - only bought it a couple of weeks ago. The tag says Ursula x Neo-Hawaii. Seems to me that makes it 50% lineale, 25% discolor & 25% phalaenopsis. Given the appearance of the blooms, I'm not sure I believe the tag. But I love it just the same. Dave Gillingham ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To email me remove the .private from my email address. Love this style and shape. It is to die for. Is there a difference in the forms of lineale? I have Ursula's lineale listed as veratifolium, and Neo-Hawaii's lineale as Den grantii. And the discolor was known as undulatum when it was registered. I just wondered if they were the differences? Any chance there was another plant known for a while as one of these misnomers? SuE http://orchids.legolas.org/gallery/main.php Oops! I got carried away with the lineale bit, & overlooked the rest :-( Not sure about the rest of your queries, Sue. But discolor doesn't have the tall lateral sepals, though it's still from Section Spatulata. Its colouring is anything from chocolate through tan, to canary yellow in var, broomfieldii that Diana mentioned below. And as you probably know, phalaenopsis is usually mauve, with a very rounded shape. Dave Gillingham ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To email me remove the .private from my email address. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rauski ja NEO Suomalaista sosialismia | Edible Gardening | |||
Probably not Dendrobium Ursula x Neo-Hawaii | Orchid Photos | |||
Neo's | Orchids | |||
aerides falcata Q not neo falcata | Orchids |