Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Kathy,
I suspect it's the light color and relative ease of removal that makes critter observation "easier"... Personally, I don't like the idea - too risky. Granted, the Taiwanese orchid nurseries are kept meticulously clean, but neither they nor the shipping containers are hermetically sealed, so the risk is still there. -- Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com Plants, Supplies, Books, Artwork, and Lots of Free Info! .. "K Barrett" wrote in message news:lQ1Yc.84402$mD.61372@attbi_s02... Really? Easier to see in sphagnum? I wouldn't think so, but hey. What do I know? K Barrett "Ray" wrote in message ... Kathy, If I remember some of my earlier reading correctly, the allowance is for plants in sphagnum only. While that does not rule out the occasional hitch hiking bug, it does make them easier to see. -- Ray Barkalow - First Rays Orchids - www.firstrays.com Plants, Supplies, Books, Artwork, and Lots of Free Info! . "K Barrett" wrote in message news:gdWXc.322929$a24.80842@attbi_s03... Well, apart from the real threat that potting medium will hold bugs - which no doubt some sort of critter some day will come in hiding in the bark |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
It is naive to think you can talk about this subject without politics. And
do not talk to me about strange bed fellows, the current administration is calling the shots backed by a congress controlled by his party. The head of the Dept of Ag is a member of the administration's cabinet. Those are simple facts. It is also naive to think that allowing the importation of in pot plants happens in a vacuum. Trade arrangements are made. 'You allow in pot plants, we back off steel restrictions.' We do not see the deals, just the results. As for level playing field, the world is not flat. Government paid construction costs and training, government sponsored low interest loans, and tax free periods all put bumps (and mountains) on the field. As most of these imported plants will be shipped on government owned airlines, it is not really even a single playing field. I expect moving $2B worth of in pot orchids means an annual $400M business for the exporting countries' national airlines. The Dutch have never consider the field level because US growers do not pay the same taxes on heating oil as charged on diesel fuel. I have heard the Canadian government subsidizes natural gas for their growers. It goes on and on. As for Taiwanese plants, I would not get too attached to them. I expect Taiwan's reign on the top will be a short one. The Taiwanese government is not the only government getting into the game. The Chinese government has also made a commitment to orchids and plants are already starting to flow out of that pipe line. I recently got an merriclone offering from the main land which undercut Taiwan prices by a larger percent than Taiwan undercut domestic prices. Labor in Taiwan is $600 a month while in China it is more like $100 a month. As for China, they would do best to watch their backs. Labor in Vietnam is more like $30 a month and I expect they will be playing a larger role in the game over the next few years. I do not know Thailand's wage structure, but it seems that they are also about to get in the game in a big way as well. "David Edgley" wrote in message ... For the purposes of this newsgroup, I have no political inclination and would appreciate others keeping politics out of the discussion. However, if someone were propose intelligent reform of CITES as it relates to orchids, I would be sorely tempted to abandon my position. David "J. Del Col" wrote in message m... (janet_a) wrote in message . com... August 24, 2004 Orchids Flourish on Taiwanese Production Line By KEITH BRADSHER That's the way capitalism works, folks. Free trade is the answer to everything; just ask George Bush. J. Del Col |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
It is naive to think you can talk about this subject without politics. And
do not talk to me about strange bed fellows, the current administration is calling the shots backed by a congress controlled by his party. The head of the Dept of Ag is a member of the administration's cabinet. Those are simple facts. It is also naive to think that allowing the importation of in pot plants happens in a vacuum. Trade arrangements are made. 'You allow in pot plants, we back off steel restrictions.' We do not see the deals, just the results. As for level playing field, the world is not flat. Government paid construction costs and training, government sponsored low interest loans, and tax free periods all put bumps (and mountains) on the field. As most of these imported plants will be shipped on government owned airlines, it is not really even a single playing field. I expect moving $2B worth of in pot orchids means an annual $400M business for the exporting countries' national airlines. The Dutch have never consider the field level because US growers do not pay the same taxes on heating oil as charged on diesel fuel. I have heard the Canadian government subsidizes natural gas for their growers. It goes on and on. As for Taiwanese plants, I would not get too attached to them. I expect Taiwan's reign on the top will be a short one. The Taiwanese government is not the only government getting into the game. The Chinese government has also made a commitment to orchids and plants are already starting to flow out of that pipe line. I recently got an merriclone offering from the main land which undercut Taiwan prices by a larger percent than Taiwan undercut domestic prices. Labor in Taiwan is $600 a month while in China it is more like $100 a month. As for China, they would do best to watch their backs. Labor in Vietnam is more like $30 a month and I expect they will be playing a larger role in the game over the next few years. I do not know Thailand's wage structure, but it seems that they are also about to get in the game in a big way as well. "David Edgley" wrote in message ... For the purposes of this newsgroup, I have no political inclination and would appreciate others keeping politics out of the discussion. However, if someone were propose intelligent reform of CITES as it relates to orchids, I would be sorely tempted to abandon my position. David "J. Del Col" wrote in message m... (janet_a) wrote in message . com... August 24, 2004 Orchids Flourish on Taiwanese Production Line By KEITH BRADSHER That's the way capitalism works, folks. Free trade is the answer to everything; just ask George Bush. J. Del Col |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
The point about trade not happening in a vaccuum is a good one. I'm sure
something along the lines of mutual rubbing of backs occurred. I can't see where bringing in already potted plants makes economic sense. They are so huge and bulky. You get so many more of them in a flask in a much smaller space, no? Does it really cost so much more to finish them here? *G* Well I guess it must, else this wouldn't be happening! LOL! K Barrett "Pat Brennan" wrote in message ... It is naive to think you can talk about this subject without politics. And do not talk to me about strange bed fellows, the current administration is calling the shots backed by a congress controlled by his party. The head of the Dept of Ag is a member of the administration's cabinet. Those are simple facts. It is also naive to think that allowing the importation of in pot plants happens in a vacuum. Trade arrangements are made. 'You allow in pot plants, we back off steel restrictions.' We do not see the deals, just the results. As for level playing field, the world is not flat. Government paid construction costs and training, government sponsored low interest loans, and tax free periods all put bumps (and mountains) on the field. As most of these imported plants will be shipped on government owned airlines, it is not really even a single playing field. I expect moving $2B worth of in pot orchids means an annual $400M business for the exporting countries' national airlines. The Dutch have never consider the field level because US growers do not pay the same taxes on heating oil as charged on diesel fuel. I have heard the Canadian government subsidizes natural gas for their growers. It goes on and on. As for Taiwanese plants, I would not get too attached to them. I expect Taiwan's reign on the top will be a short one. The Taiwanese government is not the only government getting into the game. The Chinese government has also made a commitment to orchids and plants are already starting to flow out of that pipe line. I recently got an merriclone offering from the main land which undercut Taiwan prices by a larger percent than Taiwan undercut domestic prices. Labor in Taiwan is $600 a month while in China it is more like $100 a month. As for China, they would do best to watch their backs. Labor in Vietnam is more like $30 a month and I expect they will be playing a larger role in the game over the next few years. I do not know Thailand's wage structure, but it seems that they are also about to get in the game in a big way as well. "David Edgley" wrote in message ... For the purposes of this newsgroup, I have no political inclination and would appreciate others keeping politics out of the discussion. However, if someone were propose intelligent reform of CITES as it relates to orchids, I would be sorely tempted to abandon my position. David "J. Del Col" wrote in message m... (janet_a) wrote in message . com... August 24, 2004 Orchids Flourish on Taiwanese Production Line By KEITH BRADSHER That's the way capitalism works, folks. Free trade is the answer to everything; just ask George Bush. J. Del Col |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
The point about trade not happening in a vaccuum is a good one. I'm sure
something along the lines of mutual rubbing of backs occurred. I can't see where bringing in already potted plants makes economic sense. They are so huge and bulky. You get so many more of them in a flask in a much smaller space, no? Does it really cost so much more to finish them here? *G* Well I guess it must, else this wouldn't be happening! LOL! K Barrett "Pat Brennan" wrote in message ... It is naive to think you can talk about this subject without politics. And do not talk to me about strange bed fellows, the current administration is calling the shots backed by a congress controlled by his party. The head of the Dept of Ag is a member of the administration's cabinet. Those are simple facts. It is also naive to think that allowing the importation of in pot plants happens in a vacuum. Trade arrangements are made. 'You allow in pot plants, we back off steel restrictions.' We do not see the deals, just the results. As for level playing field, the world is not flat. Government paid construction costs and training, government sponsored low interest loans, and tax free periods all put bumps (and mountains) on the field. As most of these imported plants will be shipped on government owned airlines, it is not really even a single playing field. I expect moving $2B worth of in pot orchids means an annual $400M business for the exporting countries' national airlines. The Dutch have never consider the field level because US growers do not pay the same taxes on heating oil as charged on diesel fuel. I have heard the Canadian government subsidizes natural gas for their growers. It goes on and on. As for Taiwanese plants, I would not get too attached to them. I expect Taiwan's reign on the top will be a short one. The Taiwanese government is not the only government getting into the game. The Chinese government has also made a commitment to orchids and plants are already starting to flow out of that pipe line. I recently got an merriclone offering from the main land which undercut Taiwan prices by a larger percent than Taiwan undercut domestic prices. Labor in Taiwan is $600 a month while in China it is more like $100 a month. As for China, they would do best to watch their backs. Labor in Vietnam is more like $30 a month and I expect they will be playing a larger role in the game over the next few years. I do not know Thailand's wage structure, but it seems that they are also about to get in the game in a big way as well. "David Edgley" wrote in message ... For the purposes of this newsgroup, I have no political inclination and would appreciate others keeping politics out of the discussion. However, if someone were propose intelligent reform of CITES as it relates to orchids, I would be sorely tempted to abandon my position. David "J. Del Col" wrote in message m... (janet_a) wrote in message . com... August 24, 2004 Orchids Flourish on Taiwanese Production Line By KEITH BRADSHER That's the way capitalism works, folks. Free trade is the answer to everything; just ask George Bush. J. Del Col |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks Jerry
K Barrett "Clanorchid" wrote in message ... Hi Group; Just our long winded 2 cents worth. I had not heard that Taisuco had built facilities in the US Yes and here in Fl, we also have several South Korean, one Dutch, one English, several Thai, two Venezulean, three Japanese, one Brazilian and several Taiwanese companies. I'm sure there are several more that we just haven't found yet. Most are located in and around Apopoka, FL. (near Orlando) and Homestead (Miami). Several have been here over five years, and are now supplying most of the Big Box Orchid markets, through their own marketing companies or to American middle men. Primary products are Phal. hybrids, Oncidium Alliance, Cattleya, and Dendrobium hybrids. Last year some of these companies started bringing in standard Cymbidiums. The Dutch, Japanese, Venezulean are new state of the art. The others are converted from long standing foliage growing operations. The above is for Florida, someone from California, Hawaii, and Arizona can advise about the "new" facilities in those states. We are having enough trouble keeping up with the new ones in FL. LOL. All of these facilities have been in the USA for many years, the NY Times is evidently just now finding out about them. Interestingly, the Hawaiian Growers are the most upset, but according to the 2003 USDA Plant survey, Hawaii ranks 18th in potted orchid sales, well below Calif (#1) and FL (#2), but the Hawaiian import nearly 50% of the plants they use for potted plant sales. So they stand to lose a chunk of their income. Actually, the orchid hobbyists are not the "force" behind the Orchid explosion. It is the floral, interior design businesses and the casual plant buyers which are feeding the "orchid craze" (Buy it and Throw it away mentality). The hobbyist is just the beneficiary of this current fad. As a sign of the times, two years ago Karen and I were visiting one of the Korean establishments in Apopka. About ten acres under cover, with no less than 100K pots in full bloom, with just as many more in bud. Incredible sight. We were back several months later, and many of the plants were still there, albeit out of bloom. This year, we noticed some of the Phal space had been turned over to lucky bamboo, Ti plants, and money trees. Plus the owner was out on the plant sale circuit, around Florida, peddling his Phals. (Two spikes 20+ flowers, 2 for $15.00 retail). The "boom" may be off the Phal. market. IMHO, the potted dendrobium market is the next to get "depressed", one of the Japanese FL operations has two locations, with ten and seventeen acres under cover, currently producing so many plants, they cannot sell them all. If I remember some of my earlier reading correctly, the allowance is for plants in sphagnum only. Currently orchid plants can be imported bare root, attached to or in tree fern fiber, or coconut fiber or husk. I think the approval, which Taiwan, and now the Dutch, are seeking, covers "approved growing media" as defined in 7CFR 319.37-8(e)(1) " Approved growing media are baked expanded clay pellets, coal cinder, coir, cork, glass wool, organic and inorganic fibers, peat, perlite, phenol formaldehyde, plastic particles, polyethylene, polymer stabilized starch, polystyrene, polyurethane, rock wool, sphagnum moss, ureaformaldehyde, stockosorb superabsorbent polymer, vermiculite, volcanic rock, or zeolite, or any combination of these media. Growing media must not have been previously used." At least their initial petitions and subsequent USDA Final Environmental Assessment in December, 2003 was for "approved media". The FEA did not differinate between medias. Actually, I don't think the USDA can differiate, because of the previous approval of allowing other genera, such as gloxnia and begonias, in pots, with "approved media". Just the tip of the iceberg Jerry a href="http://www.clanorchids.com/"Camp Lot A Noise Tropicals (C. L. A. N.)/a http://www.clanorchids.com/ Orchid Species, Hybrids, Supplies, Photos and Books Chat (941) 352-2483 Fax: (941) 351-2483 X 123 Order Only 1-800-351-CITE |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks Jerry
K Barrett "Clanorchid" wrote in message ... Hi Group; Just our long winded 2 cents worth. I had not heard that Taisuco had built facilities in the US Yes and here in Fl, we also have several South Korean, one Dutch, one English, several Thai, two Venezulean, three Japanese, one Brazilian and several Taiwanese companies. I'm sure there are several more that we just haven't found yet. Most are located in and around Apopoka, FL. (near Orlando) and Homestead (Miami). Several have been here over five years, and are now supplying most of the Big Box Orchid markets, through their own marketing companies or to American middle men. Primary products are Phal. hybrids, Oncidium Alliance, Cattleya, and Dendrobium hybrids. Last year some of these companies started bringing in standard Cymbidiums. The Dutch, Japanese, Venezulean are new state of the art. The others are converted from long standing foliage growing operations. The above is for Florida, someone from California, Hawaii, and Arizona can advise about the "new" facilities in those states. We are having enough trouble keeping up with the new ones in FL. LOL. All of these facilities have been in the USA for many years, the NY Times is evidently just now finding out about them. Interestingly, the Hawaiian Growers are the most upset, but according to the 2003 USDA Plant survey, Hawaii ranks 18th in potted orchid sales, well below Calif (#1) and FL (#2), but the Hawaiian import nearly 50% of the plants they use for potted plant sales. So they stand to lose a chunk of their income. Actually, the orchid hobbyists are not the "force" behind the Orchid explosion. It is the floral, interior design businesses and the casual plant buyers which are feeding the "orchid craze" (Buy it and Throw it away mentality). The hobbyist is just the beneficiary of this current fad. As a sign of the times, two years ago Karen and I were visiting one of the Korean establishments in Apopka. About ten acres under cover, with no less than 100K pots in full bloom, with just as many more in bud. Incredible sight. We were back several months later, and many of the plants were still there, albeit out of bloom. This year, we noticed some of the Phal space had been turned over to lucky bamboo, Ti plants, and money trees. Plus the owner was out on the plant sale circuit, around Florida, peddling his Phals. (Two spikes 20+ flowers, 2 for $15.00 retail). The "boom" may be off the Phal. market. IMHO, the potted dendrobium market is the next to get "depressed", one of the Japanese FL operations has two locations, with ten and seventeen acres under cover, currently producing so many plants, they cannot sell them all. If I remember some of my earlier reading correctly, the allowance is for plants in sphagnum only. Currently orchid plants can be imported bare root, attached to or in tree fern fiber, or coconut fiber or husk. I think the approval, which Taiwan, and now the Dutch, are seeking, covers "approved growing media" as defined in 7CFR 319.37-8(e)(1) " Approved growing media are baked expanded clay pellets, coal cinder, coir, cork, glass wool, organic and inorganic fibers, peat, perlite, phenol formaldehyde, plastic particles, polyethylene, polymer stabilized starch, polystyrene, polyurethane, rock wool, sphagnum moss, ureaformaldehyde, stockosorb superabsorbent polymer, vermiculite, volcanic rock, or zeolite, or any combination of these media. Growing media must not have been previously used." At least their initial petitions and subsequent USDA Final Environmental Assessment in December, 2003 was for "approved media". The FEA did not differinate between medias. Actually, I don't think the USDA can differiate, because of the previous approval of allowing other genera, such as gloxnia and begonias, in pots, with "approved media". Just the tip of the iceberg Jerry a href="http://www.clanorchids.com/"Camp Lot A Noise Tropicals (C. L. A. N.)/a http://www.clanorchids.com/ Orchid Species, Hybrids, Supplies, Photos and Books Chat (941) 352-2483 Fax: (941) 351-2483 X 123 Order Only 1-800-351-CITE |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks Jerry
K Barrett "Clanorchid" wrote in message ... Hi Group; Just our long winded 2 cents worth. I had not heard that Taisuco had built facilities in the US Yes and here in Fl, we also have several South Korean, one Dutch, one English, several Thai, two Venezulean, three Japanese, one Brazilian and several Taiwanese companies. I'm sure there are several more that we just haven't found yet. Most are located in and around Apopoka, FL. (near Orlando) and Homestead (Miami). Several have been here over five years, and are now supplying most of the Big Box Orchid markets, through their own marketing companies or to American middle men. Primary products are Phal. hybrids, Oncidium Alliance, Cattleya, and Dendrobium hybrids. Last year some of these companies started bringing in standard Cymbidiums. The Dutch, Japanese, Venezulean are new state of the art. The others are converted from long standing foliage growing operations. The above is for Florida, someone from California, Hawaii, and Arizona can advise about the "new" facilities in those states. We are having enough trouble keeping up with the new ones in FL. LOL. All of these facilities have been in the USA for many years, the NY Times is evidently just now finding out about them. Interestingly, the Hawaiian Growers are the most upset, but according to the 2003 USDA Plant survey, Hawaii ranks 18th in potted orchid sales, well below Calif (#1) and FL (#2), but the Hawaiian import nearly 50% of the plants they use for potted plant sales. So they stand to lose a chunk of their income. Actually, the orchid hobbyists are not the "force" behind the Orchid explosion. It is the floral, interior design businesses and the casual plant buyers which are feeding the "orchid craze" (Buy it and Throw it away mentality). The hobbyist is just the beneficiary of this current fad. As a sign of the times, two years ago Karen and I were visiting one of the Korean establishments in Apopka. About ten acres under cover, with no less than 100K pots in full bloom, with just as many more in bud. Incredible sight. We were back several months later, and many of the plants were still there, albeit out of bloom. This year, we noticed some of the Phal space had been turned over to lucky bamboo, Ti plants, and money trees. Plus the owner was out on the plant sale circuit, around Florida, peddling his Phals. (Two spikes 20+ flowers, 2 for $15.00 retail). The "boom" may be off the Phal. market. IMHO, the potted dendrobium market is the next to get "depressed", one of the Japanese FL operations has two locations, with ten and seventeen acres under cover, currently producing so many plants, they cannot sell them all. If I remember some of my earlier reading correctly, the allowance is for plants in sphagnum only. Currently orchid plants can be imported bare root, attached to or in tree fern fiber, or coconut fiber or husk. I think the approval, which Taiwan, and now the Dutch, are seeking, covers "approved growing media" as defined in 7CFR 319.37-8(e)(1) " Approved growing media are baked expanded clay pellets, coal cinder, coir, cork, glass wool, organic and inorganic fibers, peat, perlite, phenol formaldehyde, plastic particles, polyethylene, polymer stabilized starch, polystyrene, polyurethane, rock wool, sphagnum moss, ureaformaldehyde, stockosorb superabsorbent polymer, vermiculite, volcanic rock, or zeolite, or any combination of these media. Growing media must not have been previously used." At least their initial petitions and subsequent USDA Final Environmental Assessment in December, 2003 was for "approved media". The FEA did not differinate between medias. Actually, I don't think the USDA can differiate, because of the previous approval of allowing other genera, such as gloxnia and begonias, in pots, with "approved media". Just the tip of the iceberg Jerry a href="http://www.clanorchids.com/"Camp Lot A Noise Tropicals (C. L. A. N.)/a http://www.clanorchids.com/ Orchid Species, Hybrids, Supplies, Photos and Books Chat (941) 352-2483 Fax: (941) 351-2483 X 123 Order Only 1-800-351-CITE |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Group,
Just another observation, the NY Times article indicates change is being considered. Actually, the change is effective and in place, since June 6, 2004. I can't see where bringing in already potted plants makes economic sense. They are so huge and bulky. You get so many more of them in a flask in a much smaller space, no? Does it really cost so much more to finish them here? I wouldn't mind having plants imported bare root and potted up here. That was the method. All imported orchid plants were brought in bare root, repotted in approved media, and grown in US of A for four months prior to sale, then inspected. (Except for importations in coconut chips or coir, and attached to tree fern) It is a time and money factor. Import an in bloom plant and you save labor (unpotting and repotting), greenhouse space (in front door, out the back door to the contract stores). The four month in US of A growing period and inspection also disappears, as well as losses due to cultural problems. A flask, yes has many plants, but growing time is required. IMHO, the plus is the plants, from the flasks, may adapt better to US of A conditions, than a blooming plant. This not new Q37, as the rules are commonly known, has been under attack for many years. Currently there are a number genera of plants, for which Q37 has been suspended. Quick to mind is Begonias, African Violets, Peperomia, some ferns. There are others, but I forget them now. The authority for some of these exemptions dates back to 1990, or earlier. Heck the exemption petition from Taiwan was in 1997. The USDA documents regarding Q37 being suspended are interesting. Dating back to 1998, USDA indicates there are 41 Phal growers in CA, 41 Phal growers in FL, and 101 Phal growers in the other 48 states, and economic impact on these growers is unknown, but expected to substantial. However, they do note that Hawaii is the leading importer of bare root Phals, for potted plant sales. For some reason the Phal Q37 pages on USDA and APHIS websites have gone down today. Orchidists must be getting interested. Cheers, Jerry and Karen Camp Lot A Noise Tropicals (C. L. A. N.) http://www.clanorchids.com Orchid Species, Hybrids, Supplies, Photos and Books Chat (941) 352-2483 Fax: (941) 351-2483 X 123 Order Only 1-800-351-CITE |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Wow!! Much here to ruminate on... Thanks for posting and if i don't reply
immediately tis because I'm still thinking. K Barrett "Clanorchid" wrote in message ... Hi Group, Just another observation, the NY Times article indicates change is being considered. Actually, the change is effective and in place, since June 6, 2004. I can't see where bringing in already potted plants makes economic sense. They are so huge and bulky. You get so many more of them in a flask in a much smaller space, no? Does it really cost so much more to finish them here? I wouldn't mind having plants imported bare root and potted up here. That was the method. All imported orchid plants were brought in bare root, repotted in approved media, and grown in US of A for four months prior to sale, then inspected. (Except for importations in coconut chips or coir, and attached to tree fern) It is a time and money factor. Import an in bloom plant and you save labor (unpotting and repotting), greenhouse space (in front door, out the back door to the contract stores). The four month in US of A growing period and inspection also disappears, as well as losses due to cultural problems. A flask, yes has many plants, but growing time is required. IMHO, the plus is the plants, from the flasks, may adapt better to US of A conditions, than a blooming plant. This not new Q37, as the rules are commonly known, has been under attack for many years. Currently there are a number genera of plants, for which Q37 has been suspended. Quick to mind is Begonias, African Violets, Peperomia, some ferns. There are others, but I forget them now. The authority for some of these exemptions dates back to 1990, or earlier. Heck the exemption petition from Taiwan was in 1997. The USDA documents regarding Q37 being suspended are interesting. Dating back to 1998, USDA indicates there are 41 Phal growers in CA, 41 Phal growers in FL, and 101 Phal growers in the other 48 states, and economic impact on these growers is unknown, but expected to substantial. However, they do note that Hawaii is the leading importer of bare root Phals, for potted plant sales. For some reason the Phal Q37 pages on USDA and APHIS websites have gone down today. Orchidists must be getting interested. Cheers, Jerry and Karen Camp Lot A Noise Tropicals (C. L. A. N.) http://www.clanorchids.com Orchid Species, Hybrids, Supplies, Photos and Books Chat (941) 352-2483 Fax: (941) 351-2483 X 123 Order Only 1-800-351-CITE |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Group;
It's been a long time but since when did this requirement go into effect. We used to just bring the plants in bare root they would go through USDA Inspection at their entry point, usually NY, and then were sent on their merry way to us. No four month quarantine. There is no four month quarantine. The article refers to the Phals' re establishment period, after repotting in the US of A, usually 6 to 8 months. Actual FL average is usually four months. Believe that refers to the USDA and State plant inspection cycles, which has the inspector coming every ninety days. Need the inspection certificate to move the plants in interstate or intrastate commerce. With elimination of Q37 for Phals., the inspection certificate could be issued on landing, no grow out period. As is now done for Phals, Cats, Dends, etc, landing in coconut or tree fern. The Taiwanese seem to dislike coconut, but the Thais love it, just check at HD or Lowes. Since 1983 (date of our commercial import permits) for us, the inspectors show up like clock work. Recently, he got here two days after the shipment arrived. In FL, the state inspectors automatically get a copy of all commercial orchid shipment manifests from USDA, MM. Casual walk throughs or small hand carried luggage are seldom noted, even though USDA and FWS have confiscatory powers, under CITES. Well, Bye. Got to batten down. Charley missed us by 30 miles, but looks like Frances is going to get us from behind. Good Luck Diana and Frank, Mick, and all other FL RGOers, hope to see all of you back here after the 'blow. Jerry and Karen Camp Lot A Noise Tropicals (C. L. A. N.) http://www.clanorchids.com Orchid Species, Hybrids, Supplies, Photos and Books Chat (941) 352-2483 Fax: (941) 351-2483 X 123 Order Only 1-800-351-CITE |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Taiwan waste water pond | Ponds | |||
New variety of adenium from Taiwan | Bonsai | |||
New variety of adenium in Taiwan on sale | Gardening | |||
IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTIONS // NEW DEADLINE // TAIWAN // special commemorative gift // WSEAS | Plant Biology | |||
Govt regs Phal importation from Taiwan | Orchids |