Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
illegal orchids or orchid smuggling.....
jamiemtl wrote:
Tennis, Yes I'm familiar with the face to name Kovach's discovery. Actually after some careful research it appears the guy who "ratted" out Kovach also was responsible for the demise of George Norris as well...interesting enough. The only information I've been able to find about someone actually trying to make big bucks from illegal smuggling was Harto Kolopaking. This was a dissapointment as I wanted to base my paper on underground crime rings of orchid smugglers. Instead what I've ended up doing is talking about the differences between what the media says and what the orchid commuity says.. Well, you got the one 'ring' that was caught. Any others are still underground.... such is the nature of crime, no? K |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
illegal orchids or orchid smuggling.....
I bought a flask of the Paph vietnamense sold by Antec. They provided me
with a receipt just like they do with any other Paph. There was no other paper work that came with the flask. The only assurance I have that the plants were propagated and sold with the blessing of the US and Vietnamese governments was Antec's posted word on their website. Of course, I believed them. I think the story of how they came to propagate and sell them legally in the US is still documented on their website. Despite my belief in Antec's veracity, I checked with a friend of mine who works for CITES in the capacity of "Chief, Division of Scientific Authority", (lets call him CITES DUDE and imagine him to be very much like Captain America after consuming a can of Popeye's magical spinach) and he confirmed they were aware of what antec was doing and it was legal. I contacted him to ask about *re-selling* them and what I needed to provide to people who bought them from me. When I re-sell these paphs to people in my country (the US) I only need to provide a receipt just like I do with all my plants. There is no special documentation required. I am usually asked, by the customer, to send a copy along of Antec's receipt as proof that I got them from Antec but this requirement of a forward propagating paper trail is internet lore. If you stop to think about it, a copy of my receipt from Antec does not *prove* that the plants I am selling came from Antec. The copy machine does not know how many plants came out of the flask. It does not know if I am the owner of the original receipt I am copying. I was told by CITES DUDE the following (and this is hard to quote without getting confusing, so I am going to paraphrase except for the words in actual quotes): if the customer wishes and I was agreeable I could provide them a statement that "these are legal plants derived from the Plant Rescue Center Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service" or something like that. Strangely, even this does not seem to be required. I was told *If the customer wishes and I am agreeable*.... It seems CITES is sensitive to the fact that I might not want to tell my customers where I get my plants for purely economic reasons. Why buy them from me at the prices I am charging if you can go to my source? Everybody is a middleman... However, I did not mind sharing with my customers that the plants I was selling came from an Antec flask. I actually printed it on the plant tag, for whatever that was worth.... Occasionally I did get a little tense when they wanted me to go make a copy of my receipt. If only because it is non-proof and protects neither them or me from anything the government might do if it suspected somebody is breaking the law. So for the average customer, a receipt is all that is necessary and required. However I was told by CITES DUDE that a statement of origin was (and this is CITES DUDE verbatim now) "most critical to anyone who thinks they might want to export the plants they got from you, or propagate them and export their progeny. They'll need to get CITES export documents from us, and we'll ask about the origin of the plants. Beyond that, it is likely to become an issue only if someone has raised suspicions that they are dealing in (buying or selling) illegal plants." For what it's worth I believe there is no real way to track individual plants bought and sold and grown within our borders. If you are dealing with importers and exports of orchids you should check them for shady qualities, if only for your own peace of mind. Don't buy something you believe you shouldn't have no matter how badly you want it. If you are breaking the import/export laws, you will eventually raise suspicions. The CITES DUDE I am referring to is an orchid collector himself. He is an active member of our local society and knows all the vendors in the area. "Ted Byers" wrote in message .. . Andrew, I expect that most here are as interested in conservation as anyone else active in conservation. Your solution, while commendable, is inadequate for the obective of ensuring continued survival of orchids in the wild. You need a more comprehensive system. First, as you say, there is a need, in each country, for commercial growers who have proper documentation proving that even when they sell species, the plants sold are the product of a breeding program, and that who ensure that they have al the requisite CITES documentation in place. They'd also have to ensure that they supply the proper documentation to their customers so that they and/or their customers can use the plants in their own breeding programs and maintain the option of exporting their plants too. Second, there is an urgent need to conserve habitat, and to design sampling regimes that protect the species. For example, for species that can be produced by cloning, sample only the meristem tissue for use in producing clones that in turn can be used for breeding. And for genera such as the catts, sample only a number of back bulbs from specimens that are large enough to spare them, and then use the back bulbs to propagate the plants by whatever means. With some plants, the only option would be to self specimen plants, or cross neighboring planst of the same species/variety, and then come back later to harvest the seeds (and this only with plants that have many more than one flower so that natural propagation can occur too). With the availability of portable GPS technology and hand-held computers, it should be trivially easy to map orchid habitat so that those protecting the habitat can easily find specimens they have found previously. Third, it must be turned into an industry that people living in or near the habitat that is to be protected can earn a living supporting the orchid industry while concommitantly protecting the habitat. I'd expect that if the local residents have a vested interest in protecting both the orchids and their habitat, they'd help in such conservation efforts. Conservation organisations have only two general options in this regard; they can help improve the situation of the people living in or near the areas to be protected, and work with them, or they can try to maintain a running battle with them to the end of either fighting a losing battle or exterminating the local residents (something I regard as reprehensible). No matter how much I value orchids or the habitat in which they live, I value people more. My impression of many environmental activists here is that they have little regard for the people living in areas they want to protect, often describing them in terms one would use to describe mortal enemies. Your option of producing so many orchids that there is little incentive to deal in illegal orchids is a good one. However, unless embedded in a broader system that includes enabling the trade in orchids (and indeed other exotic organisms) in a manner that is consistent with, and supports the objectives of CITES, as well as having as the top priority the objective of meeting the needs of, and improving the living standards of, the people living next door to the orchids we want to protect, it can not ultimately acheive the objective of protecting wild orchids, And you may want to lighten up a bit. For the vast majority of people, their only option for supporting orchid conservation in particular, and conservation in general, is to support, by buying plants from, vendors who are involved in conservation and by joining those societies they can find that are involved in conservation, not to mention lobbying politicians to support conservation initiatives. Most orchid "consumers" will lack both the means and the expertise required to get conservation done right. Cheers, Ted -- R.E. (Ted) Byers, Ph.D., Ed.D. R & D Decision Support Solutions http://www.randddecisionsupportsolutions.com/ Healthy Living Through Informed Decision Making |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
illegal orchids or orchid smuggling.....
Al
I have no argument with anything you said. CITES is an issue primarily for importers and exporters. But I recall cases where vendors couldn't get their plants across the border when they visited an orchid society here as a guest speaker. That was a major disappointment because they had some very interesting plants. And I can see it as a potential problem for collectors in one country wanting to take plants to shows in another country. I'd expect that if I, as a Canadian collector and not a vendor, wanted to attend an orchid show in New York, CITES could be an issue for me if the plants I wanted to show, or have judged, we subect to CITES restrictions. At the last orchid society meeting I attended, several breeders, in discussing the impact of CITES on their business, noted both that the Canadian officials seemed to want documentary proof that vendors needed to be able to prove that the parent plants of a given cross are legal (if they're species protected by CITES), and that they were not provided with documentation proving the legality of the seedlings they'd bought from which they wanted to select breeding stock. They were worried that they'd not be able to prove that the breeding stock they'd bought from a vendor that imported the plants into Canada originally was legal. For me it isn't an issue since I have no plans on taking any of my plants across any border any time soon. When I referred to documentation, I was thinking only of collectors who may need to take some of their plants across a border for whatever reason, and commercial operations that may be involved directly or indirectly in international trade. Cheers, Ted -- R.E. (Ted) Byers, Ph.D., Ed.D. R & D Decision Support Solutions http://www.randddecisionsupportsolutions.com/ Healthy Living Through Informed Decision Making |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
illegal orchids or orchid smuggling.....
Plants crossing a border is where problems begin. I understand and
sympathize with those who must cross borders. I choose not to because I don't have the energy to deal with most forms of bureaucracy. I own several plants I see listed on CITES Appendix I and they were all bought from vendors inside this country. Finding Renanthera imshootiana on the CITES APPENDIX I list surprised me an did finding Peristeria elata. I bought my Peristeria elata from the US Botanical Gardens when they had a vendor stand at the NCOS annual show/sale one year. Apparently there was some reason that they should not have been selling plants (divided from back bulb divisions) and I don't remember what these reasons were specifically, but they have never sold plants at the show again. Too bad too. You have to know that at this show I got a receipt with a price and tax total that did not include what was bought AND it is from the NCOS, not the vendor who sold the plant. The receipt is just a cash register receipt and does not even have the NCOS's name on it. I have it in a file with every receipt of plants I bought that year. Peristeria elata (alata, whatever) is a weed. It is probably on the CITES APPENDIX I list because it is the national flower of Panama and very showy so they don't want collectors pulling it up and carrying it home. I would bet it is not on this list because it is "endangered" in the sense that there is only a handful left in it's native habitat, but I don't know. The is probably clear to everybody, but I wanna say it anyway: *The country whose borders encircle the plant in question make the decision to label it endangered, not CITES.* For instance, no company, non-profit or otherwise, no agency or individual can do anything with Phrag kovachii, it's seeds or tissue, until the government of Peru says they can. CITES officials can only enforce Peru's wishes. Most of the problems at borders come from customs agents and individuals who are not clear about what permissions are needed for the plant material in question. For this reason alone, I would not want to play import/export with my orchids. Anyway, the capsule I made (a selfing of the Peristeria elata) exploded in my greenhouse and baby plants were coming up in everything for several years. It *is* a weed. I have sold quite a few via the internet and from my greenhouse all to people within the US border but I could never provide proof of origin that went back furthur than a sketchy claim that I bought the mother plant from the US government via my local orchid society. This has always worried me. I can not even imagine what problems if any I would have if I tried to export these plants. Actually I can imagine the problems and no amount of money is worth it, so I just don't do import or export. There are enough orchids in my county already to make me happy. I hope the same is true in all your countries where ever you are. Mostly I have never imported plants with my permit because the first step is usually to wire money to a foreign bank account belonging to somebody I have never met. This is scary enough to stop me from using the general permit and to rely on plants obtainable from within my own borders only. I would really like to possess a Phrag kovachii and one day I will. I expect I will buy it from somebody inside this country, probably in flask from the likes of Chuck Acker or Antec, when the price is being driven by normal market factors and not by "first to own" economics. If I ever traveled to a foreign country I would go with an orchid tour group where part of the package included somebody to deal with permits and border crossing. I suspect I would still be very nervous about spending money on things that might not make it past Customs. Cleary the triptophan has not taken effect yet, I'm still typing madly.... "Ted Byers" wrote in message ... Al I have no argument with anything you said. CITES is an issue primarily for importers and exporters. But I recall cases where vendors couldn't get their plants across the border when they visited an orchid society here as a guest speaker. That was a major disappointment because they had some very interesting plants. And I can see it as a potential problem for collectors in one country wanting to take plants to shows in another country. I'd expect that if I, as a Canadian collector and not a vendor, wanted to attend an orchid show in New York, CITES could be an issue for me if the plants I wanted to show, or have judged, we subect to CITES restrictions. At the last orchid society meeting I attended, several breeders, in discussing the impact of CITES on their business, noted both that the Canadian officials seemed to want documentary proof that vendors needed to be able to prove that the parent plants of a given cross are legal (if they're species protected by CITES), and that they were not provided with documentation proving the legality of the seedlings they'd bought from which they wanted to select breeding stock. They were worried that they'd not be able to prove that the breeding stock they'd bought from a vendor that imported the plants into Canada originally was legal. For me it isn't an issue since I have no plans on taking any of my plants across any border any time soon. When I referred to documentation, I was thinking only of collectors who may need to take some of their plants across a border for whatever reason, and commercial operations that may be involved directly or indirectly in international trade. Cheers, Ted -- R.E. (Ted) Byers, Ph.D., Ed.D. R & D Decision Support Solutions http://www.randddecisionsupportsolutions.com/ Healthy Living Through Informed Decision Making |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
illegal orchids or orchid smuggling.....
----- Original Message ----- From: "K Barrett" Newsgroups: rec.gardens.orchids Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 11:33 AM Subject: illegal orchids or orchid smuggling..... Well, you got the one 'ring' that was caught. Any others are still underground.... such is the nature of crime, no? K -- the reporter gone? -- So I'm at a big orchid show and my storage area is next to a Taiwanese grower's area. All of their plants have been imported for the show, coffin box after coffin box stacked toward the ceiling. In English, in big black marker the side of each box lists it contents, 100 of this 25 of that. When I see the boxes containing flasks names as vietnamense and hangianum make up the this and that. Through Taiwan CITES, through US customs, through US ag inspection, half way around the world with nothing to hide. The plants at the show did not surprise me, nothing new there. But written on the side of the boxes -- underground? Like most shows, by the Sunday afternoon all of the flasks have been sold -- such is the nature of this crime. So last weekend I'm at a smaller AOS judged show. As is my normal routine, after my exhibit is up I check the other exhibits before the ribbon shake and break occurs. In another commercial growers exhibit is a spectacular Paph labeled as Joyce Hasegawa. I am no Paph expert, but delenatii has never made anything this nice. Clearly the plant is vietnamense X hangianum. I confirm this with a Paph expert who says 'no doubt.' That night or maybe the next day, the AOS judging fairies come and by the time I return to the show it is ribbons ribbons everywhere. Joyce proudly sports a best in class blue. I am not even sure where the crime is. Now some good new, Phrag. kovachii. The first (at least that I know of) batch of legal kovachii arrived in the US last summer. I know of another legal batch, from another breeder, that has completed the Peru CITES paperwork and will be in the US before Christmas. I do not think there will be any problem with the legal status of plants from either of these batches since the Peruvian government gave the plants to these growers in Peru. The orchid world has followed the progress of these plants and the pods, it is all documented. In addition, it is my understanding that the surviving plants handed out by Peruvian government have been DNA fingerprinted. I was surprised to see Peru allowed the flasks to leave the country, but it seems they did. All and all, when we get past Mike and Selby's problems, CITES seems to work well with kovachii. As legal plants become available the demand for collected plants should all but go away. I expect kovachii distribution to be very similar to what we saw with besseae. We are going to start seeing kovachii seedlings for sale (if they are not already) in the three figure range. Over the next couple of years the supply will continue to increase and the price will drop. I hope to have one within 5 years and I plan to pay less than $50 for it. Pat |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
illegal orchids or orchid smuggling.....
if everybody follows that routine, and walks away from the triple digit
numbers, we can all have one for less than 50 in just two years. Al "Pat Brennan" wrote in message ... We are going to start seeing kovachii seedlings for sale (if they are not already) in the three figure range. Over the next couple of years the supply will continue to increase and the price will drop. I hope to have one within 5 years and I plan to pay less than $50 for it. Pat |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
illegal orchids or orchid smuggling.....
Indeed! I can wait, too.
K Barrett Al wrote: if everybody follows that routine, and walks away from the triple digit numbers, we can all have one for less than 50 in just two years. Al "Pat Brennan" wrote in message ... We are going to start seeing kovachii seedlings for sale (if they are not already) in the three figure range. Over the next couple of years the supply will continue to increase and the price will drop. I hope to have one within 5 years and I plan to pay less than $50 for it. Pat |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
illegal orchids or orchid smuggling.....
Pat Brennan wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "K Barrett" Newsgroups: rec.gardens.orchids Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 11:33 AM Subject: illegal orchids or orchid smuggling..... Well, you got the one 'ring' that was caught. Any others are still underground.... such is the nature of crime, no? K -- the reporter gone? -- So I'm at a big orchid show and my storage area is next to a Taiwanese grower's area. All of their plants have been imported for the show, coffin box after coffin box stacked toward the ceiling. In English, in big black marker the side of each box lists it contents, 100 of this 25 of that. When I see the boxes containing flasks names as vietnamense and hangianum make up the this and that. Through Taiwan CITES, through US customs, through US ag inspection, half way around the world with nothing to hide. The plants at the show did not surprise me, nothing new there. But written on the side of the boxes -- underground? Like most shows, by the Sunday afternoon all of the flasks have been sold -- such is the nature of this crime. So last weekend I'm at a smaller AOS judged show. As is my normal routine, after my exhibit is up I check the other exhibits before the ribbon shake and break occurs. In another commercial growers exhibit is a spectacular Paph labeled as Joyce Hasegawa. I am no Paph expert, but delenatii has never made anything this nice. Clearly the plant is vietnamense X hangianum. I confirm this with a Paph expert who says 'no doubt.' That night or maybe the next day, the AOS judging fairies come and by the time I return to the show it is ribbons ribbons everywhere. Joyce proudly sports a best in class blue. I am not even sure where the crime is. Now some good new, Phrag. kovachii. The first (at least that I know of) batch of legal kovachii arrived in the US last summer. I know of another legal batch, from another breeder, that has completed the Peru CITES paperwork and will be in the US before Christmas. I do not think there will be any problem with the legal status of plants from either of these batches since the Peruvian government gave the plants to these growers in Peru. The orchid world has followed the progress of these plants and the pods, it is all documented. In addition, it is my understanding that the surviving plants handed out by Peruvian government have been DNA fingerprinted. I was surprised to see Peru allowed the flasks to leave the country, but it seems they did. All and all, when we get past Mike and Selby's problems, CITES seems to work well with kovachii. As legal plants become available the demand for collected plants should all but go away. I expect kovachii distribution to be very similar to what we saw with besseae. We are going to start seeing kovachii seedlings for sale (if they are not already) in the three figure range. Over the next couple of years the supply will continue to increase and the price will drop. I hope to have one within 5 years and I plan to pay less than $50 for it. Pat Your observation about the Joyce Hasegawa is why Harold Koopowitz gave an address to the trustees in Sonoma. That judges have to start being more observant. That plants like your Joyce Hasegawa reference will start showing up at the judging table and judges should be aware that if its too good to be true its probably made with illegal stock. I didn't hear his comments. They were made to the Trustees committee. But I believe they are repeated in this most recent Orchid Digest magazine. (Or was it this most recent 'Orchids'? [scratches head]) I am floored that hagianum etc came throuogh in flasks. Maybe because they *were* in flasks? Note: I don't believe CITES exempts App I flasks, no matter what has been written, but sheesh, you've seen it for yourself, Pat.... maybe its true. So what's the deal then? The Taiwanese vendor imported hangianum legally. In a few years these flask's plants will show up at the judging table. We aren't supposed to judge them..... but by then who knows? The AOS's ban may be lifted by that time. (Note to self: start hanging arond with paph people now so I learn what these things look like for when the ban is lifted....) K Barrett |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
illegal orchids or orchid smuggling.....
Shifting gears a bit, I wanted to say that--as far as bureaucracy
goes--the importing and exporting controls established by CITES are fairly easy to learn and understand. For example, a broad class of orchid exports and imports are expressly prohibited. And for those that are allowed, the paperwork required is straightforward. Finally, for exceptional cases, there are application procedures for importing even a prohibited item provided one has a suitable (e.g. academic, scientific) purpose. While the lay person might misunderstand or try to get around the requirements due to lack of knowledge, resources, or planning, the professional orchid vendor has no similar excuse. The CITES regs are pretty basic compared, say, to the international trade of integrated circuit design software that can be used to produce items listed on the US munitions list. I spent 7 years in charge of import/export for just such a company and I can tell you that CITES is at least simple to follow. Smuggling will always go on, but there is probably more money (meaning total, not per plant) to be made via legitimate means. And the downside of being prosecuted for smuggling is a very big risk for those that would ignore CITES. When I did import-export, I routinely took classes (not expensive) given by the US Bureau of Export Administration and they made even complex situations fairly easy to decode. Also, BXA reps were willing to take your case free of charge, research it, and give you an answer regarding how to import/export your particular item. They were really helpful. From the CITES research I've done, the working method seems to be a) make sure your plants are from a nursery and not wild collected, b) identify them properly via full name and with identifying photos to speed then through, c) have your CITES paperwork correct and accompanying the shipment, d) make sure they're bare root or otherwise obviously without bugs so they aren't stopped and fumigated. That's not as easy as shipping cookies to grandma, but in the world of import-export it's not the worst. -M |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
illegal orchids or orchid smuggling.....
Eric Hunt wrote:
As you can imagine, that means all newly described species must be described from within the borders of the country they are discovered in before they can be exported to the rest of the world. This establisheds a need for extant botanical authority there, not a given, and may prevent plants from being described at all. This mess has also caused some large botanical institutions in the USA to completely stop all plant research outside of the USA. They saw what happened to Selby and are afraid it could happen to them. What I feared and predicted would come to pass when the CITES nazis and US court decided botanists must now also be police. |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
illegal orchids or orchid smuggling.....
Probably, on this first one. But if the person who went to all the effort
and expense to do it doesn't get some big payoffs on the initial 3-digit offerings, he or she will be less likely to do it again. Kenni "Al" wrote in message ... if everybody follows that routine, and walks away from the triple digit numbers, we can all have one for less than 50 in just two years. Al "Pat Brennan" wrote in message ... We are going to start seeing kovachii seedlings for sale (if they are not already) in the three figure range. Over the next couple of years the supply will continue to increase and the price will drop. I hope to have one within 5 years and I plan to pay less than $50 for it. Pat |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
illegal orchids or orchid smuggling.....
K Barrett spaketh thusly:
I am floored that hagianum etc came through in flasks. Maybe because they *were* in flasks? Note: I don't believe CITES exempts App I flasks, no matter what has been written, but sheesh, you've seen it for yourself, Pat.... maybe its true Orchids on Appendix I and II of CITES are specifically exempted under CITES. It's there in the treaty, right there on www.cites.org if you're so incined. The problem comes with plants whose parentage is under question for legal purposes, an interpretation the US Office of Management Authority shares with a small number of other countries. As a result, Paph. vietnamense from Asia is "probably illegal," while containers from Europe may or may not be legitimate, according to my conversations with the harried folks at Fish and Wildlife. Perhaps this status has changed recently; it's difficult to keep up with this sort of thing when the rules aren't exactly written down. That Appendix I plants are specifically exempted under CITES has a long background, including lobbying on the part of the American Orchid Society way the heck back when (early 1970's, I think). Bob Wellenstein, who once boasted in this newsgroup (if memory serves) that he propagates more Appendix I species than maybe anyone else in the United States refers to the exemption in his web pages: http://www.ladyslipper.com/paphfaq.htm "Flasks have been exempted from CITES documentation. However, it is important to note that flasks derived from illegal plants are also considered illegal. It is also important to note that the concept being promoted by some of the plant smugglers that once a plant has entered the country, even if illegally, is now legal to possess is incorrect." This may become pertinent to the kovachii situation if the ultimate source of the propagules is ever determined to be outside of Peru, which seems possible. The address in the header isn't valid. Send no email there. -AJHicks Chandler, AZ |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
illegal orchids or orchid smuggling.....
So the question is if the plant was legal in the country of origin or
if it is legal in the US. Can tissue be collected from wild orchids that are in their "natural" habitat and be brought in? Or is that only under the expetion for scientific & acidemic? Jack |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
illegal orchids or orchid smuggling.....
Aaron Hicks wrote:
K Barrett spaketh thusly: I am floored that hagianum etc came through in flasks. Maybe because they *were* in flasks? Note: I don't believe CITES exempts App I flasks, no matter what has been written, but sheesh, you've seen it for yourself, Pat.... maybe its true Orchids on Appendix I and II of CITES are specifically exempted under CITES. It's there in the treaty, right there on www.cites.org if you're so incined. The problem comes with plants whose parentage is under question for legal purposes, an interpretation the US Office of Management Authority shares with a small number of other countries. As a result, Paph. vietnamense from Asia is "probably illegal," while containers from Europe may or may not be legitimate, according to my conversations with the harried folks at Fish and Wildlife. Perhaps this status has changed recently; it's difficult to keep up with this sort of thing when the rules aren't exactly written down. That Appendix I plants are specifically exempted under CITES has a long background, including lobbying on the part of the American Orchid Society way the heck back when (early 1970's, I think). Bob Wellenstein, who once boasted in this newsgroup (if memory serves) that he propagates more Appendix I species than maybe anyone else in the United States refers to the exemption in his web pages: http://www.ladyslipper.com/paphfaq.htm "Flasks have been exempted from CITES documentation. However, it is important to note that flasks derived from illegal plants are also considered illegal. It is also important to note that the concept being promoted by some of the plant smugglers that once a plant has entered the country, even if illegally, is now legal to possess is incorrect." This may become pertinent to the kovachii situation if the ultimate source of the propagules is ever determined to be outside of Peru, which seems possible. The address in the header isn't valid. Send no email there. -AJHicks Chandler, AZ This is when I stopped reading and talking about CITES. It just too unwritten and dependant on whoever's interpretation. As I once said if I had spent as much time on my 401(k) portfolio as I spent reading CITES.org I'd be rich right now. (George Norris told me that was the most intelligent thing I'd ever said.) K Barrett |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
illegal orchids or orchid smuggling.....
Sterile seed and tissue cultures are exempt. But you have to be skilled
to grow those into orchids. From http://www.cites.org/eng/app/appendices.shtml : "For all of the following Appendix-I species, seedling or tissue cultures obtained in vitro, in solid or liquid media, transported in sterile containers are not subject to the provisions of the Convention" Appendix I are the rare ones--even those threatened with extinction. Follow the link for a list of names. All phrag and phaphs are listed as Appendix I. Most people seem to run into trouble with plants of flowering size that are or appear wild-collected. Also, many people don't read CITES and don't know that many types of Orchids cannot be shipped internationally at all. At this point, the easiest orchids to ship internationally are hybrids of the genera Cymbidium, Dendrobium, Phalaenopsis and Vanda. They've become so common (i.e. grown in large numbers commercially) that these can now be shipped without much hassle. In fact they are exempt from CITES if the shipment meets specific requirements. (See footnote 8 on the above page--very informative!) -Munir |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More Orchid Smuggling | Orchids | |||
"A good illegal alien is a dead illegal alien". Cannot bedisputed. | Gardening | |||
That orchid smuggling thread..... | Orchids | |||
Orchid smuggling indictment | Orchids | |||
Orchid smuggling indictment | Orchids |