Sean Houtman wrote in message news:1098587319.mRoAo2XDeJdzmpxj6i41vQ@teranews. ..
(ZZBunker) wrote in
om:

Sean Houtman wrote in message
news:1098501488.uZSIZNOh2QTOaxpX7HDxKA@teranews. ..
(ZZBunker) wrote in
om:


But, as fate would have it. Proteins are the most symmetrical
of all known molecules. Hemoglobin is one of few known
molecules that you can transfuse. An it's all because
all sugars, are in fact extracts of allergens. Not because
sugars are sweet.

It's not done with mirrors, it all done with
the universes most symmetric know objects:
logic tables, chairs, and, lasers.



Dude, don't you know that the protein folding project is much
less important to society on earth than SETI@home?

SETI@home is the most worthless science project
since science funded Carl Sagan to be a
chemo-theauphutic Ralph Nader wannabee MORON.

It is most overprced and stupid thing in
mathematics, since Bill Gates bought
the asccii symobol "@".

If you look in the right VV@R3Z sites, you can get SETI free! Then
you can hack it to point Aresibo at your house and fine there isn't
any intelligentce there!


It is more even idiotic that isiotic astronomer on Mars.
Since Mars is already ireserved for
Nuclear Weapons testing by the Chinese-Indian-Sri Lanka
druid astrologers for the Sing Sing Dynasty
of Feynmann-psycho-tart fame.


Oh, so you want to bring politics into this, huh? You,
you...Moderate!

No, I want to bring botantists into it. Since biologists
are already to have intelligence less than or
equal to both idiot astronomers and chemists.





Sean

Pigs do fly, Cereus. There're air freighted everywhere!
See what I mean?


"Cereus-validus." wrote in message
. com...
You need to know what the box really is before you can think outside it.
Otherwise, all you are saying is pointless nonsense of no value whatsoever
in the real world. You come across just as deranged and clueless as brain
damaged Archie. Sure he uses a lot of jargon but he really doesn't know
what
he is talking about.

What if Darwin got into the wayback machine and screwed Eve when Adam was
out looking for fig leaves? What if pigs could fly? So what?


"Peter Jason" wrote in message
...
I'ts called "thinking ouside of the box" Cereus Brutus. Can't you take
any
idea not in the text books?
'Ol Serious Invalidated becomes disphasic and disoriented when presented
with some new idea.
At least I don't smoke old cigarette butts.

"Cereus-validus." wrote in message
om...
Oh no, Peter has been smoking Archie's stash again.

When you're tripping, can you smell colors and see sounds? Just
curious,
would never do that nasty stuff myself.


"Peter Jason" wrote in message
...
I have a theory that birds are descended from insects, because:
1/ Insects knew how to fly already (being small, these creatures
could
take
advantage of the slightest breeze to become and remain airborne.)
2/ The avian lung is more like the insect's system, and remote from
those
of
dinosaurs/reptiles.
3/ Insects have wings already.
4/ Insects have been around longer.
5/ Insects have shorter generations allowing faster natural
selection.



"P van Rijckevorsel" wrote in message
...
Archimedes Plutonium schreef
So that is a nice compounding for animals. The compounding of
hair
into
that of multi-hair which ends up as becoming feathers.

*****
Right, birds and plants with compound leafs are birds of a feather
* * *

So then, since compounding is a ongoing phenomenon for both the
Plant
Kingdom as well as the Animal Kingdom that we must ask the
question
as
to what is the source of this tendency to compound within
biological
kingdoms.

*****
Energy efficiency
* * *

Darwin Evolution would spring in to say that the source for the
tendency
or proclivity to compound in Nature is due to the fact that DNA
is
itself a compound symmetry for it is not a single helix but a
double
helix.

*****
Darwin did not know about DNA and certainly had nothing to say
about
it
* * *

So life on Earth in a million years hence in the future, if it
survives
will have compounded in ways hardly imagineable to us today.

*****
Evolution moves slowly, but who knows how the influence of Man
wiil
work
out

Why don't you just go skipping off into the sunset hand in hand with Archie.
You know you want to do it.


"Peter Jason" wrote in message
...
Pigs do fly, Cereus. There're air freighted everywhere!
See what I mean?


"Cereus-validus." wrote in message
. com...
You need to know what the box really is before you can think outside it.
Otherwise, all you are saying is pointless nonsense of no value
whatsoever
in the real world. You come across just as deranged and clueless as
brain
damaged Archie. Sure he uses a lot of jargon but he really doesn't know
what
he is talking about.

What if Darwin got into the wayback machine and screwed Eve when Adam
was
out looking for fig leaves? What if pigs could fly? So what?


"Peter Jason" wrote in message
...
I'ts called "thinking ouside of the box" Cereus Brutus. Can't you
take
any
idea not in the text books?
'Ol Serious Invalidated becomes disphasic and disoriented when
presented
with some new idea.
At least I don't smoke old cigarette butts.

"Cereus-validus." wrote in message
om...
Oh no, Peter has been smoking Archie's stash again.

When you're tripping, can you smell colors and see sounds? Just
curious,
would never do that nasty stuff myself.


"Peter Jason" wrote in message
...
I have a theory that birds are descended from insects, because:
1/ Insects knew how to fly already (being small, these creatures
could
take
advantage of the slightest breeze to become and remain airborne.)
2/ The avian lung is more like the insect's system, and remote
from
those
of
dinosaurs/reptiles.
3/ Insects have wings already.
4/ Insects have been around longer.
5/ Insects have shorter generations allowing faster natural
selection.



"P van Rijckevorsel" wrote in message
...
Archimedes Plutonium schreef
So that is a nice compounding for animals. The compounding of
hair
into
that of multi-hair which ends up as becoming feathers.

*****
Right, birds and plants with compound leafs are birds of a
feather
* * *

So then, since compounding is a ongoing phenomenon for both
the
Plant
Kingdom as well as the Animal Kingdom that we must ask the
question
as
to what is the source of this tendency to compound within
biological
kingdoms.

*****
Energy efficiency
* * *

Darwin Evolution would spring in to say that the source for
the
tendency
or proclivity to compound in Nature is due to the fact that
DNA
is
itself a compound symmetry for it is not a single helix but a
double
helix.

*****
Darwin did not know about DNA and certainly had nothing to say
about
it
* * *

So life on Earth in a million years hence in the future, if it
survives
will have compounded in ways hardly imagineable to us today.

*****
Evolution moves slowly, but who knows how the influence of Man
wiil
work
out

Nah! You'd only get jealous and create a tawdry scene!



"Cereus-validus." wrote in message
. com...
Why don't you just go skipping off into the sunset hand in hand with
Archie.
You know you want to do it.


"Peter Jason" wrote in message
...
Pigs do fly, Cereus. There're air freighted everywhere!
See what I mean?


"Cereus-validus." wrote in message
. com...
You need to know what the box really is before you can think outside
it.
Otherwise, all you are saying is pointless nonsense of no value
whatsoever
in the real world. You come across just as deranged and clueless as
brain
damaged Archie. Sure he uses a lot of jargon but he really doesn't
know
what
he is talking about.

What if Darwin got into the wayback machine and screwed Eve when Adam
was
out looking for fig leaves? What if pigs could fly? So what?


"Peter Jason" wrote in message
...
I'ts called "thinking ouside of the box" Cereus Brutus. Can't you
take
any
idea not in the text books?
'Ol Serious Invalidated becomes disphasic and disoriented when
presented
with some new idea.
At least I don't smoke old cigarette butts.

"Cereus-validus." wrote in message
om...
Oh no, Peter has been smoking Archie's stash again.

When you're tripping, can you smell colors and see sounds? Just
curious,
would never do that nasty stuff myself.


"Peter Jason" wrote in message
...
I have a theory that birds are descended from insects, because:
1/ Insects knew how to fly already (being small, these creatures
could
take
advantage of the slightest breeze to become and remain
airborne.)
2/ The avian lung is more like the insect's system, and remote
from
those
of
dinosaurs/reptiles.
3/ Insects have wings already.
4/ Insects have been around longer.
5/ Insects have shorter generations allowing faster natural
selection.



"P van Rijckevorsel" wrote in message
...
Archimedes Plutonium schreef
So that is a nice compounding for animals. The compounding
of
hair
into
that of multi-hair which ends up as becoming feathers.

*****
Right, birds and plants with compound leafs are birds of a
feather
* * *

So then, since compounding is a ongoing phenomenon for both
the
Plant
Kingdom as well as the Animal Kingdom that we must ask the
question
as
to what is the source of this tendency to compound within
biological
kingdoms.

*****
Energy efficiency
* * *

Darwin Evolution would spring in to say that the source for
the
tendency
or proclivity to compound in Nature is due to the fact that
DNA
is
itself a compound symmetry for it is not a single helix but
a
double
helix.

*****
Darwin did not know about DNA and certainly had nothing to say
about
it
* * *

So life on Earth in a million years hence in the future, if
it
survives
will have compounded in ways hardly imagineable to us today.

*****
Evolution moves slowly, but who knows how the influence of Man
wiil
work
out

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 02:48:22 -0500 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(most snipped)


So in this light, can we say that sugars are the dual of proteins and
that plants consist on average 70% water, 20% cellulose and 10% other
whereas animals on average consist 70% water, 20% proteins and 10%
other.

Now this may get even more interesting, in that the relationship is not
only a dual complimentary relationship but that it is a *inverse
relationship*.

So let us say the average animal and average plant is the following
content:

Animal-- 70% water with 20% protein and 10% other

Plant-- 70% cellulose with 20% water and 10% other

The inverse is that plants inverse water for cellulose.

But I need some accurate numbers for the above is mostly my own guesswork.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies