LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old 11-07-2003, 12:20 PM
Archimedes Plutonium
Posts: n/a
Default differences between plant mitochondrial DNA and animal Plants the

Today I was wondering about whether a plant clone such as say aspen trees
or locust tree root cutting have the same mitochondrial DNA. That is, is a
plant clone identical to parent whereas in animals, any clone is say 60% or
identical to parent because the mitochrondrial DNA is not able to be
as exact duplicate.

And so, in my thoughts I realized I may have another Bifurcation of Physics
upon Biology. Another dualism in biology or inverse relationship. That only

plants of the plant kingdom can reproduce 100% copies whereas animals a
fraction due to nontransferrability of mitochondrial DNA.

If that is the case, then that would imply another inverse relationship in
that plants
have a high percentage of copy-ability whereas animals have a low
Perhaps this percentage numbers comes out to be an inverse relationship of
say plants 60% and animals 40% where some plant species is 98% and some
animal species 2%.

The Mitochrondia deals with motion and animals need motion which sets them
apart from plants and the plant kingdom.

Recently I was talking about the inverse relationship between calcium
of animals compared to carbon for plants (trunk or stem etc) And a poster
pointed out that most animals are insects and they have a carbon
My rejoinder to that is that the Linnaeus Classification needs revamping in
animals need be classified by "size". For it is well known in Quantum
Mechanics that we classify particles as to size and speed. Fastmoving and
small masses
to slow and large masses. Likewise the Animal kingdom needs revision where
the insects are Animal kingdom #1 and larger animals as Animal kingdom #2.

Now the question of Mitochrondial DNA may further impose lines in the
Linnaeus Classification sheme in that the larger the animal the less
of exact copy clone but as you get to the small animals such as insects and

smaller then the copy percentage rises.

More in the future,,, I hope... for this topic has been on my mind for
5 years now and the posts to the Internet evinces that.

For me, it is not a question of can or cannot Quantum Mechanics redo the
Linnaeus Classification scheme of life, not a question of can but a
of when physics will subsume biology in its broadest forms and trashcan the

Linnaeus system.

Archimedes Plutonium,
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Differences between 6-pod and 7-pod aero gardens Chuck Olson Lawns 1 14-07-2009 02:06 AM
Differences between Conservative and Liberals klunk Ponds 0 24-09-2007 11:52 AM
The Dr Hadwen Trust is the UK's leading medical research charity that funds and promotes exclusively non-animal research techniques to replace animal experiments Cerumen[_3_] United Kingdom 1 23-08-2007 05:57 PM
One Day International Conference on the Relationship between Animal Abuse and Human Violence pearl United Kingdom 5 19-08-2007 03:36 PM
Quantum Duality between Plant kingdom and Animal kingdom as macro duals Neil Horner Plant Science 1 13-07-2004 09:47 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2018
The comments are property of their posters.

About Us

"It's about Gardening"


Copyright © 2017