Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old 16-03-2005, 12:53 AM
kathy
 
Posts: n/a
Default Algae control: first take one shark, basically OT

This is a fascinating article.

According to the Navy, algae and barnacles on hulls increase drag,

slowing ships and reducing fuel efficiency. Of the $550 million to $600
million the Navy spends annually on powering its ships and submarines,
at least $50 million stems directly from fouling-related increased
drag....
Sharks have placoid scales, which consist of a rectangular base
embedded in the skin with tiny spines or bristles that poke up from the
surface - the reason a shark's skin feels rough to the touch.
Brennan decided to try mimicking that surface with an artificial
coating to see if it would also have antifouling properties.

His first product: a combination plastic/rubber coating that a
microscope reveals is made of billions of tiny raised diamond-shaped
patterns. Each "sharklet" diamond measures 15 microns, or 15
thousandths of a millimeter, and contains seven raised ribs that at
close examination resemble different lengths of raised horizontal bars.
Laboratory tests show that the coating prevents a very common and
detrimental type of algae, called Ulva, from becoming established
because the algae's spores have great difficulty attaching to the
diamond-shaped configuration.

Entire article can be read he
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0310180225.htm

  #2   Report Post  
Old 16-03-2005, 03:56 PM
Hal
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 15 Mar 2005 16:53:11 -0800, "kathy" wrote:

Entire article can be read he
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0310180225.htm


Thanks,

Hal
  #3   Report Post  
Old 16-03-2005, 04:14 PM
Derek Broughton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

kathy wrote:

This is a fascinating article.

According to the Navy, algae and barnacles on hulls increase drag,

slowing ships and reducing fuel efficiency. Of the $550 million to $600
million the Navy spends annually on powering its ships and submarines,
at least $50 million stems directly from fouling-related increased
drag....


It is fascinating. That figure only looks at the immediate cost of fuel.
Then there's the cost of regular dry-docking for the addition of expensive
anti-fouling paints & the completely hidden costs to the environment of the
use of anti-fouling paints. Anybody involved with sea-going vessels has
been searching for this sort of solution.
--
derek
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Generic Shark Upright Widepath Vacuum Cleaner Bags, 10pk [email protected] Edible Gardening 0 22-05-2009 02:28 AM
Oxygen-poor sea may spark spate of shark bites SVTKate Ponds 6 09-08-2004 08:04 PM
"Shark" Algae Eater? stricks760 Ponds 2 02-02-2004 10:02 PM
Should I take the algae out of my pond Michael Shaffer Ponds 9 04-09-2003 06:32 PM
Algae Algae Algae -=Almazick=- Freshwater Aquaria Plants 16 23-08-2003 09:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017