Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
size of evolutionary steps
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:32:48 +0000 (UTC), Stelios Zacharias
wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:21:38 +0000 (UTC), TomS wrote: From today's online "Science Daily" http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1113070616.htm "Research Sheds New Light On Process Of Evolution "For more than a century, scientists have concluded that a species evolves or adapts by going through an infinite number of small genetic changes over a long period of time. "However, a team of researchers, including a Michigan State University plant biologist, has provided some new evidence that an alternate theory is actually at work, one in which the process begins with several large mutations before settling down into a series of smaller ones. "The research is published in the Nov. 12 issue of the journal Nature." SNIP It's amazing what farfetched, factless, facetious theories these pseudos can come up with -- with so much time on their hands and to justify their existence (also, to pretend they're earning their near six-digit salaries). More pseudoscientific crap. Ed Conrad http://www.edconrad.com Man as Old as Coal |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
size of evolutionary steps
"Ed Conrad" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:32:48 +0000 (UTC), Stelios Zacharias wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:21:38 +0000 (UTC), TomS wrote: From today's online "Science Daily" http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1113070616.htm "Research Sheds New Light On Process Of Evolution "For more than a century, scientists have concluded that a species evolves or adapts by going through an infinite number of small genetic changes over a long period of time. "However, a team of researchers, including a Michigan State University plant biologist, has provided some new evidence that an alternate theory is actually at work, one in which the process begins with several large mutations before settling down into a series of smaller ones. "The research is published in the Nov. 12 issue of the journal Nature." SNIP It's amazing what farfetched, factless, facetious theories these pseudos can come up with -- with so much time on their hands and to justify their existence (also, to pretend they're earning their near six-digit salaries). More pseudoscientific crap. Indeed, it is interesting though to watch how time after time the misuse of the word 'evidence'. The 'scientific method' is simply a hoax, made up to fool the lesser bright ones among us. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
evolutionary purpose of husks on walnut | Plant Science | |||
EVOLUTIONARY CHAIN | Plant Science | |||
Reactor size VS Tank Size? | Freshwater Aquaria Plants | |||
Way Off Topic: Evolutionary substrate of aging | sci.agriculture | |||
Postdoc: Plant Evolutionary Genetics | Plant Biology |