Gene finding could help spore orchid trade bloom
"Reka" wrote in message ... "J Fortuna" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... Reka, On the other hand, I wonder what the negative side effects of this genetic engineering can be. I noticed that the article mentioned that the speeding up process has to be turned off once the buds develop, or it might lead to deformed blooms. I wonder if the engineered orchids flower as long as normal ones of the same species though. Also will the plant's life expectancy change due to this process? Will it be less resistant, or more? It would be really neat if orchids could be genetically engineered to make them even harder to kill than they already are, by making them less susceptible to fungus for example? These were some of my own thoughts, hoping someone in the group could possibly shed some light on the subject. -- I would be quite wary of it. There is always a cost associated with any change we attempt to make in any system because of various kinds of feedback, and the result can often be unpredictable. With this particular example, if blooming happens sooner, presumably it happens on smaller plants, and thus the energy that would normally go to making a larger, more robust specimen is diverted into the bloom instead. I would expect that that would lead to higher mortality rates, even if kept in perfect conditions. Joanna has already pointed out that the gene being manipulated has to be turned off once the buds develop in order to avoid deformed flowers. I'd expect that it will be many years before most the ramifications of such a manipulation have been enumerated. Another issue arises wherein, if we suppose that the manipulation of the gene governing how quickly a given specimen can bloom will lead to reduced life span, as I'd expect when a plant is forced to bloom too young or small, there arises a conflict of interest between the producer and consumer, especially if the producer in question becomes dominant over the industry. It might become difficult to get specimens that haven't been so altered, and the producer might go so far as to produce only specimens that will bloom once and then die in an attempt to force us who love to try to grow orchids into buying one after another rather than simply maintaining our own collection. I could be wrong, but I would not be surprised if this sort of thing has been tried before, if not through direct genetic modification then through breeding. Certainly, it seems that plants that ought to have a reasonably long life (spanning a few years at least), cyclamen and begonias, behave as if they're annuals in my care. I have yet to pursuade even one of them to survive their first flowering. Of course, this may be because I am a moron, but I do recall reading that they have been selected to give one and only one spectacular display of flowers at the expense of those organs required to survive long enough to bloom again. In the case of cyclamen, I believe artificial selection has produced plants that have a tuber that is too small to allow a plant to survive its first display of flowers. And what happens if the modification is genetically dominant, modified plants are not labelled, and one of us uses a modified plant in an interesting cross not knowing it had been modified. How quickly or slowly will our collections be contaminated by a genetic configuration that speeds blooming but concommittantly increases mortality rates? But this isn't so much a question of genetic manipulation as it is of considering all the possible tradeoffs, since a similar modification can be obtained, albeit at a slower rate, from selective breeding. I wonder if anyone has collected data of survival rates adequate to compare life expectancy for early blooming hybrids and cultivars vs. plants cultivated from the seed from wild plants. If a given grower is breeding primarily for his own collection, I'd expect his early blooming hybrids would also survive quite well, but if he is breeding for a mass market (like the big box stores), he probably doesn't care if the hybrid survives its first flowering. I don't know, off hand, how one would check this sort of thing. There is a reason I tend to gravitate toward species, and particularly toward specimens thereof that are as close to the wild type as possible. From all this, one might infer I oppose genetic experimentation, but that would be wrong. It is necessary in order to figure out how genotypes relate to phenotypes. But when it comes to commercialization, I would tend toward extreme caution, just as one must be extremely cautious in any kind of environmental management. Cheers, Ted |
Gene finding could help spore orchid trade bloom
"J Fortuna" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... Reka, On the other hand, I wonder what the negative side effects of this genetic engineering can be. I noticed that the article mentioned that the speeding up process has to be turned off once the buds develop, or it might lead to deformed blooms. I wonder if the engineered orchids flower as long as normal ones of the same species though. Also will the plant's life expectancy change due to this process? Will it be less resistant, or more? It would be really neat if orchids could be genetically engineered to make them even harder to kill than they already are, by making them less susceptible to fungus for example? These were some of my own thoughts, hoping someone in the group could possibly shed some light on the subject. -- Reka I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way. Mark Twain (1835 - 1910) http://www.rolbox.it/hukari/index.html --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.558 / Virus Database: 350 - Release Date: 02.01.04 |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter