Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How come only 2 threads here?
I thought permaculture was the way to save the planet. So why only 2 threads in this ng? Cheers, JD |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How come only 2 threads here?
Not a lot of PC people on newsgroups for some reasons.
More on this list server it seems: Maybe because it's simpler...my GF subscribes to the listserver, but she can't figure out newsgroups. Good luck, Gerald On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:46:22 +0100, JakeD wrote: I thought permaculture was the way to save the planet. So why only 2 threads in this ng? Cheers, JD |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
How come only 2 threads here?
g'day jake,
just the way pc is being driven, away from the grass roots level. this group was very vibrant and almost over night secular interest infighting nailed it. the ideals of pc can encourage people to think about how they do things and what they do, permaculture itself can't obtain those ideals without infuencing the masses. sadly it is pretty much the domain of all pc boards one or 2 may have idle chat about anything that could be dealt with under other boards but nothing that pertains much to the ideals of looking after our habitat and the health of the planet in the long term interests of the health of us inhabitants. On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:46:22 +0100, JakeD wrote: snipped With peace and brightest of blessings, len & bev -- "Be Content With What You Have And May You Find Serenity and Tranquillity In A World That You May Not Understand." http://www.lensgarden.com.au/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
How come only 2 threads here?
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 23:16:09 -0400, Gerald
wrote: More on this list server it seems: Maybe because it's simpler...my GF subscribes to the listserver, but she can't figure out newsgroups. Gerald, Thanks for the lead. I've never used mailing lists much in the past, having always prefered the way newsgroups work. However, I must subscribe to the one above and give it a try. ..not that I have much to offer; I am really a beginner, seeking to widen my knowledge. Regards, JD |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
How come only 2 threads here?
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:19:43 GMT, len garden
wrote: just the way pc is being driven, away from the grass roots level. this group was very vibrant and almost over night secular interest infighting nailed it. Hi Len, That's unfortunate. I think that can happen in just about any ng, depending on who gets involved. I've abandoned a few in the past. JD |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
How come only 2 threads here?
yes jake,
it scares away new players in the field as no one wants to join a board where they may get abused, me i reckon i have a right like anyone else to be here, but not like some that are involved who have agendas to push. it is the 'permaculture' for sale agenda that is stopping pc from being accepted by the rank and file at grass roots level the greed of the dollar and the mistaken concept that an expensive course needs to be undertaken before you can say you follow pc principals. i've had a number of e/mails asking where new comers might find open free chat about pc without the pressure of buying something, just nowhere around at present. like many others i have been targetted but not like most i'm staying put. now wouldn't it be great if we could encourage enough new players to come on board and promote different mind sets? currently pc is seen by most as the modern nimbin hippyism and they just won't come to the party. On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:11:42 +0100, JakeD wrote: snipped With peace and brightest of blessings, len & bev -- "Be Content With What You Have And May You Find Serenity and Tranquillity In A World That You May Not Understand." http://www.lensgarden.com.au/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
How come only 2 threads here?
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:03:51 GMT, len garden
wrote: yes jake, it scares away new players in the field as no one wants to join a board where they may get abused, me i reckon i have a right like anyone else to be here, but not like some that are involved who have agendas to push. it is the 'permaculture' for sale agenda that is stopping pc from being accepted by the rank and file at grass roots level the greed of the dollar and the mistaken concept that an expensive course needs to be undertaken before you can say you follow pc principals. i've had a number of e/mails asking where new comers might find open free chat about pc without the pressure of buying something, just nowhere around at present. Yes. I'm probably just scratching the surface of the pc philosophy. But can I digress onto semantics? When I first heard the word 'permaculture' it was a noun used by someone describing the practice of growing crops that yield produce year after year with little human effort required. When I looked the word up on Wikipedia, and other places, I found that the word has more than that and more than one distinct meaning, as far as I can tell. I are say it may mean different thiongs to different people, so I'll come to the point and state what I'm really interested in... I'm mainly interested in the subject of self-sufficient (or as near as possible) communities. I was inspired by an essay by Australian, Bill Trainer that convinced me that self-sufficient communities, pursuing an organic, self-sufficient, energy-efficient lifestyle, off-grid, is the best way to live, for many reasons. I can invisage that if disaster happens (due to oil running out or whatever), such communities will be among the few with the skills and resources to survive. It made me aware of the wrongness of the way I've been living, buying into wasteful destructive consumerism, like there's no tomorrow, etc. I used to feel justified in living like that, until I became aware and convinced that there's realistically a better way, and a better type of community. I just happen to have a wad of cash in the bank right now, having just sold my house. I'm thinking of buying land somewhere, and pursuing a more self-sufficient lifestyle, perhaps with some like-minded people, here in the British Isles, or even somewhere on mainland Europe. But first, I am just reading up on relevant subject-matter, in preparation. How about youself? What pc-related pursuits are you involved with? JD |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
How come only 2 threads here?
g'day jake,
yes the term permaculture has a broad spectrum as it is meant to have this is so all can use its principals in their own space. we have had to move back to suburbia so as much as we can we run our living standard under the principlas of p/c. everything we do is documented on our page. on "self-sufficiency" i wrota an essay on what i call the myth as it like permaculture has become a catch cry term for the "feel-gooder's" to use so they can appear to appear green for want of a better term. anyhow many who go for the sea/tree-change never realy bite the bullit of opportunity to think outside the box, to test the comfort envelope and realy think latteraly. we designed and had built a design of home that is much more affordable to build and is also very user friendly being of 'warm-house/cool-house' concepts, the design can be adapted easily for our climate zones as can the type of cladding used, it is simple and it works. if a house is going to be renewables wise and comfortable naturally then the aspect of the land (an art many have forgotten) is a major consideration. we came to this design after disregarding the industry standard models (the must fit indoctrinated ideals designs) and taking note of what others did especially an architect up darwin way. this is truely affordable housing for all players. for the main we have found the when folk go looking to rural change they realy don't develop a defined criteria of what they expect do achieve so they buy the land they need for their wants and those of the habitat. take the opportunity ot visit our site, all is explained there. loof forward to more cahts if you wish please feel free to use e/mail if you also desire. our link is featured below On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:34:44 +0100, JakeD wrote: snipped With peace and brightest of blessings, len & bev -- "Be Content With What You Have And May You Find Serenity and Tranquillity In A World That You May Not Understand." http://www.lensgarden.com.au/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
How come only 2 threads here?
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:15:45 GMT, len garden
wrote: on "self-sufficiency" i wrota an essay on what i call the myth as it like permaculture has become a catch cry term for the "feel-gooder's" to use so they can appear to appear green for want of a better term. Point taken, Len. I totally agree that complete self-sufficiency must be close to impossible and undoubtedly not much fun! I was thinking more along the lines of needing to be much more self-sufficint that I am at present. At the very least, not reliant on supermarkets and such. Ted Trainer wrote, somewhe " We must develop as much self-sufficiency as we reasonably can at the national level, meaning less trade, at the household level, and especially at the neighbourhood, suburban, town and local regional level. We need to convert our presently barren suburbs into thriving regional economies which produce most of what they need from local resources." for the main we have found the when folk go looking to rural change they realy don't develop a defined criteria of what they expect do achieve so they buy the land they need for their wants and those of the habitat. Yes; I can well imagine that! I definitely plan to educate myself a bit before putting my money into land. I also need to find out about the planning regs and attitudes in the areas of interest. take the opportunity ot visit our site, all is explained there. loof forward to more cahts if you wish please feel free to use e/mail if you also desire. our link is featured below Nicely-done website, with plenty of substance, thanks; I will be revisiting that one! With peace and brightest of blessings, Likewise.. JD |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
How come only 2 threads here?
"len garden" wrote in message
just the way pc is being driven, away from the grass roots level. this group was very vibrant and almost over night secular interest infighting nailed it. It wasn't that Len, it was the fact that we were a very stable group who posted here where no new people arrived and because we all posted with monotonous regularity we had all discussed permie together for so darned long there was nothing new to discuss. And we got spam botted for a long time by the loonie spammers. It became unviable. Perhaps if there are some new people around now we can resurrect it. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
How come only 2 threads here?
"JakeD" wrote in message
But can I digress onto semantics? When I first heard the word 'permaculture' it was a noun used by someone describing the practice of growing crops that yield produce year after year with little human effort required. When I looked the word up on Wikipedia, and other places, I found that the word has more than that and more than one distinct meaning, as far as I can tell. I are say it may mean different thiongs to different people, so I'll come to the point and state what I'm really interested in... Fairly good summation, but pricipally it's about design. ie zones of high use items are placed closest to the main living area and less used items are placed further away. So, for eg, a salad cutting bed would be closest to the dwelling that the trees which will only produce a crop one a year. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
How come only 2 threads here?
"len garden" wrote in message
we have had to move back to suburbia so as much as we can we run our living standard under the principlas of p/c. everything we do is documented on our page. Len, are there any pics of your current city house on your site or only pics of the place where you lived in the bush before moving back to the city? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
How come only 2 threads here?
On Sep 23, 3:46 am, JakeD wrote:
I thought permaculture was the way to save the planet. So why only 2 threads in this ng? Cheers, JD G'day, The forum with the highest participation can be found through the www.permaculture.org.au website. There are only so many of us unfortunately.... Hooroo, Darren Doherty www.permaculture.biz |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
How come only 2 threads here?
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:16:04 +1000, "FarmI" ask@itshall be given
wrote: Fairly good summation, but pricipally it's about design. ie zones of high use items are placed closest to the main living area and less used items are placed further away. So, for eg, a salad cutting bed would be closest to the dwelling that the trees which will only produce a crop one a year. Hi, Thanks. I must read up on that aspect of it. JD |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
How come only 2 threads here?
farml,
no pics of current house as there is nothing inspirational in this regular macmansion inefficient design to talk to others about, plenty of pics of these type homes online on home builder web sites. On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:25:23 +1000, "FarmI" ask@itshall be given wrote: snipped With peace and brightest of blessings, len & bev -- "Be Content With What You Have And May You Find Serenity and Tranquillity In A World That You May Not Understand." http://www.lensgarden.com.au/ |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT threads (loose threads) | United Kingdom | |||
'Similar threads' installed | About GardenBanter | |||
crap all my personal threads are gone | Gardening | |||
UK ONLY - Plants going free (or at least only the cost of postage)!! | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
Threads | United Kingdom |