This flower is enormous!

http://forum.theorchidsource.com/cgi...;f=38;t=003263

Diana

Wow! That is amazingly huge. Very neat.
Joanna

"Diana Kulaga" wrote in message
...
This flower is enormous!

http://forum.theorchidsource.com/cgi...;f=38;t=003263

Diana

Diana Kulaga wrote:
This flower is enormous!

http://forum.theorchidsource.com/cgi...;f=38;t=003263

Diana



Don't you think that the next to the last picture shows evidence that
they dug up a plant? If they didn't dig it up, they pretty thoroughly
molested it!

Steve

Steve schreef:
Diana Kulaga wrote:

This flower is enormous!

http://forum.theorchidsource.com/cgi...;f=38;t=003263


Diana


Don't you think that the next to the last picture shows evidence that
they dug up a plant? If they didn't dig it up, they pretty thoroughly
molested it!

Steve

That is exactly my first thought when I saw that picture!

Niek

Good eyes, Gentlemen. I confess that I didn't pay as much attention to that
picture when I first went to the site. Having gone back for a second look, I
agree.

The other thing is: the person who sent me the link in the first place now
thinks it's a Phrag. I grow very few Paphs and no Phrags, so I won't try to
comment. What do you think?

Diana

On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:16:10 -0500 in Diana Kulaga wrote:
Good eyes, Gentlemen. I confess that I didn't pay as much attention to that
picture when I first went to the site. Having gone back for a second look, I
agree.

The other thing is: the person who sent me the link in the first place now
thinks it's a Phrag. I grow very few Paphs and no Phrags, so I won't try to
comment. What do you think?

I thought the pouchers of the americas were phrags and cyprediums.


--
Chris Dukes
Suspicion breeds confidence -- Brazil

These are Phragmipediums.
-danny

"Diana Kulaga" wrote in message
...
Good eyes, Gentlemen. I confess that I didn't pay as much attention to
that picture when I first went to the site. Having gone back for a second
look, I agree.

The other thing is: the person who sent me the link in the first place now
thinks it's a Phrag. I grow very few Paphs and no Phrags, so I won't try
to comment. What do you think?

Diana

Diana Kulaga wrote:
...........
.........................
The other thing is: the person who sent me the link in the first place now
thinks it's a Phrag.

Oh, it's a Phrag all right. I didn't even notice that you had written
Paph until now. The name kovachii is so infamous at this point that it
only takes a glance at that name to know what plant we are talking about.

Steve