Marilyn Light (North American chair of the Orchid Specialist Group) used to
give OrchidSafari chats on the idea of orchid conservation vis a vis
hobbyist's orchid collections. Or to put it another way, since habitat is
being lost our collections just may wind up housing important plants, maybe
even one's no longer found in the wild. You may or may not agree with that
idea but one of the things Marilyn used to stress was to keep and maintain a
list of all your orchids, hybrids included, because some just might become
important.

Lo and behold, my mentor did keep a list of her orchids. More importantly
she *maintained* the list! Dang, she even input purchases made just a few
days before she died. (The woman was compulsive, *G*.) I can't tell you
how easy it has been for her family to figure out what's in the GH. It only
took a day to figure out what's still extant in her collection. Way more
easy than the daunting task of cataloging what's in her library and potting
shed.

So, while Marilyn Light might have had some lofty goal, thinking that a list
of what's in the GH could conserve orchids in the wild, in reality its made
one facet of my mentor's heir's lives real easy. People here have mentioned
their orchid databases, some that even include flowering records. *Kudos to
you all!* I never really was 'together' enough to make a list of my
orchids, much less keep it current but now I'm considering it and including
my library's books, too. I figure my heirs deserve a clue as to what's
worthwhile in all the crap they may want to dump or sell on eBay.

K Barrett

K: that's a purpose few like to consider, which is unfortunate, because
sooner or later, it will happen to all of us ...

We get several calls a year, from folks seeking to sell such collections
after the actual grower has passed on. If they had that type of inventory
listing to send out, they'd generate a lot more interest.

The other issue, of course, is prompt action, which it sounds like it's also
happening in your case. Without the grower or someone taking at least
minimal care, the value can decrease rapidly. Kudos to Marilyn. Kenni

"K Barrett" wrote in message
. ..
Marilyn Light (North American chair of the Orchid Specialist Group) used
to give OrchidSafari chats on the idea of orchid conservation vis a vis
hobbyist's orchid collections. SNIP Lo and behold, my mentor did keep a
list of her orchids. More importantly she *maintained* the list! Dang,
she even input purchases made just a few days before she died. (The woman
was compulsive, *G*.) I can't tell you how easy it has been for her
family to figure out what's in the GH. It only took a day to figure out
what's still extant in her collection. Way more easy than the daunting
task of cataloging what's in her library and potting shed.

So, while Marilyn Light might have had some lofty goal, thinking that a
list of what's in the GH could conserve orchids in the wild, in reality
its made one facet of my mentor's heir's lives real easy. SNIP

Okay, you have laid on the guilt, Kathy. I used to have an up to date list,
complete with hyperlinks. It went away. I'll do it again. Promise. Right
after I get done repotting.....

All joking aside, you've put forth a very good reason for having
comprehensive records, and you kind of lit a fire under my butt.

Diana

"Kenni Judd" wrote in message
. ..
K: that's a purpose few like to consider, which is unfortunate, because
sooner or later, it will happen to all of us ...

We get several calls a year, from folks seeking to sell such collections
after the actual grower has passed on. If they had that type of inventory
listing to send out, they'd generate a lot more interest.

The other issue, of course, is prompt action, which it sounds like it's
also happening in your case. Without the grower or someone taking at
least minimal care, the value can decrease rapidly. Kudos to Marilyn.
Kenni

"K Barrett" wrote in message
. ..
Marilyn Light (North American chair of the Orchid Specialist Group) used
to give OrchidSafari chats on the idea of orchid conservation vis a vis
hobbyist's orchid collections. SNIP Lo and behold, my mentor did keep
a list of her orchids. More importantly she *maintained* the list! Dang,
she even input purchases made just a few days before she died. (The
woman was compulsive, *G*.) I can't tell you how easy it has been for
her family to figure out what's in the GH. It only took a day to figure
out what's still extant in her collection. Way more easy than the
daunting task of cataloging what's in her library and potting shed.

So, while Marilyn Light might have had some lofty goal, thinking that a
list of what's in the GH could conserve orchids in the wild, in reality
its made one facet of my mentor's heir's lives real easy. SNIP

No guilt intended, Diana. Just be sure to keep the laptop dry in teh gh (or
inyour case the lanai. Actually I can see you out there sipping sweet tea
and typing away on the computer (long extention cord) while your husband
does the hard work of digging the labels out of the pots.

K
"Diana Kulaga" wrote in message
.. .
Okay, you have laid on the guilt, Kathy. I used to have an up to date
list, complete with hyperlinks. It went away. I'll do it again. Promise.
Right after I get done repotting.....

All joking aside, you've put forth a very good reason for having
comprehensive records, and you kind of lit a fire under my butt.

Diana

"Kenni Judd" wrote in message
. ..
K: that's a purpose few like to consider, which is unfortunate, because
sooner or later, it will happen to all of us ...

We get several calls a year, from folks seeking to sell such collections
after the actual grower has passed on. If they had that type of
inventory listing to send out, they'd generate a lot more interest.

The other issue, of course, is prompt action, which it sounds like it's
also happening in your case. Without the grower or someone taking at
least minimal care, the value can decrease rapidly. Kudos to Marilyn.
Kenni

"K Barrett" wrote in message
. ..
Marilyn Light (North American chair of the Orchid Specialist Group) used
to give OrchidSafari chats on the idea of orchid conservation vis a vis
hobbyist's orchid collections. SNIP Lo and behold, my mentor did keep
a list of her orchids. More importantly she *maintained* the list!
Dang, she even input purchases made just a few days before she died.
(The woman was compulsive, *G*.) I can't tell you how easy it has been
for her family to figure out what's in the GH. It only took a day to
figure out what's still extant in her collection. Way more easy than
the daunting task of cataloging what's in her library and potting shed.

So, while Marilyn Light might have had some lofty goal, thinking that a
list of what's in the GH could conserve orchids in the wild, in reality
its made one facet of my mentor's heir's lives real easy. SNIP

Kathy, there's another use as well as the unpleasant long term consideration. It
helps no end in tracking repotting & other treatment needs. I also try to
record *where* each plant is in my collection now. That's after searching &
swearing, trying to find a particular plant (or many) that my database says
should be repotted.

And, while I don't keep it all as up to date as I should, I do ensure that each
purchase, loss, repot, and position on shelf is recorded.

For repotting, I find it far easier to sort the database by repot date than to
work my way through the entire collection looking for the date of last repot on
each tag.


On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:50:55 -0700, "K Barrett" wrote:

Marilyn Light (North American chair of the Orchid Specialist Group) used to
give OrchidSafari chats on the idea of orchid conservation vis a vis
hobbyist's orchid collections. Or to put it another way, since habitat is
being lost our collections just may wind up housing important plants, maybe
even one's no longer found in the wild. You may or may not agree with that
idea but one of the things Marilyn used to stress was to keep and maintain a
list of all your orchids, hybrids included, because some just might become
important.

Lo and behold, my mentor did keep a list of her orchids. More importantly
she *maintained* the list! Dang, she even input purchases made just a few
days before she died. (The woman was compulsive, *G*.) I can't tell you
how easy it has been for her family to figure out what's in the GH. It only
took a day to figure out what's still extant in her collection. Way more
easy than the daunting task of cataloging what's in her library and potting
shed.

So, while Marilyn Light might have had some lofty goal, thinking that a list
of what's in the GH could conserve orchids in the wild, in reality its made
one facet of my mentor's heir's lives real easy. People here have mentioned
their orchid databases, some that even include flowering records. *Kudos to
you all!* I never really was 'together' enough to make a list of my
orchids, much less keep it current but now I'm considering it and including
my library's books, too. I figure my heirs deserve a clue as to what's
worthwhile in all the crap they may want to dump or sell on eBay.

K Barrett

Dave Gillingham
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To email me remove the .private from my email address.

i never planned on keeping track of the weeds--until a friend of mine
gave me a nice little blank book for xmas one year. i thought, "what
am i going to do with *this*?" and then said "ah ha..."

i note acqusition of the plant (name, nursery, brief description),
when it dies, or when i give it away, when it gets a registered name,
and if i win anything on it. (once, so far. repotting dates are on
plant tags in the pots.

however, i only have about 3 dozen plants, so it's all very casual.

but good points about the conservation issue....

--j_a

I wound up re-entering a lot of names just so I could search the database
easier. For example plants were listed as Blc, brassolaeliocattleya and
every spelling in between. A computer genius I'm not but I learned
consistency isn't a hobgoblin of small minds where databases are concerned,
*G*. I wish she had recorded when each plant exited out of the collection.
What initially looked like over 1000 plants on paper wound up being about
300 or so in real life. So far. We still have the outdoor plants to do.
But again, it should be easy to mark who's present and accounted for..

K Barrett

"Dave Gillingham" wrote in message
...
Kathy, there's another use as well as the unpleasant long term
consideration. It
helps no end in tracking repotting & other treatment needs. I also try to
record *where* each plant is in my collection now. That's after searching
&
swearing, trying to find a particular plant (or many) that my database
says
should be repotted.

And, while I don't keep it all as up to date as I should, I do ensure that
each
purchase, loss, repot, and position on shelf is recorded.

For repotting, I find it far easier to sort the database by repot date
than to
work my way through the entire collection looking for the date of last
repot on
each tag.


On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:50:55 -0700, "K Barrett"
wrote:

Marilyn Light (North American chair of the Orchid Specialist Group) used
to
give OrchidSafari chats on the idea of orchid conservation vis a vis
hobbyist's orchid collections. Or to put it another way, since habitat is
being lost our collections just may wind up housing important plants,
maybe
even one's no longer found in the wild. You may or may not agree with
that
idea but one of the things Marilyn used to stress was to keep and maintain
a
list of all your orchids, hybrids included, because some just might become
important.

Lo and behold, my mentor did keep a list of her orchids. More importantly
she *maintained* the list! Dang, she even input purchases made just a few
days before she died. (The woman was compulsive, *G*.) I can't tell you
how easy it has been for her family to figure out what's in the GH. It
only
took a day to figure out what's still extant in her collection. Way more
easy than the daunting task of cataloging what's in her library and
potting
shed.

So, while Marilyn Light might have had some lofty goal, thinking that a
list
of what's in the GH could conserve orchids in the wild, in reality its
made
one facet of my mentor's heir's lives real easy. People here have
mentioned
their orchid databases, some that even include flowering records. *Kudos
to
you all!* I never really was 'together' enough to make a list of my
orchids, much less keep it current but now I'm considering it and
including
my library's books, too. I figure my heirs deserve a clue as to what's
worthwhile in all the crap they may want to dump or sell on eBay.

K Barrett

Dave Gillingham
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To email me remove the .private from my email address.

"tenman" wrote in message
...
Dave Gillingham wrote:
Kathy, there's another use as well as the unpleasant long term
consideration. It
helps no end in tracking repotting & other treatment needs. I also try
to
record *where* each plant is in my collection now. That's after
searching &
swearing, trying to find a particular plant (or many) that my database
says
should be repotted.

And, while I don't keep it all as up to date as I should, I do ensure
that each
purchase, loss, repot, and position on shelf is recorded.

For repotting, I find it far easier to sort the database by repot date
than to
work my way through the entire collection looking for the date of last
repot on
each tag.


You people need to get jobs! Having a library background, I used to be
a thorough record-keeper and very much enjoyed the process. Now I'm lucky
to find time for a rushed unenjoyable job of watering often enough to keep
the plants alive. Where do you folks find the time for this sort of thing?

Well, that was my opinion, too. As you know I rarely have time to water
either. 'Let 'em wait another week' is my motto. My life is go to work, go
home, go to work, go home. I crash on the sofa with the remote and nowadays
I'm in bed by 8:30pm. I tell you, life sucks sometimes. But my friend's
husband (not an orchid person) said that he wanted to be sure her collection
lived. He said he'd watch people walk out of shows with orchid purchases
that he *knew* were just going to die becasue no one knew how to care for
it. He doesn't want that to happen to her collection. She loved those
plants. So we're getting them appropriate homes, once we figure out what's
there. Hence the list. Hence my gratitude that my friend was meticulous.

K (the underwaterer) Barrett

wrote in message
...
i never planned on keeping track of the weeds--until a friend of mine
gave me a nice little blank book for xmas one year. i thought, "what
am i going to do with *this*?" and then said "ah ha..."

i note acqusition of the plant (name, nursery, brief description),
when it dies, or when i give it away, when it gets a registered name,
and if i win anything on it. (once, so far. repotting dates are on
plant tags in the pots.

however, i only have about 3 dozen plants, so it's all very casual.

but good points about the conservation issue....

--j_a

It took me a long time to learn not to get more plants than I could take
care of in a reasonable span of time. I probably have too many for my life
right now but of course I can't get rid of *any* of them! So learn from my
mistake. Keep your collection controlled, *G*!

K Barrett

On Mar 31, 11:38*am, "K Barrett" wrote:

It took me a long time to learn not to get more plants than I could take
care of in a reasonable span of time. *I probably have too many for my life
right now but of course I can't get rid of *any* of them! *So learn from my
mistake. *Keep your collection controlled, *G*!


it's all in terms of "what will fit on the windowseat?"

but then i have issues like:

went to repot the little encyclia chochleata (from a 2 inch pot into a
yogurt cup); discovered there were *2* plants in there. so now i have
the 2 inch pot AND the yogurt cup.

got a couple sale dens at kensington several yrs ago; they were about
a foot tall. they are now taking over the kitchen. one is about to
bloom on 2 spikes off a 3 foot cane. (but they're so *cute* when
they're little-!)

one of our club members brings in plants covered with keikis to
repot. we end up going home with little bitty plants. some straggle
along--and then there's one like the nobile-type den that may end up
taking over the kitchen one day.

so far it still only takes a couple hours once a week to water them
all in a leisurely fashion; i top off a few in the middle of the
week. this is about as many as i want to handle at the moment. (damn
this full time job anyway....)

--j_a

Wrong, wrong, WRONG!!!!!

You must learn to use technology to allow you to take care of many more
plants than you could by hand!

--

Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com
Plants, Supplies. Books, Artwork, and lots of Free Info!


"K Barrett" wrote
It took me a long time to learn not to get more plants than I could take
care of in a reasonable span of time. I probably have too many for my
life right now but of course I can't get rid of *any* of them! So learn
from my mistake. Keep your collection controlled, *G*!

On Mar 31, 5:26*pm, "Ray B" wrote:
Wrong, wrong, WRONG!!!!!

You must learn to use technology to allow you to take care of many more
plants than you could by hand!



hee!

--j_a

So, what does everyone use for this purpose? I had an Excel spreadsheet.
With it, I could add hyperlinks, sort, etc. But I'm hearing you guys talk
about data bases.

Which do you use?

Diana

"K Barrett" wrote in message
. ..
I wound up re-entering a lot of names just so I could search the database
easier. For example plants were listed as Blc, brassolaeliocattleya and
every spelling in between. A computer genius I'm not but I learned
consistency isn't a hobgoblin of small minds where databases are concerned,
*G*. I wish she had recorded when each plant exited out of the collection.
What initially looked like over 1000 plants on paper wound up being about
300 or so in real life. So far. We still have the outdoor plants to do.
But again, it should be easy to mark who's present and accounted for..

K Barrett

"Dave Gillingham" wrote in message
...
Kathy, there's another use as well as the unpleasant long term
consideration. It
helps no end in tracking repotting & other treatment needs. I also try
to
record *where* each plant is in my collection now. That's after
searching &
swearing, trying to find a particular plant (or many) that my database
says
should be repotted.

And, while I don't keep it all as up to date as I should, I do ensure
that each
purchase, loss, repot, and position on shelf is recorded.

For repotting, I find it far easier to sort the database by repot date
than to
work my way through the entire collection looking for the date of last
repot on
each tag.


On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:50:55 -0700, "K Barrett"
wrote:

Marilyn Light (North American chair of the Orchid Specialist Group) used
to
give OrchidSafari chats on the idea of orchid conservation vis a vis
hobbyist's orchid collections. Or to put it another way, since habitat
is
being lost our collections just may wind up housing important plants,
maybe
even one's no longer found in the wild. You may or may not agree with
that
idea but one of the things Marilyn used to stress was to keep and
maintain a
list of all your orchids, hybrids included, because some just might
become
important.

Lo and behold, my mentor did keep a list of her orchids. More importantly
she *maintained* the list! Dang, she even input purchases made just a
few
days before she died. (The woman was compulsive, *G*.) I can't tell you
how easy it has been for her family to figure out what's in the GH. It
only
took a day to figure out what's still extant in her collection. Way more
easy than the daunting task of cataloging what's in her library and
potting
shed.

So, while Marilyn Light might have had some lofty goal, thinking that a
list
of what's in the GH could conserve orchids in the wild, in reality its
made
one facet of my mentor's heir's lives real easy. People here have
mentioned
their orchid databases, some that even include flowering records. *Kudos
to
you all!* I never really was 'together' enough to make a list of my
orchids, much less keep it current but now I'm considering it and
including
my library's books, too. I figure my heirs deserve a clue as to what's
worthwhile in all the crap they may want to dump or sell on eBay.

K Barrett

Dave Gillingham
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To email me remove the .private from my email address.

I use MS Office Access 2007 & Access 97 before upgrading to the new OS
Vista.
I also toyed with the DB that ProfPam built "EverythingOrchid" but not sure
if she is still selling it. It was
really fancy with lots of various tables & reports etc. I can get her info
if anyone is interested.
Cheers Wendy


"Diana Kulaga" wrote in message
...
So, what does everyone use for this purpose? I had an Excel spreadsheet.
With it, I could add hyperlinks, sort, etc. But I'm hearing you guys talk
about data bases.

Which do you use?

Diana

"K Barrett" wrote in message
. ..
I wound up re-entering a lot of names just so I could search the database
easier. For example plants were listed as Blc, brassolaeliocattleya and
every spelling in between. A computer genius I'm not but I learned
consistency isn't a hobgoblin of small minds where databases are
concerned, *G*. I wish she had recorded when each plant exited out of the
collection. What initially looked like over 1000 plants on paper wound up
being about 300 or so in real life. So far. We still have the outdoor
plants to do. But again, it should be easy to mark who's present and
accounted for..

K Barrett

"Dave Gillingham" wrote in message
...
Kathy, there's another use as well as the unpleasant long term
consideration. It
helps no end in tracking repotting & other treatment needs. I also try
to
record *where* each plant is in my collection now. That's after
searching &
swearing, trying to find a particular plant (or many) that my database
says
should be repotted.

And, while I don't keep it all as up to date as I should, I do ensure
that each
purchase, loss, repot, and position on shelf is recorded.

For repotting, I find it far easier to sort the database by repot date
than to
work my way through the entire collection looking for the date of last
repot on
each tag.


On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:50:55 -0700, "K Barrett"
wrote:

Marilyn Light (North American chair of the Orchid Specialist Group) used
to
give OrchidSafari chats on the idea of orchid conservation vis a vis
hobbyist's orchid collections. Or to put it another way, since habitat
is
being lost our collections just may wind up housing important plants,
maybe
even one's no longer found in the wild. You may or may not agree with
that
idea but one of the things Marilyn used to stress was to keep and
maintain a
list of all your orchids, hybrids included, because some just might
become
important.

Lo and behold, my mentor did keep a list of her orchids. More
importantly
she *maintained* the list! Dang, she even input purchases made just a
few
days before she died. (The woman was compulsive, *G*.) I can't tell
you
how easy it has been for her family to figure out what's in the GH. It
only
took a day to figure out what's still extant in her collection. Way
more
easy than the daunting task of cataloging what's in her library and
potting
shed.

So, while Marilyn Light might have had some lofty goal, thinking that a
list
of what's in the GH could conserve orchids in the wild, in reality its
made
one facet of my mentor's heir's lives real easy. People here have
mentioned
their orchid databases, some that even include flowering records.
*Kudos to
you all!* I never really was 'together' enough to make a list of my
orchids, much less keep it current but now I'm considering it and
including
my library's books, too. I figure my heirs deserve a clue as to what's
worthwhile in all the crap they may want to dump or sell on eBay.

K Barrett

Dave Gillingham
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To email me remove the .private from my email address.

Heck I was just going to use Excel....

K


"Diana Kulaga" wrote in message
...
So, what does everyone use for this purpose? I had an Excel spreadsheet.
With it, I could add hyperlinks, sort, etc. But I'm hearing you guys talk
about data bases.

Which do you use?

Diana

"K Barrett" wrote in message
. ..
I wound up re-entering a lot of names just so I could search the database
easier. For example plants were listed as Blc, brassolaeliocattleya and
every spelling in between. A computer genius I'm not but I learned
consistency isn't a hobgoblin of small minds where databases are
concerned, *G*. I wish she had recorded when each plant exited out of the
collection. What initially looked like over 1000 plants on paper wound up
being about 300 or so in real life. So far. We still have the outdoor
plants to do. But again, it should be easy to mark who's present and
accounted for..

K Barrett

"Dave Gillingham" wrote in message
...
Kathy, there's another use as well as the unpleasant long term
consideration. It
helps no end in tracking repotting & other treatment needs. I also try
to
record *where* each plant is in my collection now. That's after
searching &
swearing, trying to find a particular plant (or many) that my database
says
should be repotted.

And, while I don't keep it all as up to date as I should, I do ensure
that each
purchase, loss, repot, and position on shelf is recorded.

For repotting, I find it far easier to sort the database by repot date
than to
work my way through the entire collection looking for the date of last
repot on
each tag.


On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:50:55 -0700, "K Barrett"
wrote:

Marilyn Light (North American chair of the Orchid Specialist Group) used
to
give OrchidSafari chats on the idea of orchid conservation vis a vis
hobbyist's orchid collections. Or to put it another way, since habitat
is
being lost our collections just may wind up housing important plants,
maybe
even one's no longer found in the wild. You may or may not agree with
that
idea but one of the things Marilyn used to stress was to keep and
maintain a
list of all your orchids, hybrids included, because some just might
become
important.

Lo and behold, my mentor did keep a list of her orchids. More
importantly
she *maintained* the list! Dang, she even input purchases made just a
few
days before she died. (The woman was compulsive, *G*.) I can't tell
you
how easy it has been for her family to figure out what's in the GH. It
only
took a day to figure out what's still extant in her collection. Way
more
easy than the daunting task of cataloging what's in her library and
potting
shed.

So, while Marilyn Light might have had some lofty goal, thinking that a
list
of what's in the GH could conserve orchids in the wild, in reality its
made
one facet of my mentor's heir's lives real easy. People here have
mentioned
their orchid databases, some that even include flowering records.
*Kudos to
you all!* I never really was 'together' enough to make a list of my
orchids, much less keep it current but now I'm considering it and
including
my library's books, too. I figure my heirs deserve a clue as to what's
worthwhile in all the crap they may want to dump or sell on eBay.

K Barrett

Dave Gillingham
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To email me remove the .private from my email address.