LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old 04-06-2003, 06:32 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default [Fwd: Tests find traces of GM crops in US wheat supply]



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Tests find traces of GM crops in US wheat supply
Date: 3 Jun 2003 08:23:19 -0500
From: "Mark Graffis"
Organization: ?

Tests find traces of GM crops in US wheat supply

USA: June 3, 2003

KANSAS CITY, Mo. - Tests have revealed that traces of genetically modified
grains are repeatedly creeping into U.S. wheat supplies, even as the debate
rages over whether the world's first biotech wheat variety should be
released in North America, grain industry sources said.

Biotech soybeans and corn, the two most widely grown genetically modified
crops in the world, are the common culprits. Traces of the GM crops have
been found not only in unmilled wheat but also in flour used to make bread
and other foods, sources said.
The findings come at a time when debate over biotech wheat is reaching a
near-fever pitch.

Critics fear that Monsanto Co.'s (MON.N) plans to release a genetically
modified spring wheat in the United States and Canada will cripple wheat
exports and add complications and costs for domestic players. The Canadian
Wheat Board, which controls that country's wheat exports, pleaded with
Monsanto this week to drop its bid for North American regulatory approval.

Many countries that buy grain from the United States refuse to purchase
bioengineered varieties, saying their consumers fear that the long-term
health and environmental impacts of the GM grains have not been established.

At Rank Hovis, the largest miller in the United Kingdom and an importer of
U.S. wheat, testing for biotech contamination has repeatedly found evidence
of genetically modified soybeans and corn particles mixed in with wheat
supplies, wheat director Peter Jones said.

"We routinely find beans and maize (in wheat) and we must accept that these
are genetically modified," said Jones.

U.S. industry sources are reluctant to discuss the matter openly because of
fears of scuttling U.S. wheat sales to countries wary of genetically
modified crops.

But they say the findings of biotech materials in nonbiotech wheat
illustrate the difficulties that lie ahead in trying to segregate wheat, the
most actively traded grain in the world.

"We've already got GM contamination in wheat in small levels from non-GM
sources," said one U.S. milling source. "If we can't keep the corn and
soybeans out of the wheat, how are we going to keep the GM wheat out of the
wheat?"

"The slightest little detection can complicate wheat shipments going out of
this country," said Steven Tanner, director of the U.S. Grain Inspection
Packers Stockyards Administration technical services division.

"The question comes down to what is reasonable. If you're going to say zero
tolerance you might as well stop world trade," Tanner said.

Millers said cleaning techniques remove most if not all traces of foreign
matter, though some small amounts are making it into flour.

In the United States, some major flour companies have started testing wheat
for customers who do business in other countries where no genetically
modified foods are allowed. Samples have turned up positive, causing
headaches and revisions to contracts, industry sources said.

The wheat most likely mixes with foreign materials as it moves through
storage and transportation systems that handle a variety of grains, experts
said.

The issue is not a new one. Four years ago, Thailand detected genetically
modified materials in a shipment of U.S. wheat and determined that GM corn
was to blame. The government then announced it would ban the import of all
GM seeds.

U.S. Wheat Associates said that it is not only U.S. wheat that often
contains small amounts of biotech grains.

In the European Union, which imports about 2 million tonnes of spring wheat
from the United States and Canada annually, many European grain companies
have developed tests to determine the presence of nonwheat biotech material
down to a level of 0.1 percent, according to U.S. Wheat Associates.

Wheat industry sources said most grain traders - both sellers and buyers -
would rather avoid testing wheat. They prefer to rely on the "letters of
assurance" that routinely accompany U.S. and Canadian wheat sales. The
letters certify there are "no transgenic wheat varieties for sale or in
commercial production."

But once regulatory approval is granted, even if Monsanto still has not
released its biotech wheat, those assurances could be lost.

"Europe has already been testing wheat," said U.S. Wheat Associates vice
president Nelson Denlinger. "When you get down to commercialization you're
going to have a major problem if people want non-GM wheat."

Story by Carey Gillam

REUTERS NEWS SERVICE

__________________________________________________ _______________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do you use hard or soft wheat for growing wheat grass for juice? James Edible Gardening 1 23-07-2006 05:56 PM
RR Wheat - but who wants it? (was GM German Wheat Trials...) Torsten Brinch sci.agriculture 78 10-07-2003 07:11 PM
[Fwd: Tests find traces of GM crops in US wheat supply] [email protected] sci.agriculture 0 05-06-2003 09:20 AM
[Fwd: Top UK miller to cut North America wheat if GM okayed] [email protected] sci.agriculture 0 05-06-2003 09:20 AM
[Fwd: [Fwd: Science Reporters Don't Notice Conflicts of Interest]] [email protected] sci.agriculture 0 26-04-2003 12:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017