LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old 26-04-2003, 12:30 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default [Fwd: Smoke n'mirrors department. U$ WTO challenge on GM crops]

or is the fun starting?

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Smoke n'mirrors department. U$ WTO challenge on GM crops
Date: 15 Jan 2003 07:05:23 -0600
From: MichaelP

http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentSe...=1042490755597

Financial Times (London) January 14 2003
By Edward Alden and Guy de Jonquieres

US LOOKS POISED TO TURN WORDS INTO ACTION ON GM CROPS

The US has talked for so long about a legal challenge to the European
Union's resistance to genetically modified crops that the threat has begun
to sound like a tape recording. Now Washington may be poised to put words
into action.

Last week, Robert Zoellick, the US trade representative, raised the stakes
by calling for the launch soon of a World Trade Organisation case against
the EU. Pascal Lamy, the EU trade commissioner, immediately promised a
vigorous defence.

If the US challenge goes ahead, it will be a huge gamble. It would be the
biggest and most highly charged in a long line of transatlantic trade
disputes that the WTO has been called on to adjudicate since the
mid-1990s.

Although a final ruling could take up to two years, litigation would
strain US-EU ties and imperil efforts to inject much-needed momentum into
the Doha trade round. Tensions could spill over into other areas of
transatlantic relations.

Furthermore, a US victory could prove pyrrhic. It would risk turning EU
opinion even more strongly against genetically modified organisms - and
the WTO - and kill off faltering European Commission attempts to restart
the approvals process.

The US might then seek WTO approval to retaliate against European exports.
That could further enrage the EU and lead it to activate $4bn (#2.49bn)
of sanctions against the US, authorised in a separate dispute over an
American corporate tax law.

Washington is keenly aware of the dangers. Indeed, the issue is so
sensitive that George W. Bush's cabinet may take the final decision,
probably later this month. However, Mr Zoellick's outspoken comments
suggest he is confident a WTO case will be launched.

Mr Zoellick has made clear that his patience snapped late last year, when
Zambia and Zimbabwe spurned offers of emergency US food aid that could
contain GM corn, saying that accepting it could jeopardise their
agricultural exports to the EU. He accused the EU of "immoral"
behaviour, claiming some member states had linked their aid to African
rejection of GM foods.

"The reason the logjam has finally broken is that this is no longer about
Europe but about Africa, India and the rest of the world," said a US
official.

US trade officials see parallels with their successful WTO challenge in
the 1990s to the EU's ban on hormone-treated beef. Although the ban has
not been lifted, they say the WTO ruling discouraged other countries from
imposing similar curbs.

A US challenge on GM products would pose an even bigger test than the
hormones case for the WTO's still sketchy jurisprudence on food safety.
It would target the EU's de facto moratorium on new GM crop approvals
imposed in 1998, and possibly a proposed directive requiring the
traceability and labelling of GM products put on sale. However, legal
experts are divided over the prospects for US success. The moratorium
could be difficult to attack, because it is semi-official and not based on
firm legislation, and the planned directive is not yet law.

"The US does not have a cast-iron case. It has a toehold case," says John
Jackson of Washington's Georgetown University, a leading authority on
world trade law. "I don't think current WTO rules can handle a case on GM
products. There has to be a negotiation."

Nonetheless, he and other lawyers believe that even if the WTO did not
uphold all its arguments, Washington might win enough to get the
moratorium condemned.

Some in Brussels also doubt whether a case would go their way. David
Byrne, the health and consumer protection commissioner, has acknowledged
the EU's defence would be based on "very narrow grounds".

The Commission still hopes it can fend off US threats by showing that the
EU is moving to open its market. Last month, in a symbolic gesture, it
used its powers under existing legislation to approve two oils derived
from GM cotton.

Brussels insists the best way to get the moratorium lifted is through
small steps, designed gradually to win over EU ministers and reassure
public opinion, environmentalists and other campaigners hostile to GM
foods.

However, the strategy will only work if EU governments co-operate. Even
optimists in Brussels are unsure that they will. "This is an area where
there are no guarantees," says one official. "Every prediction we have
made so far has been confounded."

======================

*** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. Feel free to distribute widely but PLEASE acknowledge the
original source. ***

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
U.S. attack on Mexican Beef and Rice Protection at WTO Torsten Brinch sci.agriculture 14 27-06-2003 02:20 AM
stop US pushing biotech/WTO on 180 nations in Sacramento Walter Epp sci.agriculture 9 22-06-2003 01:20 PM
[Fwd: Tests find traces of GM crops in US wheat supply] [email protected] sci.agriculture 0 05-06-2003 09:20 AM
[Fwd: GM Crops are Breeding with Plants in the Wild] [email protected] sci.agriculture 0 26-04-2003 12:28 PM
[Fwd: [Fwd: Science Reporters Don't Notice Conflicts of Interest]] [email protected]enet.net sci.agriculture 0 26-04-2003 12:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2021 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017