Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bioengeneering? TRANSGENICS? Harvests cultures on Human remains...
Posted in google groups: Bioengeneering? TRANSGENICS? Harvests
cultures on Human remains... It is a covert form of cannibally and... a cheap way to engage in **advanced bio-technology**. For some people it would be an obvious possibility, while for some cultures (pun meaningful), it would be a customary and natural operation, hidden by ritual and customs and not worth mentioning... to Occidental or urban minds, or a secret transmitted within (schizophrenic) families. For a rational mind, it would be the only, or main, reason, to oppose transgenic food: that it would be the result of empiric, uncontrollable methods amounting to real natural experimentation with an unaware population. No wonder the mobs! Or the **paradoxic** warning in some drinks: this uses advanced technology but no (advanced bioengineered) transgenics**. That it may be a normal practice for some governments, to allow and market Human remains cultured cultures, does introduce an obstacle to international commerce and analysis as then, as such, some commerce is just not permissible and the whole idea of international specialization is defeated by production practices! But then, how do we know if well known food products, already sanctioned and of common use, protected by patents, trade secrets, industrial practices, are not actually the product of such technique? There is at least one such case covertly documented in a videogame, depicting a tragedy, others may be so common that we accept them without knowing it! Which makes me think of wines and cheese, for example, but ALSO of the **mad cows** disease, which may be induced by the same practice of cannibally but applied to an animal species... with deletereous effects for that species and ours. Groups opposing transgenics would do well to establish their assumptions and state whether they oppose advanced technology and the application of its possibilities per se (equivalent to luddism), which is a non rational, mobster activity born from fear and ignorance, or have knowledge and proof of empiric methods like the one discussed here that render those products AT LEAST suspicious or totally risky as unintended experimentation. Real, well theorized, laboratory based, experimentation and the commercialization of its results is totally desirable and unavoidable, but hidden experiments like culturing harvests on Human remains, no matter how well sustained are by traditional practices (like in traditional or alternative medicine), is unacceptable for modern minds. This includes also the use of pesticides, fertilizants, pollinization and even breeding performed without theoretical sound principles but justified by traditionalism, as we risk the danger of TOTALLY LOSING whole key species for Human consumption, which is even more fearful than the danger of losing a possibly bettered product which then would be impossible to produce or reproduce again because it is the result of a informal technique. Danilo J Bonsignore |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Using Daffodil remains as part of Organic matter | Gardening | |||
Cultures | Plant Biology | |||
Romneya coulteri - what remains after flower fades | Garden Photos | |||
hormone induction of root cultures | Plant Biology | |||
Poisoned Tree remains in compost heap? | United Kingdom |