Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Reka wrote:
................ ............................... Okay, I know a little about orchids, but more about orchards, a subject that I have grown up with. (Shades of those poor newbies who think this is "rec.gardens.orchards"!) Over here, we have problems with hail damage on apple crops from summer to early fall. Thus, hail netting is stretched over the trees during that time period. Very dark green, black, or white nets have been used. It has been proven that the red apples under white netting color up much better than those under the other two dark colors. Now, how this can be correlated to orchids, I don't know, but perhaps it is worth the time I took to write it. And I am a slow typer. :-) I am assuming it could be the extra heat generated under the darker colors that prevent better color. Red apples need temperature swings from cool nights to warmer days without rain in order to color up well. Hi Reka. We haven't had one of those orchard/orchid confused people in a while now. About the red apples under white netting... You are obviously right about better color with cooler temperatures. That's why they grow a lot of Macintosh apples in Vermont and here in northern New York but not much farther south. I bet heat isn't the factor with the netting though. I'm not sure a dark netting would cause more heat around the trees. (Also not 100% sure it wouldn't.) I bet it's just more light getting through. You KNOW the apples color up better on the sunny side of the tree. My first thought was that maybe this does translate into better orchids and the better light that colors up apples would probably help orchid blooming. On second thought, if it's just the quantity of light, then for orchids that need the shade, they need the right amount of shade and it probably doesn't matter if that amount is created by black or white cloth. Steve |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Ray" wrote in message ... Well Ted, I guess we can ignore light reflected from the plants, since it's the wavelength they don't use. Then we have to speculate on the reflectivity of the benches, floor, media, algae, moss, etc. No, we can't ignore light reflected from the plants. The light reflected from a plant appears green because there is more green light than anything else, but that does not imply that there is no blue or red. Blue and red light may well be present in the reflected light, but in equal values of the plant looks green, or a bit more red if there is a reddish hue to the leaves. From a scientific perspective, we can not say that all green light is reflected by leaves, nor that all red and blue light is absorbed. All we can say is that more green light is reflected by the leaves and more blue and red light is absorbed. And of the light that enters the leaves, more of the green light will pass right through while less blue or red light will pass through. Most leaves are translucent; not opaque! While I didn't mention it before, there is the question of light that passes through the leaves. In most species, if you hold a leaf up to the light, you can see light coming through the leaf, and this light is normally green, and this happens even though you can not normally see anything on the other side of the leaf. This will be greater or less depending on the species, but the important point to remember is that there is no such thing as an energy conversion process that is 100% efficiency. It is unusual to get better than 5 to 10 % efficiency, although I suppose that with some creativity, some engineer might come up with something better. In the biological world, the vast majority of energy of light of any frequency is either reflected or absorbed and converted to heat. And you're right. If we are to be thorough, we'd have to consider everything in the greenhouse. Consideration of allgae and live moss, though, could be lumped together with the other plants in the greenhouse as they'd have similar properties. As they'd all be using the same process of photosynthesis, they'd all have very similar optical properties. Alas, things get much more complicated as we consider them in more detail. Here is a question that might help understand the implications of this. You have two surfaces, both subject to the same white light. One surface appears to be dark green and the other appears to be light green. Since both are subject to the same white light, they both get the same amount of green light. How, then does one appear lighter than the other? Here is a tip, to help answer the above question: In computer graphics, one can lighten the color green obtained from the brightest green setting for a set of pixels by adding equal amounts of blue and red. You can break the light coming from a pixel, in this context, into two components: one made of pure green light and another made of white light. I use this routinely in any computer graphics I add to my applications. My guess is that it's insignificant compared to the incoming light. -- I am not so sure. I will not say anything definitive, since I have not seen reports of experiments designed to test it, nor have I done any myself. However, theory suggests it could be significant and Reka has provided some evidence that plants are affected by the color of netting used, in her case for protection from hail, but the purpose of the netting is immaterial here. Cheers, Ted -- R.E. (Ted) Byers, Ph.D., Ed.D. R & D Decision Support Solutions http://www.randddecisionsupportsolutions.com/ Healthy Living Through Informed Decision Making |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Ray wrote: Well Ted, I guess we can ignore light reflected from the plants, since it's the wavelength they don't use. Then we have to speculate on the reflectivity of the benches, floor, media, algae, moss, etc. My guess is that it's insignificant compared to the incoming light. Not contributing much to the discussion, but I did research some interesting articles regarding light used, benefits of reflection for increased light, even an old comparison of light bulbs. http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache...ed+light&hl=en http://plasticulture.cas.psu.edu/DSuccess-mulch.htm http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/art...?artid=1062077 http://www.ccpo.odu.edu/SEES/veget/class/Chap_3/3_1.htm http://www.thekrib.com/Lights/intensity.html My sun room uses transluscent insulation under a clear roof, unshaded windows. I've considered adding mirrors or foil against the back wall to try to limit the shadowed places and balance the development of plants. The plants are outside during the summer and get good light coverage from most directions, but the blooms concentrate on the the sunny side of the plant during the winter. In the southeast area of the room the blooms on the cattleyas develop in all directions around the plant. Someone that uses supplemental light may try using bulbs with enhanced spectrum designs or colored reflectors and filters to increase different light bands in the spectrum. Orchids take such a long time, even a single bloom season. There may be more in the color of the floor and encouraged reflection of the walls than most people have given credit in their pursuit of light. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Red mulch under tomato plants will increase yield, could colour of
benches, shade cloth and walls help our orchids? I have painted surfaces white for total light intensity but could there be a colour that would be an improvement? Don S.W. Ontario |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Doesn't that raise the question about what the red pigmentation does
(assuming all other mulch properties are identical)? Is it the reflected red light back to the plant that makes a difference or is it a change in the ground temperature under it? -- Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com Plants, Supplies, Artwork, Books and Lots of Free Info! "Don" wrote in message ... Red mulch under tomato plants will increase yield, could colour of benches, shade cloth and walls help our orchids? I have painted surfaces white for total light intensity but could there be a colour that would be an improvement? Don S.W. Ontario |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"Ray" wrote in message ... Doesn't that raise the question about what the red pigmentation does (assuming all other mulch properties are identical)? Is it the reflected red light back to the plant that makes a difference or is it a change in the ground temperature under it? Yes. ;-) Both are likely to be happening. Any red light reflected onto a leaf will likely contribute to photosynthesis, and possibly other processes. It is certain that any light absorbed by the ground will be converted into heat, producing nonlinear changes in soil temperature with depth. Now understanding that process is considerably more complicated, involving conduction and transport of heat, but the salient point is that light hitting the soil will raise the temperature of the top layers of the soil, and that will have the usual effect on reaction rates in the plant's roots. How significant each process is is a different matter that can really only be determined experimentally. I know the agriculturalists I know talkof the importance of soil temperature, but I personally have not heard them discuss the colour of the ground. Cheers, Ted |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Ted Byers wrote:
"Ray" wrote in message ... Doesn't that raise the question about what the red pigmentation does (assuming all other mulch properties are identical)? Is it the reflected red light back to the plant that makes a difference or is it a change in the ground temperature under it? Yes. ;-) Both are likely to be happening. Any red light reflected onto a leaf will likely contribute to photosynthesis, and possibly other processes. It is certain that any light absorbed by the ground will be converted into heat, producing nonlinear changes in soil temperature with depth. Now understanding that process is considerably more complicated, involving conduction and transport of heat, but the salient point is that light hitting the soil will raise the temperature of the top layers of the soil, and that will have the usual effect on reaction rates in the plant's roots. How significant each process is is a different matter that can really only be determined experimentally. I know the agriculturalists I know talkof the importance of soil temperature, but I personally have not heard them discuss the colour of the ground. Cheers, Ted The following is copied and pasted here from the Lee Valley site - www.leevalley.com . Do orchids have this phytochrome, the colour sensitive protein the stimulates rapid growth? Don Super Red Mulch Super Red Mulch - Gardening From time to time research comes up with some astounding results. This is one of them. When this red plastic mulch is put on the soil under tomatoes, it will increase yields by up to 20% over black mulch, and makes the fruit set earlier. It works by reflecting a certain spectrum of light back to the plants, which in turn triggers the release of phytochrome, a color-sensitive protein that stimulates rapid growth and development. The research was done by a number of universities and our own tests proved it accurate. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Black shadecloth definitely blocks more light than does white. There may be
some "quality" reduction on a 1-1 basis, but it would take at least 2 [and I'm afraid maybe more] similarly-rated layers of white to provide the shade of 73% black [what we started with, for phals, and had to add more shade to, here in So. Fla.] Second-hand: Aluminet has a number of customers buying its red and gray products, or so they told me when they were here trying to sell me ... Not so much orchid growers, mostly growers of flowering terrestrials. According to Aluminet, these big growers move blocks of plants under different colors of shade to time their flowering. FWIW. Kenni "blass" wrote in message ... I found a site (http://tinyurl.com/8znl8) selling shade nets. And this is what they have to say or warn (darn, why now?) before buying their shade nets: *-Caution- Green and black shade nets behave like filters. Essential radiation for photosynthesis is reduced. Thus, the growth is reduced. A green and black shade net decreases the light's quantity and spectrum quality. White shade nets : They decrease only light's quantity, without altering luminous' spectrum quality. As a consequence, the plant's growth is faster with a white shade net.* -- blass |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Black or green shade net?
On Wednesday, October 5, 2005 at 2:37:15 PM UTC-7, Ray wrote:
OK, I give up. In shade cloth, the solid material blocks the light, and the openings let it pass, right? As an opening is an opening is an opening, what difference does it make what color the light-blocking part is? -- Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com Plants, Supplies, Artwork, Books and Lots of Free Info! "Kenni Judd" wrote in message ... Aluminet comes in a variety of colors. I know they have red, not sure about blue. -- Kenni Judd Juno Beach Orchids http://www.jborchids.com And on that thought, are there places that sell red/blue shade netting? :-). -- Chris Dukes Suspicion breeds confidence -- Brazil Ray..you know about Rays much |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Is there an issue with individual.net (news.individual.net or mid.individual.net)? | United Kingdom | |||
Marty Wallace email [email protected], [email protected] wastes anastonishing amount of time staking/harassing people by phone & email FROMverve energy Muja Power Station and | Australia | |||
Marty Wallace email [email protected], [email protected] wastes anastonishing amount of time staking/harassing peopleby phone & email FROM verveenergy Options | Australia | |||
5 days left to send papers to CSCC 2004 Invitation. [email protected] Is the W SEAS World | Plant Biology | |||
Shade shade shade | United Kingdom |