Attn: all true rec.ponders -please post to news.groups.proposals -from ron
 

Hi everyone.

The RFD has now been published, and it appears in several
different newsgroups.

However, all _official_ discussion, pro and con, needs to take
place in news.groups.proposals. That is the only group officially
recognized by the B8 Management Board for discussions of new
newsgroup creation.

"That is the only place where it really counts."

Please take your thoughts, opinions, comments, etc. there if you
want them to be considered by the B8M Board.

Thank you.

Ron Schompert (formally known as "george")

Attn: all true rec.ponders -please post to news.groups.proposals -from ron
 

Phyllis and I did not realize my post had to go through the
moderators...so we posted it a second time...no result...then a third
time! Then we realized about the moderation. I (Jim) am afraid we
will look like spamers!

'Vorian', did you get a rejection or did it just not go up right away?

Jim


On Dec 14, 6:53 pm, Vorian_ Atreides wrote:
wrote:
Hi everyone.

The RFD has now been published, and it appears in several
different newsgroups.

However, all _official_ discussion, pro and con, needs to take
place in news.groups.proposals. That is the only group officially
recognized by the B8 Management Board for discussions of new
newsgroup creation.I've posted to the group and it was rejected. I am sorry Ron, But I will
be heard, where it really matters here on rec.ponds

My questions to the RFD were not unreasonable.
what are you afraid of?

And why did Tim cut and past your RFD before it was posted?

all true rec.ponders -please post to news.groups.proposals -from ron
 

wrote in message
...
Hi everyone.

The RFD has now been published, and it appears in several
different newsgroups.

However, all _official_ discussion, pro and con, needs to take
place in news.groups.proposals. That is the only group officially
recognized by the B8 Management Board for discussions of new
newsgroup creation.
===================
Please be aware that not all NSPs carry "news.groups.proposals." I had to
switch NSPs.
--
ZB....
Frugal ponding since 1995.
My Pond & Aquarium Pages:
http://tinyurl.com/9do58
~~~~ }((((* ~~~ }{{{{(ö ~~~~ }((((({*





--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

all true rec.ponders -please post to news.groups.proposals-from ron
 

Zëbulon wrote:

Please be aware that not all NSPs carry "news.groups.proposals." I had
to switch NSPs.

please be aware that google carries this group (my NSP doesn't but not
about to switch)....no issue subscribed within seconds....and I think
all of us can just about cope with reading the discussion via google
without switching NSPs on such an important discussion....

all true rec.ponders -please post to news.groups.proposals -from ron
 

google post are rejected.
only one person was able to respond twice in favor

why is that?

Gill Passman wrote:
Zëbulon wrote:

Please be aware that not all NSPs carry "news.groups.proposals." I had
to switch NSPs.

please be aware that google carries this group (my NSP doesn't but not
about to switch)....no issue subscribed within seconds....and I think
all of us can just about cope with reading the discussion via google
without switching NSPs on such an important discussion....

Sharing an address
 

I appreciate the care with which you looked at our post. Phyllis and I
share this address and many other things. She is nice to be married
to.

Jim

Gary L. Burnore wrote:
On 14 Dec 2006 17:08:36 -0800, "Jim and Phyllis"
wrote:


Phyllis and I did not realize my post had to go through the
moderators...so we posted it a second time...no result...then a third
time! Then we realized about the moderation. I (Jim) am afraid we
will look like spamers!

What you look like is a lamer who forces his wife to share an email
address.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
================================================== =========================

Sharing an address
 

Control is all thats on any of the proposed moderators minds.



On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:56:47 -0500, Gary L. Burnore
wrote:

On 14 Dec 2006 19:54:43 -0800, "Phyllis and Jim"
wrote:

I appreciate the care with which you looked at our post. Phyllis and I
share this address and many other things.

So you can control here. That's your call.



-------
I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know!

Controling by various means
 

You raise an interesting point about control.

Gregory Bateson noted that 'You cannot not communicate.' I have often
observed that there comes a point in many decisions where no decision
is in fact a decision. Faced with a decision, you cannot not decide.

I think the discussion of control by moderation and control by constant
conflictual or demeaning remarks falls into a similar category.

I wonder what it is about launching conflictual remarks that reaches so
deeply into some people? The anger reflected in some of the
conflictual posts seems to be anchored way down and to lash out with
much more energy that the triggering post demands. In some ways it
seems like the static electricity that we experience on wool rugs: it
builds up inside and then zaps whomever comes near when it has built
up.

Jim

Controling by various means
 

The persons personality is sufficient in most cases.!

On 15 Dec 2006 19:14:23 -0800, "Phyllis and Jim"
wrote:

You raise an interesting point about control.

Gregory Bateson noted that 'You cannot not communicate.' I have often
observed that there comes a point in many decisions where no decision
is in fact a decision. Faced with a decision, you cannot not decide.

I think the discussion of control by moderation and control by constant
conflictual or demeaning remarks falls into a similar category.

I wonder what it is about launching conflictual remarks that reaches so
deeply into some people? The anger reflected in some of the
conflictual posts seems to be anchored way down and to lash out with
much more energy that the triggering post demands. In some ways it
seems like the static electricity that we experience on wool rugs: it
builds up inside and then zaps whomever comes near when it has built
up.

Jim



-------
I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know!

Sharing an address
 

Some folks just have to be in charge no matter what.....its paralell
to Carol and her need to be center stage under the spotlight...yet
another example of what an attention whore is.


On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:56:47 -0500, Gary L. Burnore
wrote:

On 14 Dec 2006 19:54:43 -0800, "Phyllis and Jim"
wrote:

I appreciate the care with which you looked at our post. Phyllis and I
share this address and many other things.

So you can control here. That's your call.



-------
I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know!