Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD) rec.ponds.moderated-Follow-up
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:22:58 -0500, Vorian Atreides wrote:
[comments regarding creating a moderated] Vorian Atreides has not submitted an RFD to news.announce.groups, the only way to initiate an official RFD discussion. Such discussions take place in news.groups.proposals. This is not a real RFD, will not lead to creating a group, and is likely for the purpose of adding to your noise and cross-posts. -- Jayne |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD) rec.ponds.moderated-Follow-up
Jayne Kulikauskas wrote: On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:22:58 -0500, Vorian Atreides wrote: [comments regarding creating a moderated] Vorian Atreides has not submitted an RFD to news.announce.groups, the only way to initiate an official RFD discussion. Such discussions take place in news.groups.proposals. This is not a real RFD, will not lead to creating a group, and is likely for the purpose of adding to your noise and cross-posts. -- Jayne As I understand it it was sent at the same time it was sent to NGP last sunday. It was not posted Why? Let me guess, moderation. And thus the problem with a moderated group. Annoymous George has a contact in NG and has ask for them to wait for his RFD. So Vorian RFD is discarded. Anyone else wants a "moderated group? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD) rec.ponds.moderated-Follow-up
On 28 Nov 2006 07:35:53 -0800, Nekojin wrote:
Jayne Kulikauskas wrote: On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:22:58 -0500, Vorian Atreides wrote: [comments regarding creating a moderated] Vorian Atreides has not submitted an RFD to news.announce.groups, the only way to initiate an official RFD discussion. Such discussions take place in news.groups.proposals. This is not a real RFD, will not lead to creating a group, and is likely for the purpose of adding to your noise and cross-posts. -- Jayne As I understand it it was sent at the same time it was sent to NGP last sunday. It was not posted Why? I was not part of that decision, but anyone can read about the criteria for an RFD at: http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.p...icies:creation If Vorian Atreides submitted an RFD that was identical to the one that was posted, it failed to meet the stated criteria in many ways. For example, it did not include proposed moderators, gave incorrect information about the creation process and lacked a mandatory boilerplate. Let me guess, moderation. And thus the problem with a moderated group. Annoymous George has a contact in NG and has ask for them to wait for his RFD. So Vorian RFD is discarded. If Vorian submitted a correctly formatted RFD and established his identity as genuine, I expect that his RFD would be accepted. He has not done either of these things. -- Jayne |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2nd RFD: rec.ponds.moderated moderated | Ponds | |||
RFD: rec.ponds.moderated moderated (corrected) | Ponds | |||
REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD) rec.ponds.moderated | Ponds | |||
REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD) rec.ponds.moderated | Ponds |