Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old 07-08-2004, 08:21 PM
P van Rijckevorsel
 
Posts: n/a
Default sci.bio.botany is alive and well!

A quick look at Google shows that out of 16 sci.bio.* groups this NG is the
second most active group. Just discount cereoid's attempt to bore everybody
to death and this is a fine NG.
PvR

Let's rather discuss the desirability of including Celtis in the Cannabaceae






  #2   Report Post  
Old 07-08-2004, 09:09 PM
Cereus-validus
 
Posts: n/a
Default sci.bio.botany is alive and well!

Its alive!!! Its alive!!!

I see doctor Frankenstein has gotten around to bringing the Rinkytink
monster back to life.

Fire bad?

"P van Rijckevorsel" wrote in message
...
A quick look at Google shows that out of 16 sci.bio.* groups this NG is

the
second most active group. Just discount cereoid's attempt to bore

everybody
to death and this is a fine NG.
PvR

Let's rather discuss the desirability of including Celtis in the

Cannabaceae








  #3   Report Post  
Old 07-08-2004, 09:23 PM
P van Rijckevorsel
 
Posts: n/a
Default sci.bio.botany is alive and well!

QED

Cereus-validus schreef
Its alive!!! Its alive!!!


I see doctor Frankenstein has gotten around to bringing the Rinkytink

monster back to life.



  #4   Report Post  
Old 08-08-2004, 03:16 AM
Cereus-validus
 
Posts: n/a
Default sci.bio.botany is alive and well!

Your dim reply is once again proof of you deficient comprehension of English
vernacular!!!


"P van Rijckevorsel" wrote in message
...
QED

Cereus-validus schreef
Its alive!!! Its alive!!!


I see doctor Frankenstein has gotten around to bringing the Rinkytink

monster back to life.





  #5   Report Post  
Old 08-08-2004, 06:47 AM
Chuck
 
Posts: n/a
Default sci.bio.botany is alive and well!

My God you are such a bore and why don't you use your real name.

Chuck R.
"Cereus-validus" wrote in message
. ..
Your dim reply is once again proof of you deficient comprehension of

English
vernacular!!!


"P van Rijckevorsel" wrote in message
...
QED

Cereus-validus schreef
Its alive!!! Its alive!!!


I see doctor Frankenstein has gotten around to bringing the Rinkytink

monster back to life.









  #6   Report Post  
Old 08-08-2004, 08:41 AM
P van Rijckevorsel
 
Posts: n/a
Default sci.bio.botany is alive and well!

Cereus-validus schreef
Your dim reply is once again proof of you deficient comprehension of

English vernacular!!!

+ + +
As this is an international NG there is no place here for vernacular.
PvR

Did you really think all this time that these were just little voices in
your computer, a computer game without pictures? Ha! You must be very used
to talking to yourself.





  #7   Report Post  
Old 08-08-2004, 01:55 PM
Iris Cohen
 
Posts: n/a
Default Celtis & Cannabinaceae

Let's rather discuss the desirability of including Celtis in the
Cannabinaceae

You piqued my curiosity. This is what I found:
Family Latin Name:Celtidaceae + Cannabinaceae
Family Common Name:Hackberry Family
Order:Rosales
Order Type:Eudicots-rosids I
Defining Features:Wind pollinated. Fruits are adapted for dispersal by birds.
Defining Morphology:Floral Features: Flowers are usually unisexual (Plants are
monoecious). Flowers are very small and borne in an inflorescence of
determinate, axillary clusters, raceme-like or reduced to a solitary flower.
Ovaries are superior with apical placentation. Fruit and Seed Features:
Dicotyledon. Fruits are often drupe and have sweet flesh. Vegetative Features:
Habit as trees or shrubs or as a vigorous herb, either twining or erect, with
strong stem fibers. Leaves are alternate, simple, deciduous with oblique bases
or compound or palmately lobed and either alternate or opposite. Leaves margin
is serrate. Stipules are present.
Distribution:Temperate regions of N. Hemisphere and few species in the tropics.
Economic Use:As a source of timber, as cultivated garden ornamental, as the
source of hops used in brewing beer and as the source of marijuana, hashish and
hemp fiber. The family has a long history of association with humans, which has
resulted in many various cultiva
Number of Genera Globally:11
Genera Planted in Garden:Celtis, Humulus.
Number of Species Globally:180

The older authorities, including IPNI (IK) include Celtis in the Ulmaceae,
which belongs to the order Urticales. When did the above happen, & what is the
rationale?
Iris,
Central NY, Zone 5a, Sunset Zone 40
"If we see light at the end of the tunnel, It's the light of the oncoming
train."
Robert Lowell (1917-1977)
  #8   Report Post  
Old 08-08-2004, 03:02 PM
Cereus-validus
 
Posts: n/a
Default sci.bio.botany is alive and well!

That's right. Tell them what's up Chuck!!!

So exactly who is your god, Chuckie? Ignoramus?


"Chuck" wrote in message
ink.net...
My God you are such a bore and why don't you use your real name.

Chuck R.
"Cereus-validus" wrote in message
. ..
Your dim reply is once again proof of you deficient comprehension of

English
vernacular!!!


"P van Rijckevorsel" wrote in message
...
QED

Cereus-validus schreef
Its alive!!! Its alive!!!

I see doctor Frankenstein has gotten around to bringing the

Rinkytink
monster back to life.









  #9   Report Post  
Old 08-08-2004, 03:05 PM
Cereus-validus
 
Posts: n/a
Default sci.bio.botany is alive and well!

I bet you were really amazed when somebody finally explained that to you,
Rinkytink.

When was that? Just yesterday?

Now if only you could do something about those evil voices in your head.


"P van Rijckevorsel" wrote in message
...
Cereus-validus schreef
Your dim reply is once again proof of you deficient comprehension of

English vernacular!!!

+ + +
As this is an international NG there is no place here for vernacular.
PvR

Did you really think all this time that these were just little voices in
your computer, a computer game without pictures? Ha! You must be very used
to talking to yourself.



  #10   Report Post  
Old 08-08-2004, 05:13 PM
P van Rijckevorsel
 
Posts: n/a
Default Celtis & Cannabaceae

Let's rather discuss the desirability of including Celtis in the
Cannabaceae

Iris Cohen schreef
The older authorities, including IPNI (IK) include Celtis in the Ulmaceae,

which belongs to the order Urticales. When did the above happen, & what is
the rationale?

+ + +
There is a difference in IPNI between IK which uses the original name of the
family and Harvard which assigns it to a family of their own choosing.

Actually it did not happen, but it is one of those things which could happen
any moment, just like we lost Araliaceae, Flacourtiaceae and Epacridaceae,
etc. If it does happen it may not hold, like Araliaceae which popped back up
after having been deleted.

Still it feels pretty weird losing Celtis from Ulmaceae, and even weirder to
see it assigned to Cannabaceae.
PvR







  #11   Report Post  
Old 09-08-2004, 12:37 AM
Cereus-validus
 
Posts: n/a
Default sci.bio.botany is alive and well!

You are a royal mook, Rinkytink. No doubt about it.


"P van Rijckevorsel" wrote in message
...
Cereus-validus schreef
Now if only you could do something about those evil voices in your head.


+ + +
You did not need to tell us about the voices in your head. We already
suspected so but we were quite happy ignoring that. Now we will get Iris
explaining about the medication you should have been taking.
PvR






  #12   Report Post  
Old 09-08-2004, 01:59 AM
Iris Cohen
 
Posts: n/a
Default sci.bio.botany is alive and well!

Your dim reply is once again proof of you deficient comprehension of English
vernacular!!! BRBR

1. You would be more convincing if your own English were perfect.
2. How good is your comprehension of Dutch?
Iris,
Central NY, Zone 5a, Sunset Zone 40
"If we see light at the end of the tunnel, It's the light of the oncoming
train."
Robert Lowell (1917-1977)
  #13   Report Post  
Old 09-08-2004, 02:43 AM
Cereus-validus
 
Posts: n/a
Default sci.bio.botany is alive and well!

How this?

Pflerfen moin splergin grokoenkin wvngup, yah?

Word up, yo. Howz yer Amerikin conpehenshin, biatch?


"Iris Cohen" wrote in message
...
Your dim reply is once again proof of you deficient comprehension of

English
vernacular!!! BRBR

1. You would be more convincing if your own English were perfect.
2. How good is your comprehension of Dutch?
Iris,
Central NY, Zone 5a, Sunset Zone 40
"If we see light at the end of the tunnel, It's the light of the oncoming
train."
Robert Lowell (1917-1977)



  #14   Report Post  
Old 09-08-2004, 06:55 AM
Peter Jason
 
Posts: n/a
Default sci.bio.botany is alive and well!

Hey, Cerberus Canum, going back to our roots, are we?
chortl


"Cereus-validus" wrote in message
m...
How this?

Pflerfen moin splergin grokoenkin wvngup, yah?

Word up, yo. Howz yer Amerikin conpehenshin, biatch?


"Iris Cohen" wrote in message
...
Your dim reply is once again proof of you deficient comprehension of

English
vernacular!!! BRBR

1. You would be more convincing if your own English were perfect.
2. How good is your comprehension of Dutch?
Iris,
Central NY, Zone 5a, Sunset Zone 40
"If we see light at the end of the tunnel, It's the light of the

oncoming
train."
Robert Lowell (1917-1977)





  #15   Report Post  
Old 09-08-2004, 08:18 AM
Cereus-validus
 
Posts: n/a
Default sci.bio.botany is alive and well!

May Alex Haley bitch slap your mammy for boozing and smoking while you were
in the womb, Troll boy!!!


"Peter Jason" wrote in message
...
Hey, Cerberus Canum, going back to our roots, are we?
chortl


"Cereus-validus" wrote in message
m...
How this?

Pflerfen moin splergin grokoenkin wvngup, yah?

Word up, yo. Howz yer Amerikin conpehenshin, biatch?


"Iris Cohen" wrote in message
...
Your dim reply is once again proof of you deficient comprehension

of
English
vernacular!!! BRBR

1. You would be more convincing if your own English were perfect.
2. How good is your comprehension of Dutch?
Iris,
Central NY, Zone 5a, Sunset Zone 40
"If we see light at the end of the tunnel, It's the light of the

oncoming
train."
Robert Lowell (1917-1977)







Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
### Mini FAQ for sci.bio.botany # 012 ### P van Rijckevorsel Plant Science 0 15-01-2004 01:04 PM
### Mini FAQ for sci.bio.botany # 010 ### P van Rijckevorsel Plant Science 0 20-12-2003 07:10 PM
### Mini FAQ for sci.bio.botany # 005 ### P van Rijckevorsel Plant Science 0 14-10-2003 02:02 PM
### mini - FAQ for sci.bio.botany ( prototype ) ### P van Rijckevorsel Plant Science 0 06-08-2003 11:02 AM
FAQ in sci.bio.botany? MBKDAK Plant Science 5 06-07-2003 02:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017